31 January 2014

Sure bet.........








Kick Obama day....









Hot tip!!!! Amagudwane (spiritual Rats)

Here is an actual advert to be found on Gumtree in South Africa (almost like Craigslist in America).

It's all about Amagudwane - or spiritual rats. These rats are very wise and intelligent and a money machine! They will bring you other people's money "slowly by slowly. 

That's not all! Phone now and you will get a rat that can "do anything invisibly without anybody to see or notice it."

But wait! If you call now, these rats will be able to trace and detect anybody / anything lost from anywhere / any place. It's practically a soldier! 

You can buy or hire them. BONUS!

Gee, I wonder if Zuma has heard of these amazing spiritual rats? He could replace the entire South African military with rat-soldiers. They're sure to perform better than the riff-raff currently entrusted to protect the country and I'm betting they'll eat less and behave better.

So dear South African readers - don't forget to give them a call TODAY! to order your rats or you may just miss out on this amazing once-in-a-life-time opportunity!


Hat tip: Socrates





Amagudwane (spiritual Rats) you purchase them after making rituals and take them to your place while they go around banks ,places where people keep there cash and start to bring it to the owner slowly by slowly . these type of spiritual rats are very wise and intelligent you cant beat their knowledge of understanding and senses ,really they are money machine. BUY OR HIRE SPIRITUAL RATS TO MAKE CLEAN MONEY IN A SHORT TIME.. CALL: +27735245869. FOR MORE INFORMATION. It is also known as an invisible spiritual jinn’s which can do anything invisibly without anybody to see or notice it. 

It is also an amazing spirit which can trace and detect anybody / anything lost from anywhere / any place.

It is a practical security soldier which is reliable for protecting and fighting for its own boss without even needing a gun or any security individuals for that.

If you need to make or own risky deals/businesses properly, surely you need it.

Source

NORWAY: New right wing government is kicking out foreign criminals, most of them Muslims

At last! Hallelujah.

There is at least ONE Scandinavian country willing to tackle the immigration problem - Norway!

The new conservative government will hopefully continue with this good start. It's amazing what an election does to governments. The previous government decided to tackle crime by stepping up deportations, but it still didn't save them as the new conservative government was voted in last October.

Hmmmmm.....I wonder if Tony Abbott winning in Australia influenced how the Norwegians voted?? There's a conservative wave building across Europe - people are SICK and TIRED of idiotic cultural-suicide progressive policies.

In 2013, Norway deported 5198 foreigners, up from 3958 in 2012. Most of those deported were Nigerians, Afghans, Iraqi's and Moroccans. 

Boy, what a surprise! All either Black Africans or Muslim third-worldes....... 

We have to be hopeful that the more these liberal-run countries bash their heads on "multi-culturalism", the quicker they wake up. 

I'm hoping Australia is also going to wake up sooner rather than later, as we'll also have a Muslim problem one day. Our current government has at least started securing our borders to stop the influx of the phony Muslim "asylum seeker" country shopping boat people. It's a start....

In any case, well done Norway. Keep going. Lots more still to deport.

Just waiting for the bleeding-heart squad to start shouting xenophobia and racists! Bound to happen....3...2....1.....


Hat tip: Mark L and South African N


Meanwhile in England.........





A record number of foreign citizens were deported from Norway last year, after country's police stepped up the use of deportation as a way of fighting crime.

Some 5,198 foreign citizens were expelled from the country in 2013, an increase of 31 percent since 2012, when 3,958 people were deported.  

"It is the highest number we've had ever," Frode Forfang, head of the Directorate of Immigration (UDI), told NRK. "We believe that one reason for the increase is that the police have become more conscious of using deportation as a tool to fight crime." 

Nigerian citizens topped the list of those expelled for committing crimes, with 232 citizens expelled as a punishment in 2013, followed by Afghan citizens with 136 expelled as a punishment, and 76 Moroccans expelled as a punishment. 

Afghan citizens topped the list of those expelled for violating the Immigration Act, with 380 expelled for this reason, followed by Iraqi citizens, 234 were expelled for violating the act.

Source

Zimbabwe adopts Chinese yuan as currency

More and more countries are moving away from trading only in the US dollar, and Zimbabwe joins the crowd.

They are now accepting the Chinese yuan and three other Asian currencies. Not that their economy is anything to brag about....

The US dollar is being severely manipulated by the USA Fed, printing fake money monthly like there's no tomorrow. And the only reason the US dollar hasn't emulated what happened to the Zim $ when they did the same in 2008, is that the US dollar is readily accepted around the world thanks to good old American credibility that was built by previous generations.

You will recall that the enthusiastic printing of the Zimbabwe dollar by Mugarbage caused hyperinflation and their dollar reached nearly 90 sextillion in 2008. That's a 9 with 22 zeros. In 2009 they abandoned their dollar in favor of the South African rand and US dollar.

The US dollar is going to crash in the near future. One year? Two years? Who knows, but probably within the next 5 years at most. There are signs that it's going to get real ugly so I would suggest if economics isn't your strong point, then start reading and informing yourself. A good starter blog is Zero Hedge. (if anyone knows of any other good, easy to understand financial blogs then please list in the comments section)

So, is Zimbabwe moving to the Chinese yuan to put their feet in both camps, or have their Chinese masters given them instructions to do so??

