30 September 2015

Guess where in the world.....

Let's play a game of 'guess where in the world'.

Was this video shot in:
  • Africa
  • The Middle East
  • Austria/Hungary


The Invasion of Europe - Pat Condell

Pat Condell has released his latest video titled "The invasion of Europe".

Condell is an Irish/English writer, comedian and YouTube personality.

In the video below he laments how the EU can't be trusted with the security of Europe due to the Muslim invasion. 

Condell is a militant aetheist, and as with all aetheists, he has done his part in trashing the Judeo-Christian heritage of the West. For decades he has lambasted Christianity constantly. I'm guessing Condell is Gay from the way he speaks so no guesses as to why he's an aetheist.

But, now Pat moans about the Islamic invasion.

Pat, dear, there are consequences to actions. Maybe think about that next time.

What I find ironic is that these aetheists sit in nice safe countries, created based on Judeo-Christian principles, then turn around and trash what that heritage has brought them - stable, enlightened, safe and civilised societies (tolerant of homosexuals). Our laws and social norms, after all, have been shaped by the 10 Commandments found in the Bible. 

Well Pat and all you other militant aetheists, you have helped pave the way for the Muslim invasion to happen, when you helped bring down Christianity. Once Christian principles were weakened and removed, it led to the erosion of civil society. The fabric of core beliefs that once held everyone together has slowly been torn apart.

And all you good Progressives clambered for multi-culturalism - now you've got it in spades - so you should be out celebrating what you helped create and not making videos moaning.

So, you ask, just how can I blame aetheists for the destruction of the West? 

Well, what belief system do Progressive aetheists ascribe to?? The answer: Any trendy new shiny thing that comes along that takes their fancy. Their new cause suddenly becomes acceptable and is pushed on everyone else. And they keep going. There's a constant new want or need they have to satisfy. And everyday they move further and further away from common decency, respect, civility and Christian principles, towards debauchery, disrespect and loutish behaviour.

Because when you have no higher power to answer to, you become your own god and conscience. In the world of the aetheist there is no sin, because there is no higher being judging you. Whatever you feel like doing, just do it. 

Sex, drugs and rock-n-roll, baby!

As the saying goes: He who stands for nothing, falls for anything (and everything). 

As Christianity has fallen, so has Progressivism risen, and with it the dark world of what Progressives stand for. The world has flipped upside down under the Progressives. And not for the better.

With atheism has come moral relativity which has paved the way for such frauds as multi-culturalism, because, well, all cultures are really equal and who are we to tell people they can’t kill their wives and mutilate their daughters? After all, we have no belief system at all or we all have different ones so what the heck, everything goes. Right?

We no longer have a shared conscientiousness of what it means to be a Western society. There is no consistent set of values anymore that will allow people to fight back against an enemy. Who is the enemy anyway?? These days we are not allowed to know, or think thoughts - because putting labels on people you neither trust or like is showing you to be a racist bigot xenophobe.

The other laughable argument from aetheists against religion is that they don't go around slaughtering each other over "an imaginary friend in the sky". 

Yeah, except that authoritarian regimes such as the Marxists, Communists, Nazis and your garden variety fascists (including the Islamic cult), all of which are the natural enemy of God, dispatched more people off this mortal coil last century than anything else - combined. They didn’t do so over arguments about flying spaghetti monsters, but this didn’t stop the wholesale brutality and murder of hundreds of millions of people.

It's easy to kill when you don't have to answer to God.

So, chin up old boy. No more sad-sack videos about how you hate Islam. Embrace your new fascists in England. You helped build this - so own it. Proudly.

And I'm guessing that right about now, Pat is thinking Christianity isn't so bad after all.......


A debate was held on 17 SEP 2015 between Danish and Swedish politicians,  media and commentators about refugees in their countries.

I was quite proud of myself - I managed to listen to the entire thing without putting my fist through the computer.

The level of stupidity from EVERY Swedish participant (apart from the last lady Paula Bieler from the Swedish Democrats) amazed me. Now you can see why Sweden is a lost cause. The level of brainwashing and politically-correct group-think from the Swedish Left is pretty scary. And they speak with such conviction. 

How does that saying go? The most dangerous liars are those who think they are telling the truth. 

The female Mayor of Sodertalje in Sweden, Boel Godner was a classic fascist. She couldn't admit on TV that her municipality couldn't take anymore 'refugees'. She has previously said they are not coping with the numbers, but in this debate she outright refused to even entertain the idea. Then she went on to attack Ms Bieler, saying that just because the anti-immigration party, the Swedish Democrats, had nearly 30% support in Sweden, didn't mean they should be heard. She likened them to a party of Nazi's. 

I guess the tolerant Left is only tolerant when you agree with their views. Otherwise, you need to shut up, keep your views to yourself - or better, don't think them - and you are regarded as the unseen, unheard great unwashed. Thank goodness for the morally superior Ms Godner. She must think she's god, or something.

But, the real piece of work was Swedish 'journalist' Henrick Arnstad. See if you can count the number of times he used the words: racist, Nazi, or referred to the second world war. You'll give up after the first few minutes. No matter the point made, he kept going back to racism and WWII. My IQ fell listening to him.

If this is the level of public officials, then kiss Sweden goodbye. 

