29 October 2015

Desperate UN ramps up the Global Warming fearmongering

A few days ago, the UN told the world that bacon and deli meats cause cancer. Or, as I like to call it, Sharia law by stealth.

So, let's follow the UN's logic regarding the link between bacon and global warming: animals cause global warming due to their flatulence, so what better way to stop you getting cancer and saving the planet at the same time, then by you switching to a plant-based diet and not relying on farming for animal products! 

A twofer. Are you feeling good about life or what?

Well, the global warming nutjobs decided to go one scare further today, with Harvard University releasing a new study that shows that higher concentrations of carbon dioxide will not only heat the planet until it explodes, but it will also make people dumber. These findings, of course, are not true if you look at other earlier studies showing higher concentrations of CO2 had ZERO impact on human cognitive behaviour. 

Maybe the 'scientists' should leave their bubble more often - all that gas and hot air would make anyone dumber.

Let me just pause here for a minute and remind readers that carbon dioxide makes up 0,04% of the atmospheric gasses. It's a trace gas with magical and mystical powers. 

Who knew?

Al Gorelioni quickly jumped on Twitter to tweet his outrage over the powers of the magical gas:



Now, reverse-midas-touch Gore should rather just shut up, seeing as most of his predictions about Earth's destruction have proven to be just hot air. For example, he predicted that the arctic would be ice-free by 2014. That was last year and we're still waiting. While we wait, there has been record levels of sea-ice at both poles..... 

Then he also predicted that polar bears would be drowning left, right and centre, because there would be no ice for them to live on. Instead, bear numbers have increased and there is, shock and horror!, more ice than ever before. I'm betting the bears are wishing there was less ice and more global warming so they can find food easier....

Going on that track record, maybe Gore insisting global warming is real is actually causing the planet to cool. 

Mother Nature does have a wicked sense of humour. 







South Africa: Tax the rich to pay for free education

It must be nice living on Planet Cuckoo-land. That's the planet where Communists, Progressives, Social-Justice-Warriors, Marxists and Lefty-loons live.

On Planet Cuckoo-land, you can dream any dream you wish, and then get others to pay for it. The collective 'others'. That would be you and me, the hard-working, responsible tax payers.

No individual thinkers are allowed on Planet Cuckoo. No sirree Bob. Just group-think agitators and ideologues. After all, what's better than a collective group of Commie brains thinking?

That's why the ideology of Planet Cuckoo-land appeals to the lowest achievers in society. If you can't achieve on your own, let others achieve for you and pay towards supporting your life. Why bother to strive to better yourself if you're not forced to take responsibility? All you have to do these days is squeal, and bingo, that welfare check is in the mail, faster than you can smoke a joint.

Free is the way to go these days. Never mind who ends up paying - because nothing in life is ever free. Even freedom has a price.

In South Africa, there have been university protests across the country - all to do with rising university fees - #feesmustfall. On average, fees were set to rise by 11.5%, but after the wave of protests, the ANC government stepped in and declared that there would be no rise in fees. 

Has that placated the mostly Black protesters? Of course not. Their protests then morphed into wanting education for free, and then it morphed into anti-White hatred. These Black protesters are now calling for the "decolonisation" and "transformation" of higher education institutions. 

In other words, Whites must go and Blacks must replace them. In the classrooms, as lecturers, as cleaners, as students. Whites be gone!

Of course there were some dumb-as-rocks White kids protesting with the Black 'students'. Yay, like, it's a cool revolution and everything, and like, we're in it cause social-justice or something.

In fact, the dumb White girls were standing in the front of the protesters to shield their Black brothers from the po-lees. Today those same Black brothers want these stupid White girls and boys out of the universities, as the Whites are colonisers and are stopping Blacks from achieving greatness.

The Black protesters are also not happy with the ANC, who promised them the moon and stars and plenty of free-stuff back in 1994. There was going to be free everything for the poor, mistreated Blacks. Free housing, free education, free health. That was when the ANC hierarchy were still living on Planet Cuckoo-land - where promises are made and no one has to deliver. But, once they were in power, the reality set in. 

Just who was going to pay for all those free promises?

Well, the answer was supposed to be the Whites, but then the Dead Terrorist Mandela brought in Affirmative Action and Black Economic Empowerment laws and pretty soon Whites started fleeing the country. The ANC also empowered the criminals, and pretty soon the biggest crime wave on the African continent was underway. From a country of law and order, chaos,murder and rape became king. 