It's an open secret that China and Russia are going to float a gold-backed currency in competition to the US dollar. When is anyone's guess. So while you're told that gold is no longer a safe investment, please know that behind the scenes China and Russia are buying up all the gold they can and stockpiling it for the near future. China is extremely secretive with how much physical gold they have, but I wouldn't be surprised if they've surpassed the USA by now. 

The only reason the Americans and Europeans want you to think gold is uncool, is because they need the US$ and Euro to remain strong. If people flock to gold or other currencies, then their ponzi scheme comes toppling down.

They appear calm on the surface, but under the water they're like ducks - kicking like crazy!

So, start making your contingency plans. You know it makes sense.


Hat tip: DR




Zimbabwe's central bank has announced it would accept the Chinese yuan and three other Asian currencies as legal tender as economic relations have improved in recent years.

"Trade and investment ties between Zimbabwe, China, India, Japan and Australia have grown appreciably," said Charity Dhliwayo, acting governor of the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe.

Exporters and the public can now open accounts in yuans, Australian dollars, Indian rupees and Japanese yens, Dhliwayo said. Zimbabwe abandoned its worthless currency in 2009.

It accepts the US dollar and the South African rand as the main legal tender. Their use has helped to stabilise the economy after world-record inflation threw it into a tailspin.

Independent economist Chris Mugaga said the introduction of the Asian currencies would not make a huge difference to Zimbabwe's struggling economy.

"It is Zimbabwe's Look East Policy, which has forced this, and nothing else," he said.

President Robert Mugabe has sought to boost economic relations with Asia after his relations with the West came under strain over his policy of seizing white-owned farms.

Chinese investors have over the past two decades entered diamond mining, construction and retail sectors in the south-east African country.

Source

The skunk......

Pretty accurate, no?






UK: 'No winners' rule in junior rugby sparks mini-revolution

Following closely on from yesterday's blog post about a loopy self-hating White liberal doing yoga, comes the next edition of the wonderful world of Liberalism.

This time we swing to England, where the Rugby Football Union (RFU) in conjunction with Surrey Rugby last week issued a new set of rules for tournaments for all age groups under-11 - namely that their competitions must have no winners and that if they are losing a match, the teams will have to be mixed-up at half time:
The key components are that tournaments will no longer have a winner, they will be round-robin only. Coaches must meet before each match to try to pick evenly matched teams and if any matches are proving too "one-sided" then coaches will be forced to "adjust" their teams at halftime to make them closer. Teams will no longer be streamed on ability but will play all matches with mixed ability groups.
I kid you not.

Can you imagine being a young boy (or girl), training hard for a rugby tournament, knowing that no one was allowed to be crowned the winner at the end of the day? And that if the score were to blow-out your awesome team would have to be changed-up so that you weren't stronger than their lousy team??

And what happens when you don't follow these  rules?
Teams who fail to follow the new guidelines will see all their club's age-group sides thrown out of the tournament and face further disciplinary action.
So, what's the reaction been from coaches, teachers and parents?
The new "no losers" approach is already drawing widespread condemnation and ridicule. Particularly under-fire is the concept of teams being changed mid-match, seemingly removing the whole concept of fighting back against adversity which underpins the very nature of sport.
And so it should be ridiculed and mocked. It's Liberalism with their everyone-gets-a-participation-medal concept gone mad on steroids. The reason people play sport is to enjoy themselves and bash the other team in the process. And if you happen to the be losers, you pick yourself up, dust yourself off and you go in harder and smarter the next match!

One club has already withdrawn from the Surrey Tournament in protest. Well, where's the other self-respecting teams????

The British press have gone to town:
British newspapers have also been quick to pour scorn on the concept, with a common theme being the question of how the likes of New Zealand and South Africa must be laughing from afar.
Yeah, I'm pretty sure teams in South Africa and New Zealand would never consider this type of social engineering. Here in Australia my boys went through junior rugby ranks - playing against many HUGE Pacific Islander teams, where the boys were double the size of the White boys - and they never thought about giving up. They got smarter - and bigger - every year and by the time they reached the mid-teen teams they were beating the Islander teams with their brains and heart, while the bigger Islander boys struggled to keep up. And boy did they celebrate when they eventually beat those teams. Payback was sweet.

Maybe English rugby should go back in time where boys played rugby like real boys. Maybe, just maybe, then they'll be able to field a team with some real men at the next World Cup and actually win a few matches!

 Same with cricket....


Hey!! YOU with the ball!! Slow down! Let him catch you.....don't hurt his feelings!

As Stuart Lancaster makes his final Six Nations preparations, England's next generation of budding rugby internationals have been told that their competitions must have no winners and that if they are losing a match, the teams will have to be changed.

While England prepare at their usual base in Surrey, the county finds itself on the frontline of a philosophical battle about competitive matches in junior or "mini" rugby.

The Rugby Football Union (RFU) in conjunction with Surrey Rugby last week issued a new set of rules for tournaments for all age groups under-11 that left many parents and coaches initially thinking they were the victims of a spoof.