There is some hope for Denmark, though. A slight glimmer. At least in Denmark you may openly state your views, which is not allowed in Sweden.

29 September 2015


The Gauteng education MEC Panyaza Lesufi is fresh out of ideas.

That's what he gets paid lots of money for - to be out of ideas.

Which ideas is he out of? Well, he's given up on how to stop the high levels of teenage pregnancy in schools in his province. That would be Black teenage girls.

Here is verbatim what he had to say about what he thinks the reason is for the problem:
“It’s a process. You drink alcohol, your knees get weak, then you need ‘tjovitjo’ (sex) and that leads to pregnancy.”
No Mr Lesufi. The reason girls are getting pregnant is because monkeys like you are running government departments, when all you are good enough to do is to smash big rocks into little rocks and keep repeating the process until you are one day no more.

Seriously. How can these imbeciles be running anything? Drink alcohol. Knees get weak. Have sex and then pregnant? He sounds like he's been having some good dreams. I wonder how many babies he's fathered with school girls?

How about doing something about the first point. How about discouraging teenagers from drinking? You think??

How about getting their parents involved? How about bringing in some tough laws, such as if you get pregnant, you have to leave school and you don't qualify for any baby grants - your family has to support you and the baby forever? That would be a start. Maybe it would force parents to care where their daughters are and what they're getting up to.

Then how about charging whoever is having sex with the underage girls - usually grown men? The fathers need to pay for the upkeep of their babies, and if they're at school, they should also be forced to leave together with their baby-mamma.

If there is no consequence, there is no reason to stop unacceptable behaviour.

Those are just a few random ideas, Mr Lesufi. And I don't even get paid your big fat salary.

And how about bringing discipline back into schools? Back in the bad days of Apartheid, you hardly had any girls getting pregnant at school. Know why? Because it was seen as a HUGE embarrassment to the family. The girls had to leave school and were not welcomed back. They just left in the middle of the night. Back then, school girls getting pregnant were regarded as sluts. There was also no abortion available, so you and your family had to live with the consequence for the rest of your lives. The embarrassment, the scandal, the gossip, the shunning - that was enough to make girls think twice.

But not today. No, the old days were just too strict. Maybe - but then which attitude is better? A strict no tolerance approach, or the modern 'anything goes' attitude of today?

Well, one policy produced hardly any teenage pregnancies. The other has left the department of education out of ideas.

The new South Africa normal

PRETORIA - Gauteng education MEC Panyaza Lesufi says his department has run out of ideas of how to stop the high levels of teenage pregnancy in schools across the province.

The MEC has called on those attending the Gauteng Education Summit this weekend to help him address the problem.

Drugs and alcohol abuse in schools are also at the top of the agenda of the summit and Lesufi has called on the Gauteng Department of Social Development for its assistance.

Lesufi says the out of control levels of teenage pregnancy in schools are the result of a value chain: alcohol, drugs, and unprotected sex.

“It’s a process. You drink alcohol, your knees get weak, then you need ‘tjovitjo’ (sex) and that leads to pregnancy.”

He says that means HIV and Aids are entering the schooling space and his department is at a loss of how to deal with it.

But the MEC made it clear that sex education is needed.

“Before you give them condoms, educate them first, and then distribute condoms later.”

Lesufi has also called on the provincial government to shut down taverns selling alcohol and drugs to underage girls.

Germany introduces Apartheid

Yes, you read correctly. Apartheid goes to Germany.

Apartheid basically means separateness. Germany is now separating the Christian and Muslim migrants, hence Apartheid:
In the German state of Thuringia, Prime Minister Bodo Ramelow, one of the multiculturalists driving and celebrating the migrant crisis, has been forced to initiate a policy of separating and segregating different cultures as soon as they arrive in Europe.
So there you have it. A liberal state PM, who is a multi-culturalism worshiper and an avid migrant celebrant, is being forced to implement Apartheid to keep the different cultures and religions apart. 

To keep the Muslims from attacking the Christians.

I bet some of you are thinking that calling that Apartheid is a far reach. Yeah, maybe, but I'm just doing what the Liberal media did for years to South Africa: over-exaggerating. For years White South Africans were the pariah of the world for wanting to live separate from the violent Black tribes. So, why should other countries be treated differently when they impose similar policies?

Apartheid it is then.

And it keeps getting better. Sixty people were hurt when a mass riot broke out over food at a tented refugee camp in Calden near Kassel, Germany. Police used tear gas to break up brawling between ~400 refugees:
The riot at Calden near Kassel came on the the same day Germany's biggest police union called for a new 'apartheid' system to be enforced in refugee homes – the separation of people according to religion – after a number of flare ups in recent weeks.
See, even the German police call it Apartheid. 
Conservative politicians back the calls for separated refugee centres, claiming Christians in the homes are being harassed and persecuted by hardline Muslims. 
How mad must you be to willingly import these barbarians into your country? It's not as if the German government wouldn't have been aware of what the most likely outcome would be when you bring in 800 000+ mainly young male Muslims in a year. Hint: Just look at what their home countries look like.

You can read about the riot HERE. You will note from the article that anyone who is against the migrant invasion and dares to protest is labeled as a far-right extremist...... how utterly predicable and misleading from the media. Sigh.

