30 August 2012

The American Right Asks the Left for a Divorce

Ever wanted to divorce the Liberals and Lefty Socialists and let them live in their own country? Well, below is a letter of divorce....one can only dream.

Dear American liberals, leftists, statists, social progressives, socialists, Marxists and Obama supporters, etc:

We have stuck together since the late 1950′s for the sake of the kids, but this latest election has made me realize that we should get a divorce. I know we tolerated each other for many years for the sake of future generations, but sadly, this relationship has clearly run its course.

Our two ideological sides of America cannot and will not ever agree on what is right for us all, so let’s just end it on friendly terms. We can smile and chalk it up to irreconcilable differences and go our own way.

Here is a model separation agreement:
–Our two groups can equitably divide up the country by landmass each taking an appropriate portion. We’re happy to give you New England and the West Coast. The good people of New Hampshire obviously will need some time to pack up and move to flyover country, and we’ll give the tenured professors in university towns ample time to relocate in your share of the country.
–We don’t like redistributive taxes and the IRS, so you can keep them.
–You are welcome to the left-wing judges and the ACLU.
–Since you hate guns and war, we’ll take our firearms, the cops, the NRA and the military.
–We’ll take the nasty, smelly oil industry and you can go with wind, solar and biodiesel.
–You can keep Oprah, Michael Moore and Rosie O’Donnell. You are, however, responsible for finding a bio-diesel vehicle big enough to move all three of them.
–We’ll keep capitalism, greedy corporations, pharmaceutical companies, Wal-Mart and Wall Street.
–You can have your beloved welfare grubbers, food stamp recipients, homeless, hippies, druggies, and illegal aliens.
–We’ll keep the hot Alaskan hockey moms, greedy CEO’s, and rednecks.
–We’ll keep the Bibles and give you the networks and Hollywood.
–You can make nice with Iran and Palestine and we’ll retain the right to invade and hammer places that threaten us.
–You can have the peaceniks and war protesters. When our allies or our way of life are under assault, we’ll help provide them security.
–We’ll keep our Judeo-Christian values.
–You are welcome to Islam, Scientology, Humanism, political correctness and Shirley McClaine. You can also have the U.N. but we will no longer be paying the bill.
–We’ll keep the SUV’s, pickup trucks, and full-sized luxury cars. You can take every Subaru, Volvo, and Prius you can find.
–You can give everyone healthcare if you can find any practicing doctors.
–We’ll continue to believe healthcare is a product of the marketplace and not a right.
–We’ll keep “The Battle Hymn of the Republic” and “The National Anthem.”
–I’m sure you’ll be happy to substitute “Imagine”, “I’d Like to Teach the World to Sing”, “Kum Ba Ya” or “We Are the World”.
–We’ll practice trickle down economics and you can continue to give trickle up poverty your best shot.
–Since it often so offends you, we’ll keep our history, our name and our flag.

Would you agree to this? If so, please pass it along to other like-minded liberals. In the spirit of friendly parting, I’ll bet you $10 (our new gold-backed dollar, not your QE15 dollar) which one of us will need help in 15 years.

American libertarians, conservatives, traditionalists, constitutionalists, etc

P.S. Also, please take Ted Turner, Sean Penn, Martin Sheen, Barbara Streisand, &; Jane Fonda with you.

P.P.S. And you won’t have to press 1 for English when you call our country.

Rich Statists Exposed as Complete Hypocrites

Obama has been calling on the wealthy in America to 'pay their fair share'. So, what happens when a commentator corners some of the Democratic one percenters who are arguing in favor of the rich paying more? Watch and laugh as they squirm...ah you gotta love the collectivist liberal - too scared to do anything on their own (including thinking) unless everyone else is holding their hand.

Tennessee USA: Three men who have fathered 78 children with 46 different women

In the PC world, we would all be made to feel sorry for the baby-mama's of all these children. How could these men do this to them! In the real world, these women knew exactly what they were doing - they were producing their next government pay check. You see, in America if a parent doesn't pay child support the state ends up paying it for them. Say the government pays $500 per month per child, that means they are paying nearly $40,000 per month for these kids. That's YOUR money going to support kids you don't even know. Times that by the millions out there who are supported by the tax payers.  That's how America has gotten itself into $16 trillion debt - by being kind-hearted to those who don't deserve it. This abuse didn't happen when there was no welfare. But, along came the bleeding heart liberals and started their war on women - the real war, where women-rights were pushed and they were told it was okay to have kids at anytime - it was their right to decide. At the same time government kicked in their bit and said that they would financially support single moms who couldn't support themselves. The result? Over 75% of African-American kids today grow up not knowing who their father is. This liberal paternalistic view has produced the desired results - entire generations of problematic children who grow up to be unleashed on society. The jails bear the results. Studies have found that if you finish school, study further and wait to marry before having kids, you have a 2% chance of living in poverty. Not to do those 3 things in that order makes you 38 times more prone to living and raising your kids in poverty. Some inconvenient truths for the Left, which they chose to ignore. It doesn't quite fit their Utopian society where everyone has plenty, lives long and is prosperous...and hold hands whilst singing Kumbuya and watching the fairies fly past.  

Mr 30-Children Hatchett

Mr 23-Children Turnage
Camera shy: Richard A. Colbert, who would not allow his picture to be taken, said he does not have to pay for his 25 children by 18 different women as they are all adults
Mr 25-Children Colbert

Shock: Latoya Shields said her knees buckled when a prosecutor told her Turnage had 20 children before hers
One of the baby-mama's, Latoya Shields says she was 'shocked' to hear of the other 20 children - yeah right

Three men in Tennessee have notched up a staggering 78 children by 46 different women between them - and are doing their best to squirm out of paying for a single one.