The key components are that tournaments will no longer have a winner, they will be round-robin only. Coaches must meet before each match to try to pick evenly matched teams and if any matches are proving too "one-sided" then coaches will be forced to "adjust" their teams at halftime to make them closer. Teams will no longer be streamed on ability but will play all matches with mixed ability groups.

Teams who fail to follow the new guidelines will see all their club's age-group sides thrown out of the tournament and face further disciplinary action.

Most minis tournaments are already played on a round-robin basis, with all teams playing four or five matches and the top four or two from competing groups then going on to play semi-finals or a final.

Win, lose or draw all their games, most competing players go home with a "taking part" medal while the winners take the trophy.

Tournaments are usually streamed into 'A' 'B' or 'C/development' levels, so children of similar standards play against each other.

"NO LOSERS"

Hugely popular with children, parents and coaches, the current structure is to be replaced by the new "no losers" approach that is already drawing widespread condemnation and ridicule. Particularly under-fire is the concept of teams being changed mid-match, seemingly removing the whole concept of fighting back against adversity which underpins the very nature of sport.

Rosslyn Park, a hugely successful south-west London club currently boasting between 60 and 80 children in each age group, has already announced its withdrawal from the Surrey Tournament, where the new rules are to be introduced, while many other clubs are canvassing their members for their views.

British newspapers have also been quick to pour scorn on the concept, with a common theme being the question of how the likes of New Zealand and South Africa must be laughing from afar.

A comment piece headlined "must try less hard" in the Daily Telegraph said the move "seems redolent of the heyday of the equality-obsessed 'loony Left'.

"Is such earnestness appropriate for mini-rugby played by eight-year-olds? ('Look here, Smith Minor, you may be pleased you scored that try, but did you stop to think what it might do to the self-esteem of the chaps you thrashed?') And there is a serious drawback to this: misplaced egalitarianism risks denying non-academic children the valuable opportunity of excelling on the sports field. Youngsters, whether playing rugby or Angry Birds, thrive on competition. A 'game' where no one wins is not much fun."

The RFU, however, defends the changes, which it says have been introduced as a way to limit the number of children leaving the sport

Steve Grainger, the RFU's development director, who has suddenly become more in-demand than Lancaster, said they were drawn up after a long consultation period and did not send the message that winning is wrong.

"The tournaments will still have matches which are won or lost but this is about removing the 'win-at-all-costs mentality' which is creeping into the game," Grainger said.

"That can lead to coaches not giving all players a game, just choosing their best players to try to win the tournament, and that will drive kids out of the sport."

Grainger said that it is often the parents on the sidelines who yearn for decisive matches, rather than the children involved, but a straw poll carried out at a Surrey club by Reuters at the weekend found little support for the concept.

Presented with the new tournament rules while battling through the mud and rain on a freezing Sunday morning training session, the overwhelming response from Richmond under-8s was a simple: "that's rubbish."

Source

30 January 2014

USA: GOP CRAFTS PLAN TO WRECK THE COUNTRY, LOSE VOTERS

Lots of statistics in the article below from Ann Coulter, but it's important to keep reading through it all to get a sense of what America will be facing soon.

Basically White America is fuc.....errr.....over.

The two largest immigrant groups into America these days are Hispanics and Asians. "Asians" includes Indians, Arabs/Muslims and the real Asians from the East.

Every year America takes in 1.1 million new immigrants, with the vast majority being non-White, low-skilled, low IQ 3rd worlders. Add to this the nearly 30 million illegal aliens already in the country - mostly Hispanic/Latino - and you can see what's going to happen in a few years time.

However, the most noticeable statistic below is how immigrants view America. In short, they don't identify with what America stands for historically, but they love them their BIG government. They are against gun-rights and don't believe in the Constitution. Why should they? They have no loyalty to the country seeing as they're waved in enthusiastically to get them some of that free stuff Obama et al so generously give away. 

Oh, and the majority of the new immigrants vote Democrat.

The Immigration Act of 1965 is to blame. Under a push from the Democrats - and Ted Kennedy - the country adopted a new immigration policy in 1965, which transformed a nation 85% White in 1965 into one that’s one-third minority today, and on track for a non-White majority by 2042.

Before the act, immigration visas were apportioned based on the demographic breakdown that existed at the time of the 1920 Census—meaning that there were few if any limits on immigrants from Western and Northern Europe, but strict quotas on those from elsewhere. Though President Lyndon Johnson, in signing the bill, tried to reassure opponents that it wouldn't do much to change the balance of immigration, its impact was dramatic.

In the 1950s, 53% of all immigrants were Europeans and just 6 percent were Asians; by the 1990s, just 16% were Europeans and 31% were Asians. The percentages of Latino and African immigrants also jumped significantly.

And now America is so diversified that Whites will be a minority in their own country in less than 30 years time. America is the land of the free.......falling.

And there are traitors within the Republican party who want some more cheap labour for their pals. Why else would they be pushing for amnesty for the millions of illegals in the country?? It's political party suicide. But, no one seems to care what the real Americans want or don't want.

I've been blogging for years about what will happen to White America if people don't frigging wake up. Day after day I read "conservatives" saying they aren't racist as they don't see skin colour. Well, that may be true, but the non-Whites sure see skin colour so it's time to wakey wakey the f-up. Time to smell the coffee and the roses sunshine! Time to admit that NO ONE LOVES AMERICA MORE than the White people of America. 