The ANC also started looting the tax coffers to the tune of R35 billion a year - or R700 billion over the past 20 years. At the same time, the ANC encouraged Black women to have more and more babies out of wed-lock, bribed with child-grant money and free health carrots, and the already poor Black population experienced a baby-boom the country could ill afford. Now they cry about all the poverty.....

Something had to give.

Now the Black masses are sick of living in poverty under their precious ANC, with none of the free stuff they were promised by them in 1994. Utopia never arrived.

Their first instinct, naturally, is to blame the White "colonisers".  Of course. Hasn't this always been Africa's way? If you can't do, blame others - preferably Whites.

I have yet to read one article about the student protests that puts the blame squarely on the ANC's shoulders. It is their policies which has led to job-losses, a stagnant economy, a crime-infested country, with corruption the new sport. And a White population in continual flight out the country.

Instead, Apartheid is blamed. That dead, buried and cremated horse of 21 years ago. Yup, they're still flogging it back to life.

Back on Planet Reality, the remaining working White population of South Africa are still paying the bulk of the taxes. There are less than 5 million Whites left in SA compared to the 40 million Blacks - and they are STILL carrying the Black dead-weight.

Shame on you, IQ67!

It's not the White's fault that, despite the ANC's racist anti-White policies, they're still able to overcome these obstacles and out-think, out-smart, and out-do their Black brethren. It's not the White's fault that they tend to have smaller, stronger families with a Mother and Father to guide them and look after them and care for them. It's not their fault that they regard education as the ticket to future success. It's not their fault that they have an abundance of intelligence, intellect and vision. 

That is the truth of it all - as unpalatable as it is for Black South Africa. Despite the small size of the population, the Whites are still at the forefront of South Africa's success. Instead of having an eternal pity-party, the Whites have put their nose to the grindstone and gotten on with their lives. And instead of the Blacks learning from White success, they instead covet what others have earned and blame the very people who is keeping South Africa going, for the lack of their own success.

Well dear IQ67's, go drink some cement and harden the F-up. When you are next out protesting, maybe go look for your backbone. The White population doesn't owe you one frigging thing. But, YOU owe them plenty. YOU owe them everything. You should be kissing their toes in gratitude for all they've done for you over the centuries. 

But no. History has been so distorted and South Africa will never heal.

And then here comes the ex-General Secretary of the South African Communist Party and current South African Minister of Higher Education and Training (cough-BS-cough) Blade Nzimande. And what does this wonder have to say about the student protests?

Well firstly, he thinks that the student protests are a result of the success of the ANC's higher education programme. 

Yeah, no.

He also thinks that the only way to make education fair in SA is to tax the rich to pay for the free education the ANC promised back in 1994. Like I said, Planet Cuckoo-land is a great place for underachievers.

Yeah, that'll will work out great. Let's tax the 'rich' to pay for the free education you promised - for people who shouldn't even be at university in the first place. Let's kill off the productive and discourage them from doing well to pay for dumb-and-dumber, who create zero jobs and who leave university barely employable.

And let's rather not look at stopping ANC corruption and using the stolen R35 billion per year on the "free" education they keep promising.

Nah, that would be too easy an option. No, the answer is to tax the rich, until there is no more rich, no more job creators, and everyone is equally poor and miserable. 

That is the tiny mind-set of the Communists, Progressives, Social-Justice-Warriors, Marxists and Lefty-loons on Planet Cuckoo-land. 

Below are a few photos of the protests. Just look at the stupid White students, aiding and abetting those who hate them. They are protesting for their own demise. 

Sometimes,  if you're that dumb, the only answer is to feel the consequences.




























26 October 2015

Wallabies vs All Blacks in RWC final

Firstly, apologies for being so quiet on the blog - I've had to deal with a number of unexpected crisis at work with one of my projects, which has aged me 100 years. It's not completely out of the woods yet, but things have settled down to a point were I can blog a few times a week. Apologies to all those who have sent me hat tips via email - I literally have had zero time to read them.

Secondly, Wallabies, you bloody beauty!! Against all odds, we have managed to make the final of the Rugby World Cup. 

On our way to the final we have beaten: Wales, England, Scotland, Argentina - to name but a few. We have been pummeled, had a lucky escape against Scotland, but we still made it to the final.

I've always maintained that whichever team won Pool A - aka the pool of death - would make the final. Unfortunately, I didn't think further to add that, whichever team won Pool A, would not only make the final, but win the tournament.