Terry Turnage has 23 children with 17 different women, while Richard M. Colbert has 25 children with 18 women. But Desmond Hatchett takes the record with 30 children with 11 women.

On rare occasions, they pay a few dollars to the long-suffering mothers but mostly leave the state to pick up the slack - while one eludes his responsibilities altogether thanks to a stint in prison.

The latest deadbeat dad to emerge from the state is Turnage, who was summoned before a judge over child support payments for his 23 kids by 17 different women - but didn't show up to court.

One of the mothers, who had spent nearly eight years with Turnage, said her knees buckled when a prosecutor told her that the father of her child had 20 other children.

'During the whole relationship, I only knew of four children,' Latoya Shields told WREG. 'At that time, three years ago, my child was the 21st child. Yeah, that would be overwhelming for anybody.'

Last month, Turnage filed a petition at Shelby County Juvenile Court to lower his child support payments for the mothers of his children - but never turned up to the hearing.

Shields said the virile dad has shown little interest in his daughter. 'She calls him and it's a "hi" and "bye, see you later" type of situation,' she said.

She added that he hardly ever pays child support, but when he has, the checks have been between $6 and $9 - as he is likely splitting his earnings between all 17 women.

The meager sums come despite the court ordering Turnage to pay Shields $259 a month for their child - but she said she does not expect to see that sort of money.

The most prolific dad is 33-year-old Desmond Hatchett, of Knoxville, who has 30 children by at least 11 different women. Last month, he asked for the courts to give him a break from paying for them.

It is little surprise the virile dad is unable to pay up: he has been in and out of prison for the past three years - during which time he has somehow reportedly fathered another nine children.

He was sentenced to six years in prison for aggravated assault, but most of the term was suspended for 'enhanced probation' - which he promptly violated by getting arrested for domestic violence.

Hatchett now remains behind bars in the Morgan County Correctional Complex, and has lost two parole bids, according to The Smoking Gun.

When Hatchett was earning a minimum wage salary, legally half of his paycheck was seized by the state every month to pay for his scores of offspring, who are all under 14 years old.

Depending on the ages and needs of the children, he should have been paying anywhere between $25 and $309 to the mothers of his children.

But in reality, his paycheck only allowed a paltry $1.49 per child.

He told Fox2Now.com where it all went wrong: 'I had four kids in the same year. Twice.'

But he said he does manage to remember all their names, ages and birth dates.

Hatchett first appeared in court on missing child support charges in 2009, when he had 21 children. He said he would not father any more - but has had nine more in the past three years.

'I didn't intend to have this many, it just happened,' he said.

In his latest court appearance last month, 11 women were seeking child support payments from the man, who has set a Knox County record for his ability to reproduce.

Following in close pursuit is Richard M. Colbert, who has 25 children by 18 different women. But Colbert claims he doesn't have to pay for a single one - as they are all adults.

And he added, he feels lucky. 'Everybody's not able to have children,' he told Action News 5.

Another man in the state said he bears the brunt of Colbert's poor choice. The unfortunately named Richard A. Colbert is inundated with calls from women and children demanding child support.

'I'm constantly receiving phone calls from people who know this man. They are trying to get in contact with him,' Richard A. Colbert said.

Attorney Warren Campbell told Action News 5 if a person does not pay child support, the state ends up paying and there is no legal way to stop people from having children.


Dennis Miller unloads a few rounds of truth on Jay Leno

This is a classic example of how 'entertainers' like Jay Leno carry water for Obama and promote him through their programs. Watch the clip below and how Leno keeps trying to paint Republicans as uncompassionate women-haters. Luckily Dennis Miller was his guest and  put Leno straight on a few of his fluffs. Best line of the night: "I want to help the helpless. I don't CARE about the clueless!" 

29 August 2012

Obama's real legacy - $10 trillion in new federal debt over just four years

Hey,  nothing to complain about here! American wanted hopey-changy and boy did they get it. They have got the Change they were looking for - $10 trillion change. And now they get to Hope it's all a bad dream. Obama must be laughing his head off at the American voters. Here he was, an inexperienced Senator from Chicagee who had never held a real job before getting into politics, and then getting voted in as President of the USA....simply because he sounded intelligent....for a Black man. Oh how the people fell over themselves to vote this man in. No one knew much about him, apart from him being raised by communists and listening to the anti-American, anti-White radical Reverend Wright for 20 years. That should have sounded the warning bells, but oh no, Americans were ready for change! Change from listening to boring old White men to listening to an exciting smooth-talking half-n-half negro man. So what exactly has Obama achieved since coming into office apart from not signing off on a budget; increasing the size of government; trashing the Constitution; increasing the unemployment numbers; weakening America internationally; increasing poverty; putting more people on food stamps, welfare and disability; stopping America from becoming energy independent; socialising medical care through Obamacare; filling his government with radicals and Muslim sympathisers; increasing the debt; decreasing the value of the dollar; breaking down race relations; pandering to the illegal immigrants, and so on? Seems he's achieved quite a bit...if you're a Liberal. The only truly good thing that's happened on his watch has been the killing of Osama bin Laden, which he's taken full ownership of, even though he had nothing to do with the assassination. I feel for Americans, I really do, as there are many good folk who don't deserve what's happening to their country. Things happen for a reason, and hopefully America comes out at the other end a lot stronger and a lot smarter than four years ago. And let's all hope that Mr Hopey-Changy gets sent back to Chicago in November. Maybe he can help solve that city's dire financial mess just as he's managed to solve America's!

