Well, that's what the University of Wisconsin is going to be shoving down their student's throats.
Apparently students are going to be taught that systems and institutions are set up for Whites and as such are “unfair".
So much for building people up - much easier to tear them down - especially White people - and justify it somehow, eh Liberals?
It's also apparently difficult to see racism when you're White.........but, let's turn that statement around and say that it's hard to see anything BUT racism if you're Black or a non-White Hispanic. That statement isn't so PC now, eh self-loathing Liberals?
But, White tax money is just fine to pay for all the entitlements that Blacks receive, no?
Whites are okay to build up a nation into one of the greatest, and then destroy itself by pandering to these same Black people who have proven that they are still to drag themselves up to White levels - either because they aren't able to, or they're too lazy to.
How many trillions have been spent trying to uplift and educate these eternally ungrateful people? How many trillions have been paid in guilt money to make these Black people shut up and stop their whining and do their part for the country? And it's STILL not enough to appease them. No, Liberals are never satisfied with their work.
No, they still have to destroy and demoralise the American White population a bit more. They're not happy with the pace of destruction, and what better place to further destroy White culture than at universities, colleges and schools where the young malleable minds are on a platter to be indoctrinated? Where these White students are too scared to deviate from what they're taught by unionised teachers and lecturer's?
You know, the world is still going to look at the Apartheid model and think, why didn't we think of that? Look at all the trouble we sit with trying to force all the different races and cultures into one big family. It CLEARLY doesn't work. Whites are hen-pecked by their own and other disgruntled races into feeling that they're not worthy of anything - they are to be ashamed of not only their race, but their accomplishments over the centuries. All so that those races which are INFERIOR and have never amounted to much can feel better and not like victims anymore. So much easier to bring down Whites than force non-Whites up.
Well, here's my lily-White ass - you may kiss it anyway you see fit.
The University of Wisconsin – Superior (UWS) is sponsoring a campaign that teaches students it is “unfair” to be white, a university spokesperson confirmed to Campus Reform last Wednesday.
The controversial project, named the “Unfair Campaign,” exists to teach students that “systems and institutions are set up for us [whites]” and as such are “unfair.” The campaign’s slogan, as it appears on its official website, is “it’s hard to see racism when you’re White.”
The project disseminates its controversial message through an aggressive campaign of online videos, billboards, and lectures.
Posters produced by the group feature a number of Caucasians with slogans like “is white skin really a fair skin?” sharpied on their faces.
The campaign was initially sponsored by the University of Minnesota – Duluth (UMD), but the school dropped their partnership and labeled the campaign “divisive” and “alienating” after a Campus Reform investigation brought unwanted national attention to the school.
Lynn Williams, a spokeswoman for UWS, told Campus on Wednesday UWS does not “exactly” share UMD’s concerns.
The school is using the campaign as an “opportunity on our campus to talk about all privilege and to create conversation,” she told Campus Reform.
“We really felt that this was an opportunity for the campus and the neighboring community to learn and to grow together,” Williams added.
Williams added UWS has held a number of “diversity dialogues” in conjunction with the Unfair Campaign and said that a number of professors have discussed the project in their classrooms.
The university has several events planned for the future and is not considering dropping its sponsorship, she added.
Source
In their own twisted way they are saying white is better. Just like affirmative action... you aren't good enough without our help.
ReplyDeleteYeah it's our white skin that keeps black back. Nothing to do with their IQ...
ReplyDeleteI personally like white people........
ReplyDeleteso......in other words the very people purporting this have to be racist themselves...how else would they back up their statement without taking the higher moral ground?...
ReplyDeleteso, this proves that whites ARE better and liberals ARE still mentally diseased...thanks for stating the obvious libtards!
Liberals are the most anti-White racist group because they see White racism everywhere. And it's contagious - they've passed it down to Blacks and Hispanics so that they now also see White racism everywhere. Funny how that works.
DeleteInteresting. I wonder how they square that campaign with Ron Unz article which shows whites are actually discriminated against in admissions?
ReplyDelete"“Based on reported statistics, Jews approximately match or even outnumber non-Jewish whites at Harvard and most of the other Ivy League schools, which seems wildly disproportionate. Indeed, the official statistics indicate that non-Jewish whites at Harvard are America’s most under-represented population group, enrolled at a much lower fraction of their national population [18%] than blacks or Hispanics, despite having far higher academic test scores...
As a consequence, Asians appear under-represented relative to Jews by a factor of seven, while non-Jewish whites are by far the most under-represented group of all, despite any benefits they might receive from athletic, legacy, or geographical distribution factors."
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/the-myth-of-american-meritocracy/
No, no, no - Whites are NEVER discriminated against! Get with the program. Anything happening to Whites is just pay-back for everything they've done since year dot. We deserve what's happening to us.
DeleteI wonder if McDonald is correct that Europeans are particularly vulnerable to this kind of brain washing.
ReplyDelete"Recent research by evolutionary economists provides fascinating insight on the differences between individualistic cultures versus collectivist cultures. An important aspect of this research is to model the evolution of cooperation among individualistic peoples. Fehr and Gächter (2002) found that people will altruistically punish defectors in a 'one-shot' game -- a game in which participants only interact once and are thus not influenced by the reputations of the people with whom they are interacting. This situation therefore models an individualistic culture because participants are strangers with no kinship ties. The surprising finding was that subjects who made high levels of public goods donations tended to punish people who did not even though they did not receive any benefit from doing so. Moreover, the punished individuals changed their ways and donated more in future games even though they knew that the participants in later rounds were not the same as in previous rounds. and Gächter suggest that people from individualistic cultures have an evolved negative emotional reaction to free riding that results in their punishing such people even at a cost to themselves -- hence the term 'altruistic punishment.'...
This suggests the fascinating possibility that the key for a group intending to turn Europeans against themselves is to trigger their strong tendency toward altruistic punishment by convincing them of the evil of their own people. Because Europeans are individualists at heart, they readily rise up in moral anger against their own people once they are seen as free riders and therefore morally blameworthy -- a manifestation of their much stronger tendency toward altruistic punishment deriving from their evolutionary past as hunter gatherers. In making judgments of altruistic punishment, relative genetic distance is irrelevant. Free-riders are seen as strangers in a market situation; i.e., they have no familial or tribal connection with the altruistic punisher.
Thus the current altruistic punishment so characteristic of contemporary Western civilization: Once Europeans were convinced that their own people were morally bankrupt, any and all means of punishment should be used against their own people. Rather than see other Europeans as part of an encompassing ethnic and tribal community, fellow Europeans were seen as morally blameworthy and the appropriate target of altruistic punishment. For Westerners, morality is individualistic -- violations of communal norms by free-riders are punished by altruistic aggression."
http://www.csulb.edu/~kmacd/books-Preface.html
Interesting. Or, it could also be due to brainwashing and post WWII guilt and stupidity.
DeleteDNA does predispose one to certain behaviours, but being sentient, one can overule the DNA's demands
ReplyDeleteJust as black dysfunction has its origins in DNN so too does whites inability to stand together stem from DNA origins.
No one is a slave to DNA in terms of behaviour, one chooses.
And just as blacks choose their dysfunction, whites choose their non group mentality.
As the article by Fehr and Gächter. Shows, I've had that thinking myself for a long time.
Maybe humans are slaves to what their dna dictates them to be.
Well, they have to find SOME reason to blow research money, and if it's on why whites are self-imploding, then so be it.....maybe it's the stupidity gene?
DeleteLime Lite, If you don't mind, I'd like to borrow your words in saying to these campaigners: "Well, here's my lily-white ass - (too) you may kiss it anyway you see fit."
ReplyDelete