If you're prepared to give your country up - your freedoms, your history, your accomplishments - then don't worry about the demographic freight train coming. Go stick your head back in the kumbaya sands and start learning Spanish or Mandarin.

Everyone else, panic!





As House Republicans prepare to sell out the country on immigration this week, Phyllis Schlafly has produced a stunning report on how immigration is changing the country. The report is still embargoed, but someone slipped me a copy, and it's too important to wait. 

Leave aside the harm cheap labor being dumped on the country does to the millions of unemployed Americans. What does it mean for the Republican Party? 

Citing surveys from the Pew Research Center, the Pew Hispanic Center, Gallup, NBC News, Harris polling, the Annenberg Policy Center, Latino Decisions, the Center for Immigration Studies and the Hudson Institute, Schlafly's report overwhelmingly demonstrates that merely continuing our current immigration policies spells doom for the Republican Party. 

Immigrants -- all immigrants -- have always been the bulwark of the Democratic Party. For one thing, recent arrivals tend to be poor and in need of government assistance. Also, they're coming from societies that are far more left-wing than our own. History shows that, rather than fleeing those policies, they bring their cultures with them. (Look at what New Yorkers did to Vermont.) 

This is not a secret. For at least a century, there's never been a period when a majority of immigrants weren't Democrats. 

At the current accelerated rate of immigration -- 1.1 million new immigrants every year -- Republicans will be a fringe party in about a decade. 

Thanks to endless polling, we have a pretty good idea of what most immigrants believe. 

According to a Harris poll, 81 percent of native-born citizens think the schools should teach students to be proud of being American. Only 50 percent of naturalized U.S. citizens do. 

While 67 percent of native-born Americans believe our Constitution is a higher legal authority than international law, only 37 percent of naturalized citizens agree. 

No wonder they vote 2-1 for the Democrats.

The two largest immigrant groups, Hispanics and Asians, have little in common economically, culturally or historically. But they both overwhelmingly support big government, Obamacare, affirmative action and gun control. 

According the 2012 National Asian American Survey, as well as a Kaiser Foundation poll, only 40 percent of the general public holds a favorable opinion of Obamacare, 42 percent unfavorable. Meanwhile, 51 percent of Asians have a favorable opinion of Obamacare, 18 percent an unfavorable one. Even Koreans support Obamacare by 57 percent to 17 percent. 

Overall, 69 percent of immigrants like Obamacare, according to a 2010 Cooperative Congressional Election Study. 

That same survey showed that only 35 percent of native-born Americans support affirmative action, compared to 58 percent of immigrants, including -- amazingly -- 64 percent of Asians (suggesting they may not be as smart as everyone thinks). 

Also surprising, a Pew Research Center poll of all Hispanics, immigrant and citizen alike, found that Hispanics take a dimmer view of capitalism than even people who describe themselves as "liberal Democrats." While 47 percent of self-described "liberal Democrats" hold a negative view of capitalism, 55 percent of Hispanics do. 

Pew also found that only 27 percent of Hispanics support gun rights, compared to 57 percent of non-Hispanic whites. According to Latino Decisions, large majorities of Hispanics favor a national database of gun owners, limiting the capacity of magazines and a ban on semiautomatic weapons. 

Seventy-five percent of Hispanic immigrants and 55 percent of Asian immigrants support bigger government -- also according to Pew. Even after three generations in America, Hispanics still support bigger government 55 percent to 36 percent, compared to the general public, which opposes bigger government 48 percent to 41 percent. 

How are Republicans going to square that circle? It's not their position on amnesty that immigrants don't like; it's Republicans' support for small government, gun rights, patriotism, the Constitution and capitalism. 

Reading these statistics, does anyone wonder why Democrats think vastly increasing immigration should be the nation's No. 1 priority? 

It would be one thing if the people with these views already lived here. Republicans would have no right to say, "You can't vote." But why on Earth are they bringing in people sworn to their political destruction? 

Republicans have no obligation to assist the Democrats as they change the country in a way that favors them electorally, particularly when it does great harm to the people already here. 

Yes, it's great for the most powerful Americans to have lots of cheap, unskilled labor. Immigration definitely solves the rich's "servant problem." 

(Approximately 5 million times a day, MSNBC expresses bewilderment that any Republicans oppose amnesty when it's supported by the Chamber of Commerce. Wow! So even people who profit by flooding the country with cheap labor are in favor of flooding the country with cheap labor!) 

It's terrific for ethnic lobbyists whose political clout will skyrocket the more foreign-born Americans we have. 

And it's fantastic for the Democrats, who are well on their way to a permanent majority, so they can completely destroy the last remnants of what was once known as "the land of the free." 

The only ones opposed to our current immigration policies are the people. 

But are they going to give John Boehner a job when he's no longer House speaker, as some big business lobbyist will? 

Will they help Marco Rubio run for president on the claim that, as a Cuban, he can appeal to Hispanics? (Fat chance.) 

Will they bundle contributions for Eric Cantor's re-election, as well-heeled donors will? 

Will they be enough to re-elect Kevin McCarthy to Congress so he can keep his gold-plated government health insurance? 