As Election Day nears, Americans certainly have some sobering choices to make. Whoever wins the White House has a monumental fiscal crisis to deal with - one that makes losses incurred during the Great Recession of 2008 look like pocket change.

Either way you cut it, the country has been, and will remain, on a path of unsustainable debt. Federal spending under George W. Bush added some $4 trillion dollars to the country's already burgeoning national debt, but under President Obama that debt has skyrocketed to a staggering $16-plus trillion, and, if the current administration's budget projections remain unchanged, Obama will have added an unprecedented, mind-numbing, calculator-busting $10 trillion in federal government debt that your children - and their children and their children - will likely have to pay off.

It's stunning, really, to sit back and watch the country being spent into oblivion, but that's what's happening.

Modest growth + increased debt = insolvency; the question is when

"By the end of this year, the federal debt is expected to be $16.2 trillion, which is $6.2 trillion more than when President Obama first came into office four years ago," says The Weekly Standard, a conservative publication, in a recent blog which included a graphic projecting record budget growth between now and Fiscal Year 2017, the end of a second Obama term if reelected.

Starting at an estimated $15.2 trillion of debt currently (which is about $5 trillion more than when Bush left office), federal debt is expected to rise to $17.5 trillion by next year, then rise by roughly a trillion dollars a year until 2016, when the federal debt is expected to exceed $20.3 trillion.

This isn't hyperbole; under the current regime, the country has suffered through four straight years of trillion-dollar deficits, and there is no reason to expect, given its history, that the current administration would change much.

"The Congressional Budget Office also says it expects the economy to continue recovering at only a modest rate the rest of this year, growing at a modest annual rate of 2.25 percent. The slow-moving economy and massive federal deficits are top-flight issues in this year's presidential and congressional campaigns," The Associated Press said in parsing a CBO estimate on current budget projections.

"Federal debt will increase to $25.4 trillion by the end of 2022, an increase of $10.6 trillion (72 percent) under the president's budget policies," adds the Senate Budget Committee.

Budget? What budget?

Part of the problem is unrestrained spending. As in, Congress has not voted on, and Obama has not signed, an actual budget in more than three years. According to the Standard, it's been more than 1,212 days since Senate Democrats allowed a budget vote on the floor of their chamber.

"Article I of the U.S. Constitution requires Congress to pass a federal budget. Despite the clear priority the Constitution gives to maintaining discipline in federal spending, the last time Congress enacted a budget was April 29, 2009," more than three years ago, noted Mathew Staver, chairman of the Liberty Council.

Here are some more staggering numbers:

-- Under current figures, the U.S. debt-per-person exceeds $50,900; U.S. debt per taxpayer; however, climbs to a staggering $140,000 each

-- The current national debt is slated to surpass $16 trillion before Election Day

-- The country's Social Security liability is in excess of $15 trillion; the prescription drug liability is more than $20 trillion, and Medicare's unfunded liability is $83 trillion, for a total unfunded liability of a massive, country-shattering $120.4 trillion - or every dollar in gross domestic product the U.S. will generate for the next eight years. And in case you're interested, that's a total debt of more than $1 million per taxpayer.

As Americans, we have some very important fiscal decisions to make when we go to the polls in November.


Hunger worsening in Zimbabwe - UN

Shock, horror! Zimbabwe is running low on food supplies and the people are going hungry. No ways! This can't be right. Mugabe had a good plan which couldn't fail. He took the productive farms from the evil White people and handed them over to his cronies, war-veterans, suffering people so that they could get some of that White farmer action (just a pity they'd never farmed before and only knew how to trash the farms). And then they all lived happily ever after....... 

Oops, wrong ending. 

They all starved whilst Mugabe and his boys lived like kings and let the UN worry about resolving the problem he created. And the UN, good little lap-dogs of the dictators that they are, are front and centre begging the rest of the world to pony up the millions of dollars required to feed his people. They are out begging because world governments aren't falling over themselves to help old Mugarbage out. I wonder why. Could it be because he's made his own bed and now has to lie  in it? Or, because he has to swallow his own bitter medicine? What does need to happen is for the world to allow Zimbabwe to fail. Let the people get so angry and desperate that they have to do something about their own situation. No more Liberals interfering, trying to act like their Daddy. If Zimbabweans aren't allowed to feel the failure, then they will never learn. And Mugarbage will win the next election....once again.


Harare - The United Nations food agency says hunger is worsening in Zimbabwe after erratic rains, shortages of seeds and fertilizer and "poor agricultural practices" in the troubled economy led to a reduction in fields planted with the main staple foods.

The World Food Programme said cereal harvests in the current season were down by an estimated one third compared to last year.

About 1.1 million rural people will need food aid up to December, rising to 1.6 million in the traditionally "lean months" to March, it said.

The agency's latest bulletin on Tuesday said $119m is needed for upcoming food assistance but so far only $32m has been pledged by financial institutions and donors for food imports. 

WFP said food shortfalls are becoming especially critical in arid southern Zimbabwe.


South Africa: Judge takes pity on farmer’s killers

A judge in South Africa has decided that it's not really murder-murder if you kill your boss when you're unhappy with them. Judge Neil Tuchten has reduced the jail sentences of three farm workers who killed the farmer they worked for because....wait for it, you'll love it.......they killed him because he was unfair, cruel and mean to them, and not out of financial gain! Gee thanks judge - now anyone in the country who kills their boss because they were 'mean or cruel or unfair' need not worry about sitting and rotting in jail for their crime. No, they can appeal and get a lighter sentence because they killed for the right reasons. And not only that, but this stupid judge has taken the word of murdering criminals over the word of the DEAD farmer, who of course, couldn't defend himself because he is DEAD. And then you wonder why South Africa has a crime problem, when you have liberal bleeding heart judges like this dickhead Tuchten overriding the sentences of murderers so he can feel all warm and fuzzy inside - bugger the justice for the DEAD farmer. I mean, who cares about a farmer right, seeing as nearly 4000 have already been slaughtered in the country. Oh, and then to rub salt in the wounds, this pisshead judge has the audacity to say that it wasn't a farm murder, but a murder on a farm (which apparently is different to a farm murder). This wanker judge seems to be impressed by semantics and how intelligent it makes him look. Let's hope that pisshead Tuchten's decision doesn't come bite him in the posterior. Many of the thousands of criminals released by Zuma a few months ago are back in jail having recommitted crimes such as rape and murder. Let's hope judge Tuchten's family doesn't feel it when the wheel turns and karma comes a-knocking.