As expected, Angela Merkel's popularity is on the decline, as Germans wake up from their 'initial elation' of welcoming the economic migrants:
Officials are working to “ward off panic” regarding the 1 million migrants expected to enter the country this year, as the realities of the crisis begin to set in on German residents.
“There have … been signs that the initial elation is fading,” reported German weekly Der Spiegel in a lead article this week, according to NBC News. “Germany is struggling to maintain its composure and to ward off panic.”
Yes Germany, now is the right time to panic.

And, initial elation?? Anyone suffering from elation should be given a few 'refugees' to look after, at their own cost. That would soon cure them of elation or a sense of welcome.

A conservative estimate is that an additional 800 000 migrants this year will cost Germany about 10 billion euros. Germany also plans to set aside 5 billion euros  in windfall income this year to help cover the cost of looking after asylum seekers in 2016. 

Are they kidding? It cost Australia $10 billion to process and support 50,000 illegal boat arrivals under Labor, so please go pull the other leg if they think it's only going to cost 10 billion euros for 800 000 of the buggers. You can easily times that 10 by 8 and you start getting a rough idea of the true cost of Merkels compassion.

That doesn't factor in the additional costs when the 800 000 start bringing in their extended families, or the crime cost to the country....... Germany will soon overtake Sweden as the rape capital of Europe.

Imagine bringing in nearly 1 million low-intelligent, low-skilled people in a year and trying to sort them out with jobs, housing, education and medical care? How many jobs has Germany got ready for these migrants?? People who can't understand the language, or the culture, or have the skills to work as anything more than a labourer? 

Who the heck is paying for all this compassion? The German citizens.  I'm not sure if Merkel asked her citizens if they were happy for her to spend nearly 100 bn euros of their taxes to support 1 million invaders. 

As a result of this compassion, some Germans are getting kicked out of their rental properties as landlords get paid more to take in refugees. Pensioners are still waiting on a pension raise, but oops, there's no more money as migrants now come first ahead of German citizens, who have paid taxes their entire lives.

This is what redistribution of wealth and national suicide looks like. 

Yup, makes perfect sense. If you're a commie liberal progressive narcissist.

New German citizens


While Obama fawns over Pope, Russia and China arrive in Syria

Last Friday the Chinese aircraft carrier Liaoning-CV-16 docked at the Syrian port of Tartus, accompanied by a guided missile cruiser:
...... sources find evidence that the Chinese forces are digging in for a prolonged stay in Syria. The carrier put into Tartus minus its aircraft contingent. The warplanes and helicopters should be in place on its decks by mid-November - flying in directly from China via Iran or transported by giant Russian transports from China through Iranian and Iraqi airspace.
The USA now looks pretty foolish, seeing as both Russia and China are now in Syria, there to support and protect their ally Assad. They are also working with Iran. A move the USA didn't seem to see coming, or chose to ignore until too late.

Once the Chinese aircraft carrier arrived, leading-from-behind John Kerry quickly tried to engage Iran to bypass the Russia/Chinese initiative, but alas, poor Ketchup Kerry was too late, as Iran has been moving forward fast to augment its military presence in the war-torn country, buttressed by the ground, air and sea support of two world powers, Russia and China.

I guess Kerry thought he had built up street-cred with Iran, seeing as he'd bowed down to Iran only a month earlier and opened up the possibility of them acquiring nuclear weapons. Thanks John!

Just a tip dear Mr Kerry - when you operate from a position of weakness, then your enemies are laughing at you and not waiting on you with bated breath.  You are now regarded as a gullible fool in Iran, you twit. 

If you snooze you lose, and it looks like the US government and Obama was more interested in fawning over the Marxist Pope and worrying about 'global warming' than keeping their eyes on Syria, China, Russia and Iran. 

Russia has two bases in Syria - the logistics base in Tartus and the military airfield in Latakia. They are now constructing a military base in Latakia, which is roughly 5km away from the Bassel al Assad airport that also serves as a military airfield.

So, why are Russia and China so interested in defeating ISIS? Apart from ISIS threatening Assad, they also have personal interest in some of the ISIS fighters:
DEBKAfile’s counterterrorism sources point out that just as Russian marines will be instructed to single out rebel militias with recruits from Chechnya and the Caucasus, the Chinese marines will seek out and destroy Uighur fighters from the northern predominantly Muslim Chinese province of Xinjiang.
In the same way that Putin has no wish to see the Chechen fighters back in Russia, so too Chinese President Xi wants to prevent the Uighurs from returning home from the Syrian battlefields.
So, there you have it. Some leaders with testosterone and national interest at heart.

The US military under Obama has been decimated of its top leaders, and has instead morphed into a social experiment, where Christianity is discouraged, feminism is encouraged, and social justice and inclusivity of every sexual deviant is celebrated. 

This is the natural psyche of the Progressive pacifist, which explains Obama. 

Obama also doesn't have the heart to destroy what he lovingly helped create - ISIS. He has limply gone through the motion of bombing them on the odd occasion, with hardly any impact made over the last few years. His military response against ISIS mirrors his effeminate character - he is an empty suit on an empty chair - and so is his bombing campaign in Iraq and Syria.