Hopefully I haven't jinxed my Wallabies and we give the All Blacks a big surprise on the week-end. We are the only team to beat them this year, so it's not impossible. And wouldn't we like to wipe the cocky grins from the faces of the All Blacks? You bet. The All Blacks have hardly had to wash their togs the entire cup, what with the easy path they've had to the final (apart from against SA, which the Boks should have won).

So, good luck to the Wallabies this week-end. Make us prouder than we already are, boys. 







Lebanon - how the West is following the same pattern

In case you haven't worked it out yet, the West is under onslaught.

Under Islamic onslaught.

For centuries, Muslims have been held in check, confined to their own sandpit regions, to live and kill each other as is their want.

However, that all changed a few decades ago, hastened on by (predominantly) America's meddling in the region, usually by deposing the (necessary) brutal strongmen that Islam requires to keep the cult's blood-hungry followers at bay. 

Saddam is but one example. Ghadaffi another. Mubarak a third. 

Assad would be the fourth - however, Assad has Russia in his corner, fighting and helping to keep him in power, against America's wishes.

Why America feels the need to dictate who runs the region is anyone's guess, but it usually boils down to money, greed and global power.  There are usually plans to follow - blueprints made decades earlier - in a game of Chess we know nothing about. We can only speculate.

And, as we have seen time and time again, removing the necessary strongman usually leads to  very bad consequences. In the case of Iraq, the consequence is ISIS. In the case of Libya, the consequence has been a tribal war with different Islamic factions all fighting for control. 

And today you have Libya being used as a launching pad to invade Europe. Just as Ghadaffi warned. This invasion is better known as Hijrah.
Hijrah: A word for immigration jihad, where Muslims overwhelm a country and assert supremacy by sheer numbers.  
Muslims have quickly worked out that the gullible, naive and infantile Liberal is his best way to conquer the West. Islamists are particularly adept at slowly undermining Judeo-Christian values and using the Liberal values of tolerance, multiculturalism, and free speech to take over democratic societies.

At this point, let's swing to Lebanon, where, a scant 75 years ago, Beirut was known as the "Paris of the Orient" and Lebanon the "Switzerland of the East". Lebanon was once a pro-Western hub of economic prosperity. Tourism, agriculture, democracy, and education flourished in the 1960's under then president, Charles Helou.

Due to this prosperity, democratic Lebanon welcomed Muslim immigrants and allowed foreign students to study at its universities, and work in the country. 

The downside to all this tolerance and welcoming by the Christian government, was that soon the heavy Muslim immigration and high Muslim birthrates changed the population balance between the Maronite Christians and Sunni and Shia Muslims, and began to shift in the favor of the Muslims - with the Muslims becoming the new majority. 

This situation worsened in the 1970's when "Palestinian refugees" fled Jordan and ran to Lebanon during Black September. Black September was the Jordanian civil war from 1970-1971, between the PLO (led by Yasser Arafat) and the Jordanian armed forces, led by King Hussein. The war ended with the expulsion of the PLO and it's fighters to Lebanon. From there, the PLO led raids and attacks on Israel. 

Jihad was declared, marking the beginning of the Lebanese Civil War, and countless atrocities against the Christians and Jews ensued. Lebanon today is a basket case. Gone is the economic prosperity, the vibrancy, the pro-Western democracy, replaced by a Muslim-hellhole. 

Segue to Britain today, where the steady stream of Muslims into the country is starting to change the face of England. In 2001, the Muslim population was 1.6 million. In 2011, it had increased to just under 3 million. Muslims now make up nearly 5% of the population, with the name Mohammed the most popular in the cities, and 10% of children under 5 years old being Muslim.

This trend of Islamification of the West is being seen in Canada, France, Sweden and now Germany, as well as other countries - including Australia one day.

Note that Muslims will not flee run to another Muslim-run country, but rather to the "Christian" West, where the tolerant Liberals are found in their droves. Saudi Arabia, as well as the other rich Gulf states, refuse to take any of the "refugees" from Syria and other Islamic countries. That alone should tell you all you need to know.

And in the West, anyone raising their concerns, or speaking out about the invasion, is quickly dubbed a "racist" or an "Islamaphobe" by the Left-run media as well as the other farkwit goons on social media.  Never underestimate the stupidity of a Liberal Lefty. 

At the end of the day, Lebanon was the canary in the coal mine for the West regarding the Islamic invasion blueprint. Just as South Africa was the canary in the coal mine on what happens to a White-run fully functioning country when you appease the non-White elements.

Did we listen to South Africa's lesson?? No.

Did we listen to Lebanon's lesson? Not yet. 

Are we as a race just like a bunch of frogs in slowly heating water? Abso-bloody-lutely.