Pretoria - A North Gauteng High Court judge has reduced the sentences of three farmworkers who admitted to killing the farmer they had worked for - apparently because he was unfair, cruel and mean to them.

Judge Neil Tuchten reduced the sentences of Dumisani Zwane, who got 20 years, and Skhumbuza Ndaba and Mbongeni Ndaba, who had both received 25 years, to 12 and 15 years, reported The Pretoria News.

In his verdict Tuchten said the circuit court trial judge had placed too much emphasis on farm murders and said this was not a farm murder but “a murder on a farm”.

He said they had killed Gert Rabe on his farm in Wakkerstroom not for financial gain but out of anger and resentment for his behaviour towards his employees, who were apparently assaulted frequently and sexually humiliated.

The farmworkers had apparently at first tried to hide the murder but had later given themselves up at the police station and pleaded guilty to murder.


28 August 2012

Tale of a Zimbabwean farm

What do dogs and fences say about a farmer? Read the article to find out.....

Hat tip: Robin Hind

When I was a student at Gwebi Agricultural College in the early 60's we often visited farms to see firsthand what they were doing to improve production or manage harsh resources. We soon learned that you could tell what sort of farmer we were going to meet by two yardsticks - what was the condition of the farm fences and what sort of dogs greeted us at the homestead.

The first measure told us about the farmers technical and farming abilities in that we never found an outstanding farmer in any field who did not have neat, well maintained fences. Farmers with good human resource skills always had friendly dogs. Overall this really summed up the farmers abilities and potential for success.

Today, there is no more telling indicator of failure of agricultural policies and practices than our fences - there are none, and where they do exist they are untidy, ineffective and often in a state of collapse. They reveal many things - the absence of any real sense of ownership or pride, the lack of security, the absence of any idea of what fences mean in terms of management and control. Where those occupying the farms do erect fences they are seldom tidy or effective. That too says a great deal about the farmer.

Just what happens to the fences? Commercial farmers occupied about 10 million hectares of land in Zimbabwe in 2000, they had carefully fenced every farm - not just boundaries but also internal paddocks and lands. In many cases there were fences designed for game as well as cattle and small stock, fences two metres high, straining posts set in concrete and steel, gates and cattle grids. They are all gone, they vanish over time and you seldom see any sign of what they do with the wire and poles.

Friends of ours who farmed 25 000 hectares of semi arid land in region 5 or 6 in the south of the country are a useful example. He was once the top breeder of Brahman cattle in the country and ran the cattle in conjunction with wild life. He had fenced the property with two metre high game fence, cattle grids at the main crossing points and gates elsewhere, 8 boreholes and many kilometers of pipelines to feed water toughs. This is very dry country and the soils poor in most case. No surface water.

Sam had learned over the years that you had to rotate your cattle and he basically rotated the cattle so that at any one time he was able to rest half the farm in the wet season so that the grass could make maximum use of the rains when they fell. Over 100 years they maintained rainfall records and the average never varied significantly over 300 mls per annum. However in that period they had serious drought every 3 or 4 years - in some years no rain fell at all. In this hard, unforgiving climate, they made a living and when times were good were able to put in development. To do this eventually he had 3 800 kilometers of wire in his fences.

Under this management system the grass cover on the farm gradually improved, different species became established and the overall carrying capacity improved until he had an estimated 2200 wild animals on the property and slightly more cattle. Sam was Afrikaans in background but he and his wife chose to leave South Africa because of its racial policies and come to this country. Here he learned the local language, Venda, which he speaks fluently; he always tried to maintain good relations with the local community and the local chiefs.

They were invaded 8 years ago, the State moving people onto the property and providing them with food and other support. Today the property is semi desert, I doubt if you could find enough grass on the entire 25 000 hectares to fill a bag. The majority of the "settlers" have abandoned the property because it cannot support their livestock. The only borehole still working is at the homestead where Sam lives with his wife. There is not a metre of fencing left on the entire property. A handful of Zebra and Impala remain, the Eland are all gone along with the Giraffe and Wildebeest.

Last year he was forced to sell the last of his beloved Brahmans and they now have no cattle for the first time in their lives. 50 years of breeding and selection have been lost, genetics that will take many years to recover when and if production can be resumed.

But that is only the final effect of this tragic story, the reality for us as a country is the loss of investment, genetic capital, employment and income generation on a sustainable basis and now just another extension to what is rapidly becoming desert.

Many would argue that the desertification of these areas is due to "Global Warming" but of this there is no evidence at all. A careful study of the meticulous records on this farm over 100 years shows that there is no discernable change in rainfall - either in distribution or volume. The sole change in the past decade is the removal of ownership rights through a destructive and illegal land grab and the subsequent deliberate destruction of the management infrastructure essential to land management in this marginal rainfall area.