Let's see how Russia, China and Iran go against ISIS. We can only hope that they manage to wipe the scum off the world map. 

And Obama should be worried, because defeating ISIS would not only be a coup for this new tri-military partnership, but it will also show Obama up for the do-nothing, incompetent, floozy of a community organiser that he is. 

What is very clear now, is that Assad will remain in Syria. Russia, Iran and China have spoken and the USA has no choice but to listen - unless they want to start World War 3.

28 September 2015


Zimbabwe: Villagers skip meals to save scant food

Apparently "drought" has decimated maize crops again this year in Zimbabwe. That's the quaint euphemism Mugarbage uses when he can't admit it's his racist land reform polices starving his own people:
Mugabe says the low yields are due to erratic rains caused by climate change, along with a lack of fertilizer, seed and farming equipment for the beneficiaries of his land reforms, most of whom lacked the means to run farms.
Yeah, just blame everything, even the climate, for your failings. Notice that his land reform policies are never to blame - according to him. Never even mentioned.

As a result, his people are skipping meals to save what little food they have stored.

I'm pretty sure that if you asked Zimbabweans what they would prefer - food in their belly or land to 'farm' - they would take food any day of the year. These days they can only dream of food, with the kids having to scratch in the dirt for food in between the 2 meals they get a day. 

It's not exactly a positive to have land if you don't know what to do with it.....

Ah...... land reform, all under the guise of 'redressing imbalances' and giving Zimbabweans land. Only Black Zimbabweans by the way. Others need not apply.

This, dear Liberals, is called consequences to actions. The consequence is millions of starving people, and the action was to take farms away from one racial group to give to another incompetent racial group - and then for you to ignore it. If ex-Prime Minister Ian Smith had acted in this way, every bleeding heart Liberal would have been out protesting all around the world, calling for his racist head. 

But, seeing as it's Mugarbage, there is absolutely, positively nothing to see or say here.

The article does eventually give a hint as to the cause of this sad state of affairs:
Once a major producer of corn, Zimbabwe has become a perennial importer of food following a slump in agricultural production blamed on President Robert Mugabe's land reforms, which saw the seizure of land from white commercial farmers for redistribution to landless blacks.
All we need is for the world to stop aiding Zimbabwe. No food, no water, no money. Seal the borders and force the Zimbabweans to deal with Mugarbage once and for all. Do they want to starve for the rest of their lives? Would they prefer the farms back in the hands of the White farmers? Do they want to have economic rejuvenation? Do they want to prosper, even if that means the Whites run the country again?

If any of those questions were answered yes, then you need to get rid of the cancer that is Mugarbage. 

And that applies equally to South Africa.

However, we all know that the African is very scared of the White man, so it will never happen. No, the suffering Blacks would rather run to Europe than have a White man run their own countries.

The irony.

Bindura - Villagers in Zimbabwe are skipping meals and foraging for wild fruit as food stocks run out after a poor harvest blamed on drought and controversial land reforms.

"Even if the children complain of hunger there is nothing we can do about it," says Rabian Chidamba, 40, a mother of four who lives in Musana district northwest of the capital Harare.

She has cut the family's meals to two a day as she ekes out her small stock of the staple food, corn.

Breakfast is tea with home-baked cornmeal bread, while supper is cornmeal and fried kale, occasionally supplemented with a small portion of meat.

"When the children get hungry between meals they go and look for wild fruit," Chidamba says.

She still has some corn in her makeshift granary, unlike many of her compatriots in other districts whose food stores are empty, but the next harvest is not due until April or May next year.

"Our harvest came to 10 bags of maize instead of the 30 bags we usually get," she said.

Chidamba usually sells surplus corn to raise money for her children's school fees and other necessities, but this year's harvest is not enough even to feed her own family.

At least 1.5 million Zimbabweans are in need of food aid, according to the United Nations World Food Programme and other aid agencies.

Once a major producer of corn, Zimbabwe has become a perennial importer of food following a slump in agricultural production blamed on President Robert Mugabe's land reforms, which saw the seizure of land from white commercial farmers for redistribution to landless blacks.

Germany: Women, children raped in migrant camps

Oh dear. The poor Liberals don't know which way to turn. How do they explain the rape of women and children in migrant camps by their new Islamic heroes? 

Or as I like to call it - Islamic cultural enrichment:
Rape and child abuse 'are rife in German refugee camps': Unsegregated conditions blamed as women are 'seen as fair game' in overcrowded migrant centres
Well, Liberals don't explain. No, they much prefer to treat this issue as they do most of their juvenile issues - by ignoring reality. Sweeping it under the PC carpet. And what better way to ignore the issue than to keep insisting that we must do more to save the millions of other Muslims living in poverty or in war zones. 

And by doing more, they mean bringing these Muslims into our countries so that we can look after them and magically transform them into civilised people.

Yes, that is the answer. Not forcing them to fix the problem at source, but to rather import those problems into our own countries to fix.