What can we do about this, when our own governments are the traitors from within, seeing as they're mostly gullible, hand-wringing, navel-gazers, who border on the infantile with their embracing of the multi-cultural train-wreck?

If someone knows the answer, let me know. Until then, my plan is to one day move to a remote Aussie coastal town, full of bogan Australians, because they are the only ones who can save our country. 

Just like the soccer-thugs will save England.






12 October 2015

Well said Prof. Ryszard Legutko

Prof. Ryszard Legutko from Poland gave it to Merkel and Hollande a few days ago in the European Parliament regarding the immigration problem they created. He pointed out that the European Union is made up of 28 members and not just Germany and France. 

His best line was regarding communism and a saying from the bad old days: Communism is a system which courageously solves the problems itself created. This can also be said about the Euro system. We created the system and since day 1 we have been wrestling with the problems it's generated.......

I must say, Merkel looked distinctly uncomfortable - but I'm guessing this will be water off a ducks back. Merkel is powerful within the EU and she basically tells the EU what to do. What does she care about the opinions of the other member states?






08 October 2015

Australia: Left vs Right

Some context. Liberals in Australia are considered conservative (seeing as liberal and libertarian are the same thing). In America the Left hijacked the term - as they always do - to hide their true ideology, which is everything not libertarian....







Russia launches cruise missiles into Syria

After 5 days of pounding Obama's "moderate" Syrian rebels, ISIS and the other rag-head murderers in Syria, with over 100 airstrikes , Russia has now launched a volley of complex cruise missile strikes against the filthy rag-heads - from 4 ships nearly 1,000 miles away, in the Caspian Sea:








The above picture doesn't indicate the exact path of the missiles, but just shows you the distance the missiles have traveled into Syria. The missiles 'engaged all the assigned targets successfully and with high accuracy' according to Russian Defence Minister Sergei Shoigu.

Syrian ground troops are now moving in under the cover of Putin's airstrikes.

There are also reports that the Russian special forces Spetsnaz units are preparing ground assaults to 'wipe out' rebels fighting the Syrian President. By 'wipe out', let's hope they mean totally annihilate and destroy them. Spetsnaz are highly trained and extremely aggressive. You don't mess with them. 

I'm sorry to say it, but this has been an awesome display from Russia so far. Their military might has been building up over the years, led by Putin, and while Russia was strengthening their military, Obama was dismantling the US military just as quickly, replacing all the competent generals with his fabulous social justice warriors.




Russia has been planning this exercise for months. They have been completing military drills, together with China, in preparation for this onslaught. This wasn't an overnight decision with no preparation. They would have known exactly which targets to hit, and where Obama's proxy army was hiding. 

First you pound their hideouts from the air, then you bomb their strongholds in the cities they have captured, then you move in on the ground - and you show no mercy. Then you watch as the cockroaches scurry away, then you step on them with a huge boot.  The Jihadi's wouldn't know what hit them. Already 450 have surrendered. Let's hope they are shown the same mercy they showed the Yazidi's women and girls, which would be none.

In last Friday’s press conference, Obama said that Putin was acting “not out of strength but out of weakness".

If this is what Russia's weakness looks like, then bring it on.

In contrast, when Obama acts out of weakness, he's merely playing to his strength.

Just about the entire world is behind Putin on this one - except the NATO gang. And it's about time. Russia is proving the old adage - don't talk, do.

Those who can't do, talk. Hi Obama.

And of course, the Lefty media keep reporting about all the civilian deaths at the hands of the Russians. Yeah, I don't give a rat's behind. There has been thousands of civilians deaths in Syria and Iraq since the Arab Spring and the ISIS invasion  (never mind the Iraq war), and very rarely were the media too concerned. Now all of a sudden, since Putin decided to clean up this mess, now they're concerned at the deaths? 

Maybe they should read the comments under their 'oh look how evil Putin is' articles. I have yet to see ONE comment not supporting his actions. You, dear media, are on the wrong side of history. Piss off.

And go cry me a river. 






Germany: We will manage - Merkel


Repeating the mantra “Wir schaffen das,” (“We will manage,”) German Chancellor Angela Merkel is defending her strategy on handling the refugee crisis against growing criticism.

What is her thinking, you ask? Well, her thinking is as follows:

“Let’s just assume we all would declare that we will not manage it — then what?” she asked host Anne Will in a prime-time, adding: “Those people who are helping are an example for the many people willing to manage this situation together with me.”

If brains were dynamite, Merkel wouldn't blow her ears off.  