Will they be the ones writing Darrell Issa's flattering New York Times obituary? 

Sorry, Americans. You lose. 

Source

Australia: The ABC Is Out Of Control

For Australian readers who are tired of the bias and anti-Australian sentiments voiced by the ABC daily, please visit THIS website to sign the petition to Malcolm Turnbull.

Spread the word among your friends. It's time for the ABC to shut-up or get shut down.





San Francisco?








South Africa: Lindiwe Mazibuko in insulting attack on Afrikaner DA supporters

Ms. Lindiwe Mazibuko, parliamentary leader of the Democratic Alliance (DA) has said that the DA has to get rid of White nationalists in the party.

There you have it. What I've always said - that the DA is just using Whites for votes and won't hesitate to throw them under the bus first chance they get. And now that they're transforming the party into a Black party, so does the Bantu genes emerge. Because what Ms Mazibuko is saying - in Black-talk- is that Whites who don't hate their White skin are the problem, not only in the party, but in the country.

According to Ms Mazibuko, the DA has a changing face. She clearly forgets that it was White people who voted for them, making them the Opposition to the ANC. It wasn't the Black vote. It was the White vote. White people who stupidly voted thinking that the DA would at least protect the White minority in the country. Now that Aunty Botox Zille has dropped her mask and shown her true colours and her Marxist anti-White face, how many Whites will vote for her precious DA? 

Probably too many still. Most of them will be Liberal/Progressives or from the camp of "let's vote for the DA because they aren't the ANC and believe in the rainbow nation". Let me remind you that there is no white in a rainbow. But, if you mix the rainbow colours together you'll get a shade that's close to black...

The DA has given up all pretense of being in opposition and is in fact ANC-lite. They believe in and support ANC policies. They are FOR Affirmative Action and BEE. They are NOT interested in the plight of the Afrikaners.

Aunty Botox has done everything in her power to African-ize the DA. And to achieve this she has to ensure that Blacks clearly see that she isn't about White interests. Pretty soon the DA will be run by "moderate" racist Blacks, trying to win over the other "moderate" racist Blacks in the country - those disillusioned with the ANC. 

And at the end of the day, they will cannibalise their White voters.


Hat tip: DR




White nationalists not welcome in DA - Mazibuko

The remark made by Ms. Lindiwe Mazibuko, parliamentary leader of the DA, that the DA has to get rid of white nationalists, is an insult to those white voters who had seen to it that the DA was made the official opposition in Parliament (see Beeld report). What she is actually saying is that any white voter who is not ashamed of his or her Afrikaner identity, is not welcome in the DA," Dr. Pieter Groenewald (MP), the parliamentary leader of the Freedom Front Plus says.

The offensive remark of Mazibuko was made to the journalist, Donwald Pressly, author of the book Owning the Future: Lindiwe Mazibuko and the Changing Face of the DA.

"It is clear that the new DA does not have room for white nationalism and is undergoing a total change. Mazibuko even bemoans the fact that white voters has supported Tony Leon so strongly because it was only a short-term gain, but to the detriment of the DA in the long run. I now understand why the DA supports race-based affirmative action legislation in Parliament and never says anything in defence of the interests of Afrikaners," Groenewald says.

 "The Freedom Front Plus has never been ashamed to speak out in Parliament in defence of the interests of Afrikaners and we will continue with it," Groenewald said.

Statement issued by Dr. Pieter Groenewald, FF Plus parliamentary leader, January 21 2014

Source

THERE ARE NO BLACK PEOPLE IN MY YOGA CLASSES AND I'M SUDDENLY FEELING UNCOMFORTABLE WITH IT

Who wants to read a real story showing how idiotic Liberals are?

Then please read the article below.

It's a story about some skinny White girl who attends yoga classes. One day "a young, fairly heavy black woman" put her mat behind her "skinny white girl body", and before long the Black gal dropped to her hands and knees and gave up on the class.

If this were a White girl who "gave up", then there wouldn't be an article. 

But, because it was a Black woman - bingo! The Liberal inside our skinny navel-gazing White gal came to the fore:
I thought about how even though yoga comes from thousands of years of south Asian tradition, it’s been shamelessly co-opted by Western culture as a sport for skinny, rich white women. 
I realized with horror that despite the all-inclusivity preached by the studio, despite the purported blindness to socioeconomic status, despite the sizeable population of regular Asian students, black students were few and far between. And in the large and constantly rotating roster of instructors, I could only ever remember two being black.
Yeah, it must be due to racism that Blacks don't do yoga. Or....it could be that they just don't enjoy it, you stupid blathering idiot. 

But, it gets better.
I thought about how that must feel: to be a heavyset black woman entering for the first time a system that by all accounts seems unable to accommodate her body. What could I do to help her? If I were her, I thought, I would want as little attention to be drawn to my despair as possible—I would not want anyone to look at me or notice me. And so I tried to very deliberately avoid looking in her direction each time I was in downward dog, but I could feel her hostility just the same. 
Hmmmm, what could she do to help her? Maybe concentrate on your damn yoga and leave the Black woman alone? Or how about stop using your few brains cells to turn everything into a race issue? 