Except fixing doesn't happen. It hasn't happened. And it won't happen. But, who cares, right? As long as we are SEEN to be doing something, anything, then all the consequences don't really matter. Who cares that our women and children will be raped, as has happened all over the world where these Muslims settle? Take as an example  Rotherham in England, where over 1400 White children were raped by Pakistani males:
At least 1,400 children were subjected to appalling sexual exploitation in Rotherham between 1997 and 2013, a report has found.
Children as young as 11 were raped by multiple perpetrators, abducted, trafficked to other cities in England, beaten and intimidated, it said.
I have never seen such a scandalous episode as this mass rape of underage White children by Muslim men, receiving the barest minimum of airtime or media attention in my lifetime. The media preferred to gloss over this uncomfortable scandal, because if they didn't report it then it really wasn't such a big deal, right? 

Apparently the media these days is under the impression that if they report crimes committed by Muslims, it is tantamount to being Islamophobic.

Such is the sick world we live in.

Now, if 1400 underage Muslim children had been raped by White males then this would have been a different story with a different outcome with a different reporting cycle. That is the truth of the matter. That is the media we have to live with today. They are mostly of the Left and they are there to protect the Left's views, not to report uncomfortable truths.

The truth to the media is like sunlight to vampires.

As a result, most uninformed and disinterested people are blissfully unaware of what Muslims bring to their world. They would be the same uninformed people who would be at the front of the 'we welcome refugees' rallies, or holding candle-light vigils for a drowned asylum seeker. 

And so what did world media do when reports emerged over the week-end of the German police trying to cover up the rampant sexual abuse of women and children in their newly-popped up tent cities housing the invading Muslim hordes? Why, they mostly ignored it of course.

Just as the police are ignoring it. It's been put into the too-hard basket. 

The do-good'ers of course have a solution. Their answer? Get the women and children out of the camps and into the community:
Campaign group Women For Refugee Women said the solution was to integrate genuine refugees as quickly as possible into society to remove them from the risks of overcrowded conditions. Its director Natasha Walter said: ‘People should not be in detention centres, they should be in the community where they can avail themselves of the normal protections given to citizens by the authorities.’
No, the solution is to send them back to where they came from so that they can go live as per their cultural practices. It is NOT our problem. It is an Islamic problem. 

And this isn't only happening in Germany. At the Jungle Camp in Calais (where they wait to board a truck into the UK), the women are protesting being left in the jungle:
Their little group consists of around 50 women and a handful of young children. They are holding printed sheets of paper which read: 'The Jungle is not for us. The Jungle is for animals.' Their sheets of paper also read: 'I am a secretary'; 'I am a doctor'; I am a scientist’.
These women are from Eritrea, Ethiopia, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Afghanistan. It's a poignant act, meant to tell the outside world, in a very personal way, that they still matter.
Yeah, they really do matter. Back in their homelands, seeing as they're "doctors" and and "scientists". Think about all the good they could be doing back home, instead of racing to jump on trucks into the UK. Go better your own countries back in Africa and the Middle-East. 

Amazing how they all can speak perfect English and type up the same signs, eh? 

Where are our rights, they ask? Back home. 

Netherlands: Grateful asylum seekers complain

Asylum seekers economic migrants at the Ter Apel camp in the Netherlands have complained about feeling “bored”, having to eat bad food and not having fast enough internet.

One man in the video says he should be given money so he can buy cigarettes. 

In June, it was revealed that the Netherlands’ asylum bill had hit a record €870 million a year.That is €870 million a year of wealth created by the Dutch, going on spending for these ungrateful ratbags - ahead of the Dutch citizens. 

No wonder Geert Wilders' party is now in joint first place in the polls. He has warned for years about what compassion will do to Europe. He has warned about the Muslim invasion. He has had to live with armed guards around the clock to keep him alive, because he has dared speak the truth. He has had to put up with his own government and Dutch people ridiculing and vilifying him and his message.

And now Dutchies? Are you still laughing-off Geert, or has the PC scales fallen from your eyes yet?

17 Syrians reported dead as asylum seeker boat sinks off Turkey's coast

Another boat has capsized off the coast of TURKEY, with 17 supposed 'Syrians' drowning, including 5 children.
The boat set off from the Turkish holiday resort town of Bodrum earlier today and was heading to the Greek island of Leros. 

Another 20 "asylum seekers" had life-jackets on and managed to swim back to the Turkish coast. They were taken to the morgue to go identify their drowned relatives.

On board that boat - the journalist quickly points out - (and this is meant to get at your heart strings and make you forget what you're actually reading), was a 3 year old, who also drowned:
Among the dead was a three-year-old boy named Yusuf, who was identified by his grief-stricken Syrian father, state news agency Anatolia said.
Yeah, I would be totally heartbroken, except my heartstrings snapped long ago to this scam. 

So, let's get this straight. A boatload of "asylum seekers" leave from a holiday resort town in safe Turkey, headed for Europe via Greece. No one in the resort town, including the Turkish officials, did anything to stop these people putting the lives of children, including toddlers, at risk. They leave Turkey, most without life-jackets, to head to Europe where the Europeans apparently are going to save them.....

From what exactly? Their safe lives in Turkey? 

Then the boat capsizes pretty close to the Turkish coast, seeing as 20 of them made it back to shore. And the West needs to feel guilty. Al-righty then.

You have to be a complete idiot retard - which the EU bureaucracy clearly is - to think that the current invasion of Europe is anything but a huge onslaught of mostly Muslims and Africans looking for a better (free) life for themselves and their families. Syria is their excuse.