So, her plan is to will it all to be okay with positive thinking in response to letting 1.5 million Muslim and African 'refugees' into Germany this year?? That's like jumping out of a plane with feathers attached and willing yourself to fly. Does that work, Merkel? Hint: no. The odds would be against you.

Asked what she will do, now that she is losing the support of her political allies?

“I have a plan,” she said 

So, Frau Merkel, what is that plan?

"The first thing I need to achieve is that Europe lives up to its responsibility, and not just four countries".

So, there you have it, she is passing the monkey she alone bought, and placing it on the backs of all the other countries who didn't have a say in buying the monkey.

Genius!

And just to cement her reputation as the most idiotic current European leader, in a party meeting yesterday, Merkel was especially tough on European countries that have portrayed the acceptance of refugees as a threat to religion. “When someone says: ‘This is not my Europe, I won’t accept Muslims….’ Then I have to say, this is not negotiable.”

This woman is not only a danger to Germany, she is a danger to the Western world.

Germany, under this lunatic, is once again going to destroy Europe.

No wonder the polls have shown her support drop from 60 to 47.

Still too high if you ask me. A few more weeks and she'll be in the negative.






06 October 2015

Meanwhile in Holland.....

Check out these grateful 'refugees' who are on their knees kissing Dutch soil in gratitude.

Only kidding. 

No, complaints from these ungrateful invaders range from the rooms at the shelter being too small with no privacy, there are no heaters or fridges in their rooms, it's smelly, it's too cold.....

Many are threatening to leave, and the officials have said cheers, see ya later.

I must say, for 'refugees' they sure look pretty healthy. The main female speaker has blue hair and bright pink nails which look very well manicured. Yeah, she sure looks like she fled for her life.





The English language









Germany expects 1.5 million asylum seekers this year, report says

So, about those 800,000 economic migrants from Africa and the Middle East set to invade Germany this year.... yeah, scrap that. The number is now 1.5 million.

That's according to a confidential document containing estimates that are far higher than the officially released figures.

Gee, you would think the German government were covering up something unsavory.....

Germany is expecting 7,000-10,000 immigrants PER DAY until the end of the year. Who knows what happens next year. 

But, the good news doesn't stop there. No sirree Otto. Each asylum-seeker who successfully obtains refugee status can bring on average "four to eight" family members to Germany:
On the basis of the preliminary forecast of 920,000 migrants, some "7.36 million people" could therefore have the right to move to Germany due to family ties. 
Imagine that. Another 8 million Muslims/Africans added to your population overnight. Then watch as they start breeding like rabbits in the next few years. That 8 million will double no problem. Especially seeing as Germoney pays for people to have children. Then pays you not to work. Paradise!

According to the article below, "Chancellor Angela Merkel has been lauded worldwide for her decision to open Germany's doors to refugees fleeing war and misery." Haha. Yeah, sure they are lauding her. Or maybe they're laughing so hard at her stupidity and what's she's doing to a future Germany. 

Back in Germany, Merkel's popularity is on the slippery slide downwards. It appears reality is starting to bite those who were in the pro 'refugee' camp. Yes, those idiots begged, please invade our country, change it from Christian to Muslim, bring in your conflicts, your liars, your rapers, your misogynists, your low-intelligent-low-skilled unwanted masses, bring in your breeding cows, and come make Germany better! 

Said no one ever, apart from the dumb self-hating Lefties.




BERLIN: Germany could receive up to 1.5 million asylum-seekers this year, according to the newspaper Bild, quoting a confidential document containing estimates that are far higher than publicly released official figures. 

Authorities have so far predicted that Europe's top economy would record between 800,000 and one million new arrivals in 2015. 

But Bild quoted the document saying that the authorities were now expecting to receive 920,000 new arrivals in the coming three months alone, bringing the total number of asylum-seekers this year to 1.5 million. 

"The migratory pressure will increase. For the fourth quarter, we expect between 7,000 and 10,000 illegal entries a day," according to extracts of the document, although Bild did not specify its source. 

"The significant number of asylum-seekers risks becoming an extreme burden for the regions and communes," added the document. 

The newspaper also quoted the document estimating that each asylum-seeker who successfully obtained refugee status could bring on average "four to eight" family members to Germany. 

On the basis of the preliminary forecast of 920,000 migrants, some "7.36 million people" could therefore have the right to move to Germany due to family ties. 

Interior ministry spokesman Harald Neymanns would not confirm the figures, noting however that the onset of winter could slow the surge in arrivals - as shown in previous years. 