But no....... 
Trying to ignore it only made it worse. I thought about what the instructor could or should have done to help her. Would a simple “Are you okay?” whisper have helped, or would it embarrass her?
Haha, these Liberals are mentally retarded. YOU are the embarrassment! The Black woman was probably thinking that if that skanky White biatch looks at me with tears in her eyes ONCE MORE....! If only our Black hero knew how anxious she was making the poor darling self-hating Whitey feel she could have taken her to the cleaners. I would have.

But, HERE is the kicker - the summary of everything that is wrong with these farking dumb nut-jobs:
I got home from that class and promptly broke down crying. Yoga, a beloved safe space that has helped me through many dark moments in over six years of practice, suddenly felt deeply suspect. Knowing fully well that one hour of perhaps self-importantly believing myself to be the deserving target of a racially charged anger is nothing, is largely my own psychological projection, is a drop in the bucket, is the tip of the iceberg in American race relations, I was shaken by it all the same.
I think my IQ just dropped about a thousand points reading this rubbish. That this retard can make a connection between some Black woman not taking part in a yoga class to American race relations is beyond the pale. 

This. Is. Mental. Without a single word being spoken, this gal managed to work herself into an hysteric frenzy, over errr......nothing. I'm surprised she didn't call the suicide hot-line or jump in front of a bus. 

This is, however, a great insight into how the vapid Liberal mind actually works. Hyper emotional, over sensitive to things that don't exist, and the ever present self loathing.

Ah, you gotta love the tiny, tiny, tiny pathetic mind of the paternalistic Liberal. Thanks to this gal I've had my laugh for the day.

And YES, she gets to vote America!



The Liberal brain.....

January is always a funny month in yoga studios: they are inevitably flooded with last year’s repentant exercise sinners who have sworn to turn over a new leaf, a new year, and a new workout regime. A lot of January patrons are atypical to the studio’s regular crowd and, for the most part, stop attending classes before February rolls around.

A few weeks ago, as I settled into an exceptionally crowded midday class, a young, fairly heavy black woman put her mat down directly behind mine. It appeared she had never set foot in a yoga studio—she was glancing around anxiously, adjusting her clothes, looking wide-eyed and nervous. Within the first few minutes of gentle warm-up stretches, I saw the fear in her eyes snowball, turning into panic and then despair. Before we made it into our first downward dog, she had crouched down on her elbows and knees, head lowered close to the ground, trapped and vulnerable. She stayed there, staring, for the rest of the class.

Because I was directly in front of her, I had no choice but to look straight at her every time my head was upside down (roughly once a minute). I’ve seen people freeze or give up in yoga classes many times, and it’s a sad thing, but as a student there’s nothing you can do about it. At that moment, though, I found it impossible to stop thinking about this woman. Even when I wasn’t positioned to stare directly at her, I knew she was still staring directly at me. Over the course of the next hour, I watched as her despair turned into resentment and then contempt. I felt it all directed toward me and my body.


USA: Retirement money confiscation - it's going to happen.....

One of the most chilling things that Obama said yesterday in his State of the Union speech was that he wanted to do "more" to help Americans save for their retirement.

From Obama:
Let’s do more to help Americans save for retirement. Today, most workers don’t have a pension. A Social Security check often isn't enough on its own. And while the stock market has doubled over the last five years, that doesn't help folks who don’t have 401ks. That’s why, tomorrow, I will direct the Treasury to create a new way for working Americans to start their own retirement savings: MyRA. It’s a new savings bond that encourages folks to build a nest egg. MyRA guarantees a decent return with no risk of losing what you put in. And if this Congress wants to help, work with me to fix an upside-down tax code that gives big tax breaks to help the wealthy save, but does little to nothing for middle-class Americans. Offer every American access to an automatic IRA on the job, so they can save at work just like everyone in this chamber can..
Ah, so sweet, he's even given it a name: MyRA. Which will shortly stand for My Ruined Ass.

This from a man who can't even get a website up and running for his great big new mandated healthcare program. A website that will end up costing nearly $1 billion by the time it's almost working.....

ANY Americans reading this post, RUN! Ruuuuuuuuuuuuuuuun when Obama says he wants to help you - for anything. Because the ONLY reason he wants you to put your retirement savings in a government savings bond is so that he can steal the money whenever he needs another bailout. In case you haven't realised it yet, the USA government is BANKRUPT and they know from the IRS that there's around $5 trillion in US individual retirement accounts. Yummy! Free money for more spending. Only idiots would put their money with US treasury bonds. Rather buy gold or silver with it and put it under your bed, because by the time you retire the dollar will be worthless at the rate they're currently manipulating the currency.

The other ponzi scheme "retirement savings" account is Social Security, which will collapse in the near future. When Social Security was first introduced there were 60 workers per retiree, so it sounded good. Today that number is down to 3 to 1. No matter how you spin it, the numbers don't work and there are more people collecting money from SS than are paying into the fund. On top of that the government has stolen money from SS over the years to pay for other election promises and free stuff. Sure, they put an IOU into the SS drawer with every withdrawal, but what's the chances that a bankrupt government will ever repay those trillions they owe? ZERO.