And if you are too stupid and gullible to see it then you belong in the zoo. A mental zoo. With a straitjacket. And a cork in your mouth. For life. 

And to keep this insanity going, the Italian coastguard plucked another 500 'other asylum seekers' from the Mediterranean this weekend. But, that's not all folks. A German navy frigate and a boat run by medical charity Medicines Sans Frontieres (MSF) rescued 140 people from a giant dinghy. 

Gee, you think MSF were just randomly patrolling the Mediterranean, or do you think they have been encouraging these people to come over to Europe? Let's go with the latter scenario, shall we?

And where did these people come from, you ask? 

From the article:
The asylum seekers — who had set sail from Libya three days earlier — mainly came from the west African countries of Nigeria, Ghana, Senegal and Sierra Leone.
Nigeria? Ghana? Senegal? Sierra Leone? Wow, who knew there was so much war going on in that part of Africa, that they had to make their way to Libya to get on boats to Europe. They didn't think to flee south, eh? Over-land to a neighbouring country? Nah. That would be too easy. They much prefer to get on boats and cross an ocean, when most of them can't swim. That makes perfect sense, if you're an economic migrant running to Whites to once again save you.

This is absolute madness.

This could have all been stopped years ago. All Italy had to do was not rush to the rescue of capsized boats, and turn any boats found still floating back to Libya. Simple really. Pretty soon the message would have gone out that if you try to leave by boat, chances are very good you'd be returned to your place of departure, or drown. Pick one. 50-50 chance of being right.

But no. The common sense gene is lacking in the do-good'ers. And in order for the do-good'ers to appear the most compassionate and most morally superior, they put their own countries at risk by encouraging more of the migrants to make the journey. Cooo-eeeeee - come on over! And why wouldn't the Africans risk all when the signals are clear? They know the Italians (and others) are lining up to save them should their boats capsize. And they know they will get to Italy or another European country in the end, because the do-good'ers lack the common sense gene.

Do you think if vice versa happened, that these people would rush to save Europeans? Would they send boats to save people drowning? Errr... no.

So far over 500 000 invaders have made it to Europe this year alone. Let's guess how many more will make it by the end of the year. There are millions in Africa and the Middle-East watching and waiting to join their pals. Germany is expecting upwards of 800 000 this year alone. Next year they can double the numbers if Commie Merkel isn't stopped.

And then you ask yourself just why are anti-immigrant political parties are on the rise in Europe these days? Yes, it is a huge mystery, seeing as the media keeps telling us that most European countries welcome the invasion of 'asylum seekers'. Those countries who don't - such as Hungary - are just full of horrid evil racist White supremacists.

So it should be no surprise then that there are hardly any media reports of anti-immigrant rallies or any reports of unhappy citizens. No, according to the media, Europe is hunky-dory and ecstatic with the status quo.

Except, when you scratch the surface the truth quickly emerges. Take Germany for example, where the media have put a news blackout on any reports of the protests happening around the country.

Thank goodness the media doesn't have the monopoly on reporting these days. Thankfully we have other avenues to get the truth out and heard. 

Below is a video of tens of thousands of protesters in Dresden last week, protesting the invasion of Germany by Muslims. The protest was organised by Pegida, which Angela Merkel has labeled 'racist haters'. That's what you're called these days when you're a patriot and concerned about the future of your country, when your leader is knowingly, and without permission, importing a hostile Islamic culture to live in your neighbourhoods. 

In the video you will notice that all the lights of the surrounding buildings are off and that protesters are holding their own lights. This is because the city councils wherever Pegida protests, switch off the lights of public buildings. That sure has stopped Pegida. Yes sirree.

Every week their protesting numbers rise so keep switching off those lights Angela.

25 September 2015

Pope preaches to let illegal immigrants into USA

Today, the Pope stood in the US Congress and begged the USA to be more compassionate to immigrants crossing the southern border into the country. They are 'pilgrim's, he said.

As if America hasn't been very compassionate to these 'pilgrims' for decades. The amount of money that has been spent on welfare for immigrants and refugees has helped put the country into $19 trillion debt.

Yet, the Vatican, where the political activist Marxist Pope resides in safety, is protected by the Aurelian Walls of Rome. Tear down those walls Pope Judas!

Oh, and that "refugee" family of 4 the Pope has so kindly taken in, they're from a branch of Catholicism, and not even Muslim.

Yeah, Pope, we'll follow your lead in whatever you do. Take an air-conditioned plane while preaching about global warming - gotcha. Live in a fortress city with guards and away from the Muslim hordes - gotcha. Talk about the poor while living in opulence - gotcha. Preach about poverty of others while keeping all the family jewels - gotcha.

Hypocrisy, they name is Pope Judas.

Aurelian Walls surrounding Rome

The Emperor's Moral Narcissism

Great article by the ever truthful Mark Steyn below about the madness of Germany and importing hundreds of thousands of young Muslim males.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel has been fretting about Germany's declining demographics since she was voted in. 

In 1965 the birth rate in Germany was 2.9 per woman. Today it's 1.3. Angela Merkel has no children herself...... 

Yeah, I'm not sure what the answer is to a low birth rate (actually I do), but importing millions of Muslims and Africans would not be my first solution. Pretty soon they will outnumber the Germans and then Germany won't be German again. It will be Germanistan. 