"We are still expecting the migration pressure to drop in the winter months," he said. 

Government spokesman Georg Streiter said he was not aware of the document's existence. 

Chancellor Angela Merkel has been lauded worldwide for her decision to open Germany's doors to refugees fleeing war and misery. 

But within Germany, her popularity is starting to wane as local authorities struggle to cope with the massive task of hosting the record surge in refugees. 


Sweden: Lesbian "Bishop" wants to remove church cross for Islam

This post is just to show you how farked up Sweden is becoming under the Progressive filth running the country. Actually, apply that to any country Progressives occupy. They are mentally ill.

A  Church of Sweden lesbian Bishop, Eva Brunne, is proposing removing all signs of the cross from a church in her diocese, and rather marking the direction of Mecca for the benefit of any Muslim worshipers who may happen to stumble onto the church. 

Because, one wouldn't want to offend Muslims or stop them from visiting a church, because, god forbid, there are Christian symbols in a Christian church....

I wonder if lesbian Bishop Brunne is aware of what Muslims do to homosexuals?

That's what's wrong with the world. A lesbian - made a Bishop of a Christian church. A woman who can't preach about the traditional family, espouse the values, and/or promote true Christianity. Bishop Eva was the first token first openly lesbian priest to be made a Bishop of the Church of Sweden and is 'married' to a fellow lesbian priest Gunilla Linden and the happy wives are raising a young son. There is so much wrong with this entire scenario - where does one even begin?

God help the child, is all I know.

Actually, I'm pretty surprised Sweden has any churches or Christians left. I guess this woman is an example of what the new social justice "Christian" churches, springing up all around the world, promotes. Anything that was once shunned is now considered 'normal' and is to be embraced, encouraged and defended at the expense of the traditional family and Christian values. Just imagine sitting through one of her sermons. You'd leave feeling dirty.

These days the church is no longer a meeting place of worship, but rather a political platform used by the Left to brainwash people and make them feel guilty, because they're not tolerant enough, or not doing enough to help their fellow 3rd world'ers. Go to 'church' and get preached to on how you need to accept non-Christian values, sacrifice your society to be inclusive and diverse, and give your hard-earned money to others who are too lazy to help themselves. 

After all, the West was built into a success by diverse people sitting around all day moaning about what they don't have and envying and coveting what others have achieved.

In the past, missionaries used to go out into the world to preach about goodness, and try and better the lives of the non-believers. Most were murdered, so that had to stop. Nowadays, church leaders would rather just bash their followers over the head in church. It's much easier than actually doing, and makes them feel good at the same time.

In this case, the church targeted by this lesbian woman is the Seamen’s mission church in Stockholm’s eastern dockyards. The church is visited by travelling seamen. 

What is her reasoning behind removing the cross, you ask? From her blog:
"It is important that there are places for praying sisters and brothers and we show hospitality and tolerance, regardless of faith."
I'm going out on a limb here, but I'm pretty sure no mosque would remove traces of Islam for the odd Christian who happened to go inside? Just a wild guess. 

What's next? Muslim prayer-rooms and Buddhist altars in consecrated Christian churches? Err.... yes, most definitely. It's only a matter of time. The West is being Progressed down the toilet after all.

Then she keeps going:
"Priests are called to proclaim Christ. We do that every day and in every meeting with people. But that does not mean that we are stingy toward people of other faiths."
This is what 'tolerance' brings the world. A messed up society trying to please everyone, so as not to offend anyone, or be regarded as stingy. Being all things to everyone never works out very well for the appeaser. 

Sometimes, dear lesbian Bishop, you have to draw a line in the sand and stick up for your principles and protect the heritage you were fortunate enough to inherit from previous generations. But when you don't have principles, then this is the end result. Appeasement.

Her final words of wisdom:
Remember to entertain strangers, for it has happened that those who have done it have had angels without knowing it.  (Hebrews 13: 2)
Thanks, but I would prefer not to entertain strangers. Same as I would prefer not to pick up hitch-hikers. It often doesn't end well.

But, seeing as the good Bishop is big on quoting the Bible, maybe she needs to read this passage:
Exodus 23:24 Thou shalt not bow down to their gods, nor serve them, nor do after their works: but thou shalt utterly overthrow them, and quite break down their images.
Maybe the Bible was translated incorrectly into Swedish? That would sure explain a lot of what's gone wrong with Sweden.

Once you start trashing church traditions, pretty soon you have to make it up as you go along, until suddenly there’s nothing left of what you inherited or stood for. 