Now, if Obama was really concerned about the retirement of the "folks", then he would privatise the SS fund. Workers are currently paying in 6.2% every paycheck into SS, with their employer matching with another 6.2%. Effectively, employees are putting in the full 12.4%. If they were to put that money every pay-check into a tax-free retirement account (like this one) they would retire as multi-millionaires if they started the account at 21 years of age.

But the US government doesn't want that, because they wouldn't be able to get their grubby little paws on the money whenever they felt like it. It would also make people less beholden to the government i.e. the government wouldn't be able to control their lives as much.

For years now the Republican Party has been calling for SS reform to save the fund, and every time they do, the Democrats jump up and down scaring people by saying that grandma's gonna have to eat dog food. They don't want the Republicans to be successful in reforming SS, because if they were successful, then the Democrats would lose millions of voters as more and more people retire as millionaires and realise the Democrats are idiots. Much easier to blame the demise of SS on the Republicans instead, even though it's a lie.  

See how this works? They impoverish YOU for political gain. To keep you their slaves.

At the end of the day, it's pretty easy to help Americans save for their retirement - if there was a genuine will. Putting your money into government bonds isn't the way to go.

Many people have been warning that the US government would take people's retirement money. This is the beginning of the "conversation". 

Wait until it become mandatory - just like Obamacare.

Below is a good article, explaining what Obama is doing. Have a read.




I have an old acquaintance named Sam who has a hell of a deal for you.

Sam is actually a pretty famous guy with a big reputation. Unfortunately he has been a bit down and out on his luck lately… but he’s trying to make a comeback. And Sam is prepared to float you a really great investment opportunity.

Here’s the deal he’s offering: you give Sam your hard-earned retirement savings. Sam will invest your funds, and pay you a rate of return.

Granted, the rate of return he’s promising doesn’t quite keep up with inflation. So you will be losing some money. But don’t dwell on that too much.

And, rather than invest your funds in productive assets, Sam is going to blow it all on new cars and flat screen TVs. So when it comes time to make interest payments, Sam won’t have any money left.

But don’t worry, he still has that good ole’ credibility. So even though his financial situation gets worse by the year, Sam will just go back out there and borrow more money from other people to pay you back.

Of course, he will be able to keep doing this forever without any consequences whatsoever.

I know what you’re thinking– “where do I sign??” I know, right? It’s the deal of the lifetime.

This is basically the offer that the President of the United States floated last night.

And like an unctuously overgeled used car salesman, he actually pitched Americans on loaning their retirement savings to the US government with a straight face, guaranteeing “a decent return with no risk of losing what you put in. . .”

This is his new “MyRA” program. And the aim is simple– dupe unwitting Americans to plow their retirement savings into the US government’s shrinking coffers.

We’ve been talking about this for years. I have personally written since 2009 that the US government would one day push US citizens into the ‘safety and security’ of US Treasuries.

Back in 2009, almost everyone else thought I was nuts for even suggesting something so sacrilegious about the US government and financial system.

But the day has arrived. And POTUS stated almost VERBATIM what I have been writing for years.

The government is flat broke. Even by their own assessment, the US government’s “net worth” is NEGATIVE 16 trillion. That’s as of the end of 2012 (the 2013 numbers aren’t out yet). But the trend is actually worsening.

In 2009, the government’s net worth was negative $11.45 trillion. By 2010, it had dropped to minus $13.47 trillion. By 2011, minus $14.78 trillion. And by 2012, minus $16.1 trillion.

Here’s the thing: according to the IRS, there is well over $5 trillion in US individual retirement accounts. For a government as bankrupt as Uncle Sam is, $5 trillion is irresistible.

They need that money. They need YOUR money. And this MyRA program is the critical first step to corralling your hard earned retirement funds.

At our event here in Chile last year, Jim Rogers nailed this right on the head when he and Ron Paul told our audience that the government would try to take your retirement funds:





I don’t know how much more clear I can be: this is happening. This is exactly what bankrupt governments do. And it’s time to give serious, serious consideration to shipping your retirement funds overseas before they take yours.

Source

Obama: I will use Executive Orders to bypass Congress

I believe many Democrat members of Congress applauded enthusiastically when Obama said that he would do whatever he can without legislation this year - in other words, using Executive Orders to bypass Congress.

From his State of the Union speech yesterday:
President Obama says this is a “year of action”—and last night he made it very clear whose action he was talking about.
After noting recently that he has a pen and a phone and can use those to make changes without the help of Congress, Obama charged forward with promises of taking executive action wherever lawmakers fail to meet his demands.
Well then, all those who applauded need to pack up and go home because Obama has just made their jobs redundant! Should save the country millions in salaries for them and their staff.

How stupid can you be? Applauding your own irrelevance........






South Africa: Economists warn of SA recession

Yesterday the South African Reserve Bank (Sarb) hiked its key lending rate by 50 basis points to 5.5%.

This will add to the economic woes of working South Africans. The Rand is depreciating against the US dollar at an alarming rate, raising the prices of everything in the country - now this. Add the unofficial unemployment rate of 45%, all the strikes hitting the mining sector and rampant corruption within the government and South Africa is heading for an economic slowdown - as sure as night follows day.

South Africa's debt at the moment stands at R1 794 160 000 000.00 and rising. Yes, that's nearly 2 trillion rand. How is the country ever going to repay this debt?? 