Take South Africa as an example. At the turn of the previous century the Black population stood at around 1 million and the White population around 500 000 thousand. By 1994, there were 32 million Blacks and 5 million Whites. This all achieved under Apartheid, where a paternalistic view was taken by the White government towards the Blacks, and their numbers thrived as a result. The White population, which had to pay for the upkeep of the Blacks and therefore limited the number of children they had, stagnated and now falls. 

If you don't have a next generation, then you can't be an economic leader, and that's what Germany is all about. Appearances and influence. Apparently Merkel thinks that replacing a German ethnic population with 3rd world'ers will have no influence down the line. Maybe she should go look at Sweden and the education standards there, now that the Swedish government has all but given up on the native Swedish population and imported millions of Muslims/Africans to replace them and soothe their White-achievement guilt. Hint: Education is no longer good in Sweden. It's starting to look like the standards from their immigrant's home countries. Fancy that, eh?

This is what a post-Christian world looks like. For years you had the Lefties destroying and undermining the importance of Christianity. As a result, people no longer had to answer to a higher power and became self-indulgent, wanting to "enjoy their lives" more than they wanted to have children. Having children, apparently, isn't conducive to a fun life. It's too much hard work, and you have to, like, wake up early and stuff. 

Add to that the feminist movement, which preached the anti-male religion fervently. According to them, if you married and had children, you were a slave of the male. Rather take contraceptives and sleep around - enjoy yourselves - than shackle yourself to one male and be a breeding mare for him. The males were very appreciative. No longer did they have to buy the cow to get the milk. Now they could sleep around and stay single.

And if you did get pregnant, the feminists told you to abort your mistake. No worries mate.

I can almost guarantee you that countries with high birth rates these days don't have women's rights, abortion or issues with marriage. It is only the West which suffers from this feminist cancer. The West couldn't see that either the entire world adopts the contraceptive, abortion and no marriage religion, or no country should. As a result, you have the current imbalance, where the West is childless and the rest of the world are breeding like rabbits, and then sending their offspring to the West to look after, raise and suffer the consequence.

As a result, the birth rate of the White race has fallen all around the world. In order for the childless to enjoy their jet-setting lives, they work hard to afford such a life, which usually leads to prosperity. As countries get prosperous, welfare abounds, and in order to fund the welfare state, governments have to take even more away from the earners in the form of taxes. This in turn discourages others from having children as they can't afford them. 

It's a case of the West causing their own demise through greed, welfare and shortsighted policies.

And the created prosperity by the White race - off the backs of barren nations -  is what the 3rd world now wants and feels entitled to. White-guilt is used to shame Western countries into self-destruction. 

So, in the 3rd world'ers stream, into a weak Europe and other White-run countries, with their culture, their empty Muslim wombs and testosterone-fueled young males, ready to have children, as long as others pay to feed, clothe and educate them.

This is the conclusion of the Left's decades-long suicidal policies. Add to that the encouragement and 'normalisation' of homosexuality, and you sit with a White race which will all but cease to exist within the next century.

The mass replacement of the intelligent White race with their noble savages. 

And we have but ourselves to blame. We allowed the imbecilic Left to shape our future.

Isn't it ironic that non-White races want to live where Whites are, breed with them, live off their achievements, but the end result will be the demise of the race they so covet? 

If anyone wants to see what a world looks like where there are no longer White people, have a look at sub-Saharan Africa for a hint of the future. 

Glad I won't be around to see it.

Twelve years ago, it was said that the western armies in Iraq would be welcomed as liberators. (They were - for a while.) Today in Germany, another conquering army are being welcomed as liberators - liberators from the residual moral stain of what remains of ethnic nationalism and cultural identity. Watching European news broadcasts right now is like an insane demotic inversion of the Emperor's new clothes. "To a fool these thousands of fit young Muslim men appear well dressed and well fed. But a wise man such as Your Majesty can easily see that they are desperate starving refugees in rags." And so as the trains pull in to German railway stations to disgorge men who meet no known definition of "refugees" they are greeted on the platform by volunteers offering food and second-hand clothes. The cameras do their best to alight on a telegenic moppet or a covered woman, but, even when they do, you notice that they're surrounded by a sea of confident vigorous males - who, according to the UN, make up 75 per cent of the "refugees".

That would be an unusual demographic distortion in most emergency situations. If 75 per cent of the Titanic's survivors had been men who'd left their women and children back on the ship, there might have been a few disapproving comments. But not here. And why complain that the Syrian refugees aren't really "refugees"? After all, they're not Syrian either. Only one in five of the arriving migrants are Syrians fleeing the implosion of their country.

To be sure, there are a lot of Syrian refugees. One in four people in Lebanon right now is a displaced Syrian. That's the equivalent of America taking in 100 million Mexicans - or Canadians, if there were such a thing as 100 million Canadians. But the vast majority of those marching across the Continent to the bountiful welfare states of the north-west are economic migrants lured by western weakness:
The 35-year-old mother of three is from Ghana. She says she came to Germany for economic reasons and is waiting to hear about her visa status. Her children attend the local school, and she wants to settle in Friedland for their sake.
"I want my children to have a bright future," Amoah says. "My first child says she wants to be a doctor and the second one a lawyer. My prayers are that their dream should come true."
There is no civil war in Ghana. But, if you're a 35-year-old single mother, Friedland beats Accra. Not everyone wants to be a doctor or a lawyer, but, like Ms Amoah, the "Syrian" "refugees" have grasped that picking out which European nation to settle in is like choosing universities. 