In every area of the world where land ownership is vested in community structures and not in individual title with long term security, land use and production is unsustainable and destructive. Communal agriculture is only sustainable at subsistence level in conditions where the availability of virgin land is open and unrestricted. As the land is exploited in these conditions its productive capacity declines and the people simply destroy their homes and move to new areas and start again. Over time the areas used recover and can eventually be reoccupied in 20 or 30 years time.

In semi arid areas, especially in the sensitive savannah bushveld of Africa, the most immediate impact of growing populations has been to replace nomadic land use patterns with fixed abode and this is invariably associated with land degradation and in extreme cases, desertification. When deserts form they are almost impossible to rehabilitate. That is why the Kalahari desert is growing at a kilometer a year, that is why the Savannah of the Sahael has disappeared and been replaced with desert sand dunes.

Africa cannot ignore this reality for much longer. As countries came to independence in the period after 1950, one by one they destroyed the systems of tenure that the colonial powers had brought to the continent. In their place they created systems that always left the ownership of land in State hands and usage rights subject to political patronage. The result is that the continent with more potentially productive land than any other is now the largest net importer of food in the world. The USA with its private farm industry and only 3 per cent of its population engaged in agriculture; produces half the surplus food production of the world. American farmers in the mid west are so important that the current drought there has doubled global grain prices in a matter of weeks.

The "land reform" process in Zimbabwe has been an unmitigated disaster. Despite the steady recovery in the wider economy since 2008, agriculture remains in steep decline. No greater symptom of failure exists than the disappearance of our fences. But behind that façade lies a deeper malaise - that of total insecurity. There can be no recovery in the farm industry until this is addressed - not just in commercial farming districts but also in communal areas where the absence of security for decades has resulted in conditions of absolute poverty, hunger and land degradation.


Analysis: Europe far right shuns Breivik's acts, flirts with ideas

Most sane people would agree that mass killer Anders Breivik is a few cans short of a six-pack. Yet, the Liberal media jumped all over his killing spree claiming he was inspired by an evil, right-wing extremist Islamophobic ideology. Nothing could be further from the truth, for if he were a right-wing extremist Islamophobe, why didn't he kill a single Muslim? Why kill mostly White teenagers? Ha, but you see, that doesn't fit into what these Liberal idiots needed the narrative to be on these killings. No, they had to control what people were thinking and what better way to control them than to use these tragic deaths to put fear into the citizens of Norway (and Europe). And what better way to do that than to finger the evil extremist right-wingers in Europe as the guilty party in this entire charade. No matter the facts of the case, they were intent on using the events to punish their ideological opponents - anyone who is against their multi-cultural utopian dream. It doesn't matter that in Sweden and Denmark, most of the rapes and murders are being committed by Muslims. No, that's not talked or written about, and anyone reporting this is immediately labelled as extreme far-right xenophobic racist Islamophobes. So Breivik didn't stand a chance - not that he deserved one. No, the media and their pushers wanted one outcome, and they got it. They even went so far as to conduct an extremely aggressive campaign to rubbish the court-appointed psychiatrist's first assessment - that Breivik was criminally insane. The only report the judge accepted was the other one which said what they needed it to say - that he was sane to stand trial. And then at the end of the trial, even the female head judge Wenche Elizabeth Arntzen and her co-judges parroted exactly what the media had been reporting for the last year - that Breivik was part of a dangerous and delusional Internet-based “right-wing extremist” subgroup and that his massacre on July 22, 2011 was basically the logical conclusion of reading Islamophobic blogs. Even though there was never any proof of this during his trial. No, that didn't matter. And it also didn't matter that it was all in poor old Anders' head....all along. The truth is that he's just plain crazy. And as a result, many articles are being written by the press trying to continue this tired old line. In the article below, even though the authors admit that Breivik's outlook appeared to be a fantasy, they can't stop themselves from also saying that 'many of his beliefs are to be found within the fold of anti-Muslim, anti-immigrant populists'. See what' going on here? These liberals and their lapdog media as so scared that people are finally waking up to what the Left have done to their countries, that they'll use Breivik's insanity to stoke the belief that any day now, extreme right-wingers will let loose and kill people who aren't White. Just like Breivik didn't do! He chose to kill Whites. But, never let a bit of fear mongering get in the way of a good liberal tale. Even the Human Rights organisations are in on the con, calling for a European Spring, 'to overcome old and emerging forms of racism and intolerance' towards Muslims. Yes dear readers, only Whites can be intolerant and racist. Everyone else is their victim. Propaganda is a powerful tool used by Socialists and Communists and never have we seen a more perfect example than in the wake of the Breivik shootings. The Left rub their hands in glee knowing that they have people cowering in fear from those crazy nationalists who, at the end of the day, only want what's best for their countries. Muslims are being portrayed as innocent bystanders and perpetual victims, who only want a better life for their families; unfair targets of White 'prejudice'. The poor dears. Really, I almost have a tear in my eye. Yes people, be prepared to read many more such articles where you are made to feel guilty for being concerned about the increase in third-world immigration into your countries. Be prepared to read many more articles such as the one below where they use 'experts' to tell us how racist and extreme Whites are. Where they use unconfirmed 'facts' to make you believe that the Right are walking time-bombs, ready to attack anyone who isn't White. You will be battered from the Left side of politics as they attempt to shut you up for voicing your concerns. The only thing that will save you from these stupid useful idiots is to use your common sense and judge from whom the message is coming. And to be aware of the constant mind-games being played by the Left. They'll use anything to get their way, even when they know they're wrong. They have no morals you see.

Norwegian mass killer Anders Behring Breivik reacts as he returns after a break to the court room, in Oslo Courthouse August 24, 2012. REUTERS/Stoyan Nenov
Mass murderer Anders Breivik - the crazy one which the media decided wasn't crazy

Norwegian mass killer Anders Behring Breivik may have failed to ignite a race war with Muslims, but he succeeded in stoking anxieties about the stability of Europe's increasingly diverse societies.