Next thing Bishop Lesbian Brunne knows is that there's a mosque where once a Church of Sweden stood. That should make her real happy.


The appeaser Bishop Eva Brunne

The Bishop of Stockholm has proposed a church in her diocese remove all signs of the cross and put down markings showing the direction to Mecca for the benefit of Muslim worshippers.

Eva Brunne, who was made the world’s first openly lesbian bishop by the church of Sweden in 2009, and has a young son with her wife and fellow lesbian priest Gunilla Linden, made the suggestion to make those of other faiths more welcome.

The church targeted is the Seamen’s mission church in Stockholm’s eastern dockyards. The Bishop held a meeting there this year and challenged the priest to explain what he’d do if a ship’s crew came into port who weren’t Christian but wanted to pray.

Calling Muslim guests to the church “angels“, the Bishop later took to her official blog to explain that removing Christian symbols from the church and preparing the building for Muslim prayer doesn’t make a priest any less a defender of the faith. Rather, to do any less would make one “stingy towards people of other faiths”.

The bishop insisted this wasn’t an issue, after all airports and hospitals already had multi-faith prayer rooms, and converting the dockyard church would only bring it up to speed. Regardless, the announcement has aroused protest.

Father Patrik Pettersson, one of the priests in her diocese and active in the same parish as the Seaman’s mission church has hit back in a blog of his own, complaining there is no way you could equate a consecrated church with a prayer room, remarking “I should have thought a bishop would be able to tell the difference”.

02 October 2015

This is my understanding of the Syrian situation


This is my assessment of the Syrian situation:


Obama's administration and the neo-cons in Congress want President Bashar al-Assad of Syria gone. Dead or alive, he needs to go. The exact reason is unknown, but what is known is that Saudi Arabia and Qatar - both allies of the USA - are enemies of Assad. 

Assad is a Shia Muslim, the Saudi's and Qataris are Sunni Muslim. This is the reason for the centuries-old conflict in the region, and importing this conflict into our Western countries via Muslim "refugees" will not end well for us.

The Saudi's go one step further in that the Sunni's are Salafi and/or Wahhabi Sunni's - ultra conservative orthodox Muslims, who tend to interpret the Koran extremely literally. Hence why people have their heads chopped off in the street if you insult Mo. This is also the reason they use their oil money to litter the world with Wahhabi mosques and Islamic-only schools, i.e. madrasa, in Western countries - to force Islam onto kaffir non-believers. It's why Saudi Arabia very generously offered to build one new mosque in Germany for every 100 Muslims Germany takes in as 'refugees', without offering to take in any refugees themselves. Just like all the other rich gulf states, Qatar included, who have also not offered to take in any Muslim "refugees". 

The stupid West gets that honour. Nothing like enriching a country with imported tribal conflicts. Hi Germany!

Apart from the obvious tribal conflicts between the different Islamic sects in the Middle East, there are also underlying geo-political power-plays driving the conflict in the region. 

Syria stands in the way of any direct gas/oil pipeline into Europe, which Qatar wants to build. If they have their proxy ISIS running Syria, problem solved.

So, on the one side you have the Shia-run countries (supported by Russia):
  • Syria
  • Iran
  • Lebanon (Hezbollah)
  • Iraq
On the other you have the Sunni-run countries (supported by the USA/Britain):
  • Saudi Arabia
  • Qatar
  • Turkey
Iraq is a mix of the two sects, but Shia is the slight majority (~ 51% Shia and ~42% Sunni). The government is mainly Shia. Hence why Iran is their current buddy.

So, back to Syria. 

The USA, for unknown reasons, decided to stick its nose in the region shortly after Barry from Honolulu was elected POTUS. This was all done by encouraging the Arab Spring. This off the back of Barry removing US troops from Iraq without leaving a presence behind to maintain the fragile and hard-won peace. 

How many (White) American troops died fighting that war, all for it to mean nothing in the end??? Same with Afghanistan.

The Arab Spring was no 'spontaneous grass-roots movement' as certain people and the media would have you believe. It was a carefully orchestrated attack on certain strategic Islamic regimes in the ME. 

As part of the Arab Spring, America threw their former friendly-dictators under the bus, one by one. Out with the old, in with the new.

The catalyst for the Arab Spring was in Tunisia, where a man set himself alight to protest the poor economic state in the country. That was the spark used to justify the Arab Spring spreading to other countries.