Hungarian PM defends his country against hordes of illegal immigrants

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán made a very good speech in parliament a few days ago, explaining his views and actions he's taking regarding the illegal immigrant invasion into Europe.

As the PM says, Europe is rich, but it is weak, which makes for a very bad situation, as the migrants see them as pushovers. And he isn't wrong.

Together with being weak, add that the EU is run by globalist Lefties who don't think borders are necessary - or culture, or traditions, or maintaining what others have worked and died for to achieve - a safe, successful region.

Viktor Orbán is one of the few pro-Western, Christian leaders in Europe, willing to stand up and defend his country against the hordes of unwashed third-world riff-raff who are trying to get into Europe to live the sweet life on the backs of others hard work. With them they bring their backward cultures, their conflicts and their 7th century ideology and cult of Islam.

It is extremely frustrating to see that not one other European country has dared asked why these economic migrants are fleeing their homelands. Why are they not forced to defend it and fight for it. Why is Europe willing to give these deserters a ready excuse to invade Europe, instead of forcing them to sort out the mess in their home countries. 

If they are never forced to make change happen in their own countries, the causes of the problems will exist forever - meaning that there will now be a steady stream of economic migrants into weak Europe. The signal has gone out and the call has been heard.

This is common sense, but apparently only radical right-wing extremists are able to see it. That's what the Lefties and 'human rights advocates' call anyone who is concerned about the mass immigration of people from 3rd world non-White hell-holes into White-run countries who have done all the hard work to be successful and safe.

Our race is weak these days. No pride and much too nice for our own good.

Watch a very impressive man give a very impressive speech below (subtitles in English). If only there were more like him. 

The Left have attacked him since 2010, when they recognised that he wasn't one of them. It isn't difficult to understand why.

24 September 2015

Pope Francis Judas denies he's a Leftist

Pope Judas, a Lefty fascist communist? 

Why, that's just crazy talk.

South Africa: Reporting on crime encourages crime: SABC COO

So, there's an IQ67 by the name of Hlaudi Motsoeneng, who is Chief Operating Officer of the SABC - the South African Broadcasting Corporation (tax funded).

It is unclear if Mr Motsoeneng has passed high school, seeing as most employees at the SABC tend to be dumb-as-a-bag-of-rocks ANC cadres who lie on their CV's, who then get promoted into positions they know nothing about, when they are more fit to clean toilets (barely). But, judging from the interview below, Mr Motsoeneng seems to be more fit to be a brick in the wall, than COO of anything.

You see, Mr Motsoeneng is worried about the media and how it's not regulated in SA. I'm guessing he'd like the ANC to regulate the media, so that South Africans can be blissfully unaware of what's happening in the country. It's like asking the fox to guard the chickens. But, Mr Motsoeneng doesn't seem to understand the conflict of interest. He sees nothing wrong with his views. He is, after all, COO of a media outlet, calling on others to be regulated - just a he regulates what the SABC reports.

Here is the majestic Mr Motsoeneng on what the role of the media is:
“Maybe we need to understand the role of media. The role of media is to influence the mindset of people, young and old."
So, there you have it. It is the role of the media to influence people, and not to report 
facts and truth. Influencing would be called, errrrr...... propaganda in my book, but what do I know? Mr Motsoeneng is far more enlightened than I am - obviously.

Under his regulation leadership, the SABC has been instructed to report news which is 70% positive. Just ignore the negative. If you don't report it, it somehow doesn't exist in the tiny mind of Mr Motsoeneng.

He went on to clarify his stance:
"Let’s take example [sic] – the young ones. If you always put crime on media, you report about crime… actually what you are doing you are encouraging young people to commit crime.” 
When the interviewer asked what happens when you report on corruption, does the same principle apply, the honorable Mr Motsoeneng looked like a deer caught in headlights. The lights were on, but no one was home. 

What type of corruption, he eventually asked?

Errr..... corruption. Any and all corruption, you nincompoop. There are no degrees of corruption - except in the ANC.

Mr Motsoeneng quickly changed track by fetching Nkandla and the false reporting of the corruption surrounding the palatial housing complex built by SA president Jacob Zuma, on the back of the tax payers - to the tune of R250 million (~$25 million):
“You have 10 houses, someone come and build five houses – it is 15 houses, but you combined those houses together – you are misleading people. Because what you need to focus on, is you have these houses that have been built. You also have new houses. You need to separate the two.”
Yes, let me remind you once again, this is the COO of the SABC speaking. The twit doesn't even realise that it would look a whole lot better if Zuma had built 15 houses for R250 million, instead of only 5 'new' buildings for that money. Ahhhhhhhhh!

If you would like to watch a comedy show, then please go ahead and view the interview (in English). It gets pretty funny from the 6 minute mark when he's asked for a recent example of the media getting it wrong. 

The interviewer tried hard not to smirk at the fool throughout.