Though his talk of an international underground of killers - latter-day Crusaders he called the Knights Templar - seemed to be mere fantasy, and while his methods place him far beyond the pale of mainstream politics, many of his beliefs are to be found within the fold of anti-Muslim, anti-immigrant populists.

"His ideological `manifesto' is a distilled representation of a cultural crisis that pervades the European continent and finds expression in an increasingly xenophobic populism," Kirsten Simonsen, a professor at Denmark's Roskilde University, wrote in "Bloodlands", a 2012 series of essays about Breivik.

Some notions - that Europe and its indigenous cultures are being weakened by immigration and multiculturalism - have been helping reshape the continent's right-wing politics for years.

These beliefs occasionally find an echo on the margins of centre-right parties, among politicians seeking support from communities plagued by rising unemployment.

Mario Borghezio is a case in point.

The Italian politician set off a storm of outrage after Breivik's gun and bomb massacre by declaring in a radio interview that its perpetrator had some "excellent" ideas.

Borghezio exemplifies a trend among populist anti-immigration groups - the use of the language of Western counter-terrorist efforts against al Qaeda to pursue what amounts to an anti-Islamic cultural campaign.


Human rights groups are increasingly alarmed, not just at the far right, but at what many see as the pandering to its Islamophobic stereotypes by Europe's mainstream parties.

"We need our own 'European Spring' to overcome old and emerging forms of racism and intolerance," Nils Muiznieks, the Commissioner for Human Rights at the Council of Europe, a governmental human rights body, wrote in a July 2012 blog.

Muslims, he said, had become the primary "other" in right-wing populist discourse in Europe, and needed to be accepted as an integral part of society, entitled to equality and dignity.

Political parties in Austria, Bulgaria, Belgium, Denmark, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway and Switzerland had employed anti-Muslim rhetoric for political gain, he said.

Borghezio's Breivik comment was denounced by his party, the pro-devolution, anti-immigrant Northern League, which apologized to Norway and temporarily suspended Borghezio from their ranks.

The European lawmaker argued the indignant reaction was misplaced, because he strongly condemned Breivik's violence.

And yet, a year on, he still sees Breivik's stance on some issues as attractive - particularly a perceived need to prevent Muslim immigration to Europe and combat Islamist extremism.

"Not all the ideas were criminal. It is the man who behaved in a criminal way," Borghezio told Reuters.


Tough regulation of immigrants, particularly Muslims, was essential, he said. In many mosques in Italy, he said, Muslims in economic difficulty were encouraged by extremist Islamist organizations "to carry out antisocial and illegal acts".

His comments echo the public position of many in Europe's far-right networks: a sense that the continent is under threat from Islamic extremists and is being betrayed by a rapacious political elite that values cheap Muslim labor above the economic welfare of its own communities.

Security specialists worry that far-right social media commentary stigmatizing Europe's Muslims may help push enthusiasts towards militancy, much as al Qaeda propaganda opened pathways to violence for numerous Islamist radicals.

In a 2012 report, European police agency Europol stated the threat of violent right-wing extremism "has reached new levels in Europe and should not be underestimated. The threat will most likely come from lone actors, but organized, underground groups also have the capability and intention to carry out attacks."

Some argue Breivik might have had more chance of setting off the kind of religious war he imagined if he had targeted Muslims, so as to create a cycle of revenge killings, rather than killing young white Norwegians from the pro-immigration Labour party, which encouraged a rallying behind common values.


On September 3, 2011, six weeks after Breivik's Utoeya massacre, Stephen Lennon, a leader of the rightist English Defence League, took to a podium in central London and warned against any repeat of the 2005 attacks by British Islamists on London's transport network that killed 52 people.

"The Islamic community will feel the full force of the English Defence League if we see any of our citizens killed, maimed or hurt on British soil ever again,' he said.

U.S.-based researcher Arun Kundnani, in a June 2012 paper for the Hague-based International Centre for Counter-Terrorism, asserts that in the past two decades rightist violence in Europe has been comparable to Islamist bloodshed.

By his count, since 1990, at least 249 people had died in incidents of far‐right violence in Europe, compared to 263 who have been killed by jihadist violence.

A 2012 report by a left-wing anti-racist group, Hope Not Hate, identified more than 100 groups it said were part of a so-called counter-jihadist movement promoting anti-Islamic agendas in Europe, the United States, Canada and Australia, sharing anti-Islamic commentaries, photos, videos and rock music.

The groups, some of which Breivik quotes from in his manifesto, replaced the old racial nationalist politics of neo-Nazis with the language of cultural wars, Hope Not Hate said.

Immigration is an obsession with such groups.

Fifteen to 20 million Muslims, out of a total population of 500 million, are estimated to live in the 27-member European Union as well as non-EU members Norway and Switzerland.

France, a nation of 60 million people, is home to Europe's largest Muslim minority, estimated at about 5 million. Norway estimates two percent of its 5 million population are Muslims.

A 2011 Pew survey of 50 European countries said the Muslim share of the population was expected to grow from six percent of the region's people in 2010 to eight in 2030, due in part to higher birth rates among Muslims than non-Muslims.


Breivik argued his 77 victims, mostly teenagers at the ruling Labour Party's summer camp on Utoeya, deserved to die because they supported Muslim immigration, which he said was adulterating pure Norwegian blood.

In Norway itself, Breivik's deeds rebounded against the right. The mainstream but anti-immigration Progress Party, briefly joined by Breivik, suffered a huge blow in municipal elections two months after the attack.