First Mubarak was thrown under the bus and Egypt fell to the Muslim Brotherhood; however, order was quickly restored - luckily - with the military taking over and ousting the MB. The Brotherhood - backed by Obama - is Sunni. Obama's half-brother is a member of the Muslim Brotherhood...

Libya was then targeted and Ghadaffi removed with the blessing of Hilary Clinton. Just under a year later, US Ambassador Stevens was murdered in Benghazi along with 3 other Americans. Reason for his murder is unknown, but it is widely believed it was because America was funneling Ghadaffi's stockpile of weapons to the Syrian 'rebels' via Libya - overseen by Stevens, and planned by Hilary/Bill Clinton and the Obama administration. Bill Clinton is in bed with the Qataris through his "foundation". He has received millions in donations from them and used his wife to further Qatar's agenda. I would guess it's why Madam Clinton used a private email account while Secretary of State.

Today Libya burns with tribal wars and ISIS infiltrating. The country now acts as the gateway for Africans and other economic migrants to climb on board boats headed for gullible Europe. Ghadaffi warned this exact thing would happen should he be removed. 

In the meantime, the Arab Spring was 'spontaneously' moving from one ME country to another. It spluttered in Yemen, but gained traction in Syria. Syria was the ultimate prize of course. 

The US military armed and trained "good rebels" in Syria to depose Assad. And just as the world was looking incredulously at America for wanting to start another ME conflict, the US government miraculously found evidence that Assad had used chemical weapons against his own people - thereby justifying them bombing Syria. Barry had just by pure accident a few weeks earlier, drawn a red-line outlining at what point he'd bomb Syria to help the rebels and save Syria, and that red-line was if Assad used chemicals weapons. 

And bingo, don't you just know it - Assad was found to have done just that by Obama's 'rebels'. Gee, what are the chances, right? And there are still idiots in the world who think Assad wasn't set up. 

Luckily Russia stepped in before America started bombing and defused the situation by convincing Assad to hand over any chemical weapons he may have. That was a pretty genius move by Russia, as it nullified the US from using that paltry excuse to bomb Syria down the line; and, it made the world see that Assad was willing to do the right thing.

Russia started looking like a world-leader (hence why they had to attack Putin via Ukraine and sanctions).

Back in Iraq, the ousted army generals and soldiers who served under Suddam Hussein, had united to form ISIS in east Syria, on the border with Iraq. Once America removed the troops from Iraq, that was the signal for ISIS to move into Iraq and start their campaign of creating the Islamic caliphate via their war of terror and death. That was the excuse given, but the real reason was to depose the Shia government in Baghdad and return government to the Sunni's. Saudi Arabia and Qatar would be happy again.


Most of the Syrian "rebels" who had been armed and trained by the US to depose Assad, joined ISIS instead, eagerly handing over their band-new American-gifted weapons and other supplies to ISIS, and the rest is pretty much history.

In Syria today you have the US-backed 'rebel' fighters fighting side-by-side with ISIS to get rid of Assad. They are practically one and the same thing.

And that is the reason Russia bombed the hell out of the 'rebels' 2 days ago when they launched their air offensive in Syria. 

Both the rebels and ISIS are enemies of Assad. Assad is Russia's ally.

I find it pretty funny how the American analysts now attack Russia for targeting the US-backed 'rebel' fighters. HELLO! Earth to reality.

Saudi Arabia was also quick to condemn the Russian bombings. Apparently innocent women and children were killed. This all said with a straight face. First, dear Saudi Arabia, you execute women and children in your country every year - usually on the flimsiest excuse - without batting an eyelid. Secondly, have you forgotten that Saudi Arabia has been bombing Yemen for months now, killing thousands of innocent women and children in the process???

The hypocrisy is astounding.

Russia has stepped in because they have 2 military bases in Syria to support their Black Sea naval fleet - plus, Assad is their ally. Unlike America, Russia is loyal to their allies. Having Assad in control of Syria also secures them against Qatar threatening their gas lines into Europe.

Iran needs Assad to remain where he is, otherwise Hezbollah in Lebanon will be cut off from Iran and Turkey will have more clout in the region. Iran also needs to secure Iraq against Saudi Arabia getting their grubby paws on the country via ISIS.

The only issue I don't quite understand in this entire drama, is why America, under John Kerry, decided to work with Iran regarding the nuclear issue. That part is still a bit hazy to me.The only reason would be to threaten Israel via Iran - but then why go to the trouble of destabilising Syria and Iraq to return them to Sunni control if you then work with Iran and strengthen a Shia nation? Maybe one of my readers can help me out with that one.

And there you have my brief analysis. Let me know if you disagree.