Add to that the debt announced yesterday by the national carrier South African Airways (SAA) which has just reported a loss of R990m for the 2012/13 financial year. South African tax payers will once again bail out SAA, whether they like it or not. SAA seems to have no plans to curb their expenses, seeing as they once again employed MORE people instead of getting rid of staff:
The airline keeps employing people, and Minister of Public Enterprises Malusi Gigaba has made it clear that no one will be fired. 
The problem then is why are more and more people being hired? 
Headcount in the 2013 year reflects a 4% increase in staff numbers to 11 500 people. 
This resulted in employee costs rising by 3% to R4.8bn from R4.7bn.

In 2008 SAA staff numbers were reduced to 8000. Now it's back up to 11 500. Yup, nincompoops are running the company, with more nincompoops in government allowing them to get away with it.

So, just how bad has the ANC been for South Africa? Look at the chart below to see how a bunch of uneducated liberation fighters have run the economy since 1994 - and there's your answer. 



JOHANNESBURG – The South African Reserve Bank (Sarb) risks sending the country’s economy back into recession if it chooses to raise interest rates, economists said on Tuesday.

Governor Gill Marcus is expected to announce the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC)’s decision on Wednesday afternoon.

It is widely expected the central bank will keep rates at lows of five percent where it has been since July 2012.

But with ongoing industrial action, low growth and inflation edging upwards, economists say a hike might become necessary.

At the same time, other major emerging markets face similar concerns and are leaning towards raising rates.

The rand is also facing further drops against the dollar as the US Federal Reserve is expected to continue tapering its stimulus programme while the American economy sees slow improvements.

Read more here

Good point.....







Caption this....

(Here's the history)







29 January 2014

For the discerning hound








Some free advice....







San Francisco??







South Africa: Area for a possible White homeland

Below is a map floating around on the internet. It shows an area for a White homeland in South Africa - similar to Lesotho and Swaziland.

What are your thoughts?

My initial thought was that it's in the warmest, driest area of South Africa. But then I thought about it and realised that it has to be an area which the Blacks don't have a historical right to, and also an area they don't want or see as a threat to the rest of the country. 

We all know that within a few decades of Whites living in the homeland, it would be transformed into an oasis. Like Israel has done in the Middle-East. 

So, the challenge would be to ensure that none of the other races get access to the area - EVER. Where Whites live the others follow because they can't create wealth or jobs on their own. So protecting the borders would need to be number 1! That would be my one negative on this area. The borders are going to be hard to protect.

If a homeland doesn't work out then to survive, South African White's are going to have to start congregating into one area of the country and become self-sustainable. They are going to have to look after each other - build White-only communities. Take in all the indigent Whites living in squatter camps around the country and help them rise up again. Educate the kids themselves. 

Have a look at the Afrikaner-only town of Orania and how it's growing by the day. They are currently building their first shopping mall and golf club. Whites live and work there - no outside help allowed. It's all done by Whites, for Whites. Click on this LINK to see photos of the development going on there and tell me it can't be done.

Let me know your thoughts on the proposed area. 




South Africa: DA-Agang: Dial M for Merger

Rumours are rife that the DA's Aunty Zille and Agang leader Mamphela Ramphele are going to merge their political parties for the upcoming election, with Ramphele getting the nod for president....

Who cares??

Seriously. 

The DA (Democratic Alliance) are ANTI-WHITE so if you vote for them then good luck with that. 

Agang's Ramphele throws a few bones to Whites every now and then. She once said that education was better under Apartheid and the Whites immediately bowed down before here and called for her to be president - that's how desperate they've become. However, you know that if she were ever president then her Bantu nature would take over and she'd throw the Whites under the bus first chance she got. 

And Whites should know by now that Botox Zille identifies more with her Xhosa pals in Khayelitsha than her fellow Whites. Who do you think she'd sell down the river first were she in power? Her party already trashes Whites - never standing up for them - so what's the chance she'd stand up for the Whites if she were in power?? The DA USES Whites for their vote and they stupidly give it to them believing it's their only choice. 

But White's must vote, because for every White person who doesn't vote, it's another vote for the ANC. In that case rather give your vote to the FF+. At least you know they are looking out for the Whites.


Hat tip: South African N






Depending on which political analyst you listen to over the next few days, you’ll be told that the news that Agang leader Mamphela Ramphele will be the DA’s presidential candidate in this year’s elections is either a total gamechanger, or no gamechanger at all. The truth is that nobody can possibly know with any degree of certainty what impact the DA-Agang deal will have until the votes are counted. One thing that is clear, though, is that the move will have surprised nobody very much – unless, of course, you’re a grassroots Agang member. 





Read more here


USA: Obama delivers his State of the Union speech

This was his speech:

I..............me...............my.........................global warming is real............................blah blah blah ................... me....................... my......................I..............executive orders..................blah blah blah..........................forward.............................direct action....................me....................I..................cheers.

See, I didn't even have to watch it to know what he blah blahed about. 

In the meantime he continues to use any bleeding heart cause to push his agenda. And the fools in America can't see what he's doing. What a false prophet he is.

When Obama speaks, just flip everything he says 180 degrees to get the truth.