But a growing number of opinion surveys show Europeans increasingly receptive to the notion that immigration, especially by Muslims, should be curbed or halted.

A July 2011 Pew Attitudes survey found that, when asked whether Muslims wanted to adopt local customs or stay culturally distinct, majorities of European populations chose the latter answer. A Populus research service poll in 2011 of more than 5,000 people in Britain for the Left-wing Searchlight Educational Trust found deep resentment among a range of communities about immigration.


In June 2012 an Ipsos MORI poll on attitudes to immigration found that in seven out of nine EU member states surveyed the majority regarded immigration as having had a negative impact on their country: Sweden and Poland were the only exceptions.

Mainstream centre-political parties have tried to keep up with the trend, enacting a variety of measures in the social sphere that have sometimes inflamed tensions on the street.

France banned clothing that covers the face in April 2011 and Belgium followed suit in July of the same year, while similar legislation has been proposed in the Netherlands, Italy and some Spanish regions. Switzerland barred the construction of new minarets following a referendum in 2009.

There is a broad European shift away from overt skin-color racism to prejudices about culture and religion shaped in part by the West's war on al Qaeda.

"The whole focus of far right activity in Europe has shifted from race, the idea that ‘blacks are inferior', to wider issues of identity," said Ted Cantle, executive chairman of the Institute of Community Cohesion, a think tank.

Multiculturalism is another bugbear of the far right, which tends to define it as an excessive tolerance of immigrant communities that amounts to Western cultural suicide.

Centre-right politicians who have also questioned multiculturalism and advocated the primacy of Western liberalism in recent years include British Prime Minister David Cameron, German Chancellor Angela Merkel and former French President Nicolas Sarkozy. All did so facing domestic political pressure to take a tougher line on immigrants unwilling to adapt to host cultures.

Another example is Dutch populist Geert Wilders, head of the anti-immigration, anti-euro Freedom Party. Breivik's manifesto reproduced anti-Islamic comments Wilders made to the Dutch parliament. Wilders has denounced Breivik and his actions.

Pepe Egger, head of Western European Forecasting for the UK-based Exclusive Analysis research house, says some of Breivik's ideas are held quite widely among European political activists.

"The bizarre thing is that his ideas, as Islamophobic as they are, are almost mainstream in many European countries," he told Reuters. "The perceived need to defend Europe against 'Islamisation' is not that far removed from what you can find in the opinion pieces in large daily newspapers."


Obama Honors Armstrong.......By Posting a Picture of Himself On His Blog

One small step for man. One giant leap for the Narcissist-in-Chief.

Neil’s spirit of discovery lives on in all the men and women who have devoted their lives to exploring the unknown—including those who are ensuring that we reach higher and go further in space. That legacy will endure—sparked by a man who taught us the enormous power of one small step.
—President Obama on the passing of Neil Armstrong

We all know the world revolves around The Greatest President in the History of Everything. So it makes sense that all the other celestial bodies were placed in the sky to shine down upon him.
This is not a Photoshop. This was actually posted on Obama’s official Tumblr page:
Sure, Neil Armstrong walked on the moon. But only to tidy it up, so that one day it would be a suitable resting place for Obama’s kingly gaze.
Hat tip to Sooper Mexican, who notes that this is a stock image from last April. That’s how Team Obama thinks: “Hey, we got any pictures of the boss looking at the moon? Any way we can make this all about him?” And that attitude starts at the top. Just ask Queen Elizabeth, as she’s deleting all the Obama videos from the iPod he gave her…

So true....

Lawlessness on the rise in South Africa - ISS

Ah shame, poor George Bizos. It must be difficult to swallow that the paradise he has fought for so long is still a far way off. George Bizos is famous for being part of saint Nelson Mandela's legal defense team at his Rivonia Trial, where he was found guilty of treason and, instead of getting the death penalty as he richly deserved, was instead jailed for 27 years. Georgie-boy is said to have written Mandela's touching speech at the trial. Bizos is one of those dumb liberals who still believe in the tooth fairy and unicorns. He thinks if he protests enough then all will be right in the world. So, here he is, walking the streets once again in protest of the increased lawlessness in South Africa. Apparently he's shocked that even all he's done to wish it so, South Africa still isn't the paradise he envisioned it would one day be under the ANC. He's shocked that after the demise of Apartheid, South Africa is more violent than ever before. This is what happens when liberals and reality meet - they get a surprise! But, the poor imbecile uncle still doesn't get it. No, he thinks it's because of 'social inequalities' that violence is rampant. No Mr Bizos, try again - I'm sure if you think hard enough (and you are an extremely clever man seeing as you've defended the best communists out there) that you may just cotton onto the hard truth as to why South Africa is getting worse, not better. Social inequality is just the symptom not the disease. But hey, I don't blame you for using this red herring as your reason. It sure must be a hard pill to swallow and admit that your darling ANC terrorists - all of whom you've defended - have all contributed to the downfall of South Africa. It must be difficult to admit that the Boers had it right all those years ago when they saw very clearly that the Black South African is just not up to being civilised and dragged into the real world. Oh how you fought to show the world how racist these hard-working, industrious people were and that all it was, was pure racism on their part, making them adopt Apartheid from the British. When in reality - you know, that place you refuse to live in - it was just their nature, culture and DNA that stopped South African Blacks from achieving anything in life, and that it was up to the Whites to try and work around this huge handicap they lived with in Africa. Well, Mr Bizos can cry and weep as much as he likes because nothing is going to change the truth that he refuses to see. That old saying is very true:     
If you're young and not a liberal, you have no heart; if you're old and not a conservative, you have no brain. 
Except, I was never a liberal ever....only a realist, and Mr Bizos is still a stupid gullible Liberal. And they hate admitting their faults.

George Bizos and his good pal terrorist Mandela

Johannesburg - South Africa is in the grip of increasing lawlessness, according to a senior researcher at the Institute for Security Studies (ISS), Beeld reported on Monday.

According to an essay written by Johan Burger more than a week before the Marikana mine shootings, blame for anarchy cannot simply be attributed to contempt for the law or the absence of law enforcement, but should include the failure of government, and its absence.

"It looks like vigilante attacks are also on the increase, and these are becoming more violent and deadly," he was quoted as saying by the newspaper.

Academics and Wits University students took part in a march last week, to protest against the social inequalities they blame for tragedies like Marikana.

"This is what we did in 1948, 1949, 1950 when we protested against the apartheid laws," weeping struggle veteran and advocate George Bizos told Beeld during the march.

"I never thought it would ever be necessary to take part in a march again," he said.

When he was asked if he thought South Africa was becoming more violent, he said "I don't just think so, it's a fact".

According to Burger, violent protests also make it necessary for the police to divert limited resources away from the battle against crime.


Migrants protest Greek wave of racist attacks

Have a good look at the photos below and think about this: what you see in these photos is Greece today.....not some Muslim country. This is happening in Greece as we speak - thousands of Muslims invading the country every day, arriving as illegal immigrants, hoping to get their share of whatever free money any European country is offering them. They come in their thousands hoping to live off the Western democratic system which allows them to practice their fanatical religion and live their backward retarded culture in their new countries, and get paid whilst doing it. And pretty soon you have their women joining them, out breeding the local population and changing the demographic which allows them to start with their demands of Shariah as their numbers grow. Look at France. Look at Germany. Look at Britain. All part of the take-over plan for the creation of the Islam caliphate. Think I'm joking? No, unfortunately not. And then to rub it in the faces of the already suffering Greeks, they hold rallies and protests against the country they've illegally entered to protest their 'illegal' treatment. As if they have any rights when they're there illegally. And then the bleeding hearts start with their nonsense. Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch are there, supporting and encouraging these illegal invaders to take and do as they please and expect the Greeks to just shut up and take it. Attacking the Greeks for speaking out, so as to silence them with shame. I don't think so. Bunch of wankers. Greece should have used this protest to round up even more of them and deport them back to their own Muslim countries, where they belong. What you see in Greece today is the result of allowing this behavior to occur for years and then deciding, oops, maybe it should be stopped. This should never have been allowed to start, ever. Now Greece and the rest of Europe has to deal with this huge influx problem of the invading Muslims. And the White population has to pay for their weak governments mistakes. The price? The browning and destabilisation of their countries, culture and their way of life. All for the dud prize of multi-culturalism. The West is going to pay for this one day, big time. They are going to pay for allowing liberals to ram down their vision of the lie of 'we-are-one' mentality. And to say this out loud is to be labeled racist, Islamophobic and xenophobic. I just don't care anymore. Label away.

Hat tip: Mark L

AFP Photo/Louisa Gouliamaki

AFP Photo/Louisa Gouliamaki

AFP Photo/Louisa Gouliamaki

Thousands of immigrants to Greece, mainly from Pakistan gather at Athens central Syntagma square in front of the Greek Parliament on August 24, 2012, during their protest rally against the recent violent attacks on immigrants by ultra nationalist groups and the police operations in order to arrest undocumented immigrants. (AFP Photo/Louisa Gouliamaki)

Over 3,000 immigrants flocked to the center of Athens to protest the wave of xenophobic attacks sweeping Greece. Racist violence has seen a marked increase in the wake of the financial crisis, with NGOs condemning police indifference to the attacks.

Thousands of protesters marched on the Greek parliament in Athens in one of the largest anti-racist rallies the capital has ever seen. They carried banners emblazoned with the slogans "No Islamophobia" and "Neo Nazis out!"

Some protesters brandished banners implicating Greek far-right party Golden Dawn, which has been accused of inciting xenophobia and racial violence.

Golden Dawn MP Ilias Kasidiaris attacked the Greek government for allowing the rally to take place.
“The constitution protects gatherings of Greeks and not of foreigners,” he said in a statement.

The protests follow a countrywide police crackdown on illegal immigration in Greece. The Greek government provoked immigrant ire after rounding up hundreds of undocumented immigrants in the town of Corinth and holding them in a nearby military camp. The move sparked protests from residents and local authorities, rallying against the creation of a detention center in the town.

"We will do everything possible to prevent such a disaster," Corinth's mayor Alexandros Pnevmatikos told Skai TV. "We don't want the camp, which is in the center of the city close to densely-populated neighborhoods, to become a holding center."

Pnevmatikos threatened to cut the camp’s water supply and rubbish disposal if the 350 migrants held there were not released.

Far right supporters of Golden Dawn clashed with police outside the army camp on Thursday and hurled bottles at a deputy who had come to visit the camp.

The nationwide campaign to curtail illegal immigration has been dubbed "Xenios Zeus" after the ancient Greek god of guests and travelers. The Greek authorities have thus far arrested thousands of illegal immigrants.

Greece’s minister for public order announced on Thursday that a special unit would be created within the Greek police to combat the “phenomenon of racist violence.” The move came after several rights groups criticized Greece for its failure to curb the rise in xenophobic attacks.

Human Rights Watch released a report last month condemning Greek police for their failure to act of cases of racial violence.

"Migrants and asylum seekers spoke to Human Rights Watch of virtual no-go areas in Athens after dark because of fear of attacks by often black-clad groups of Greeks intent on violence,” said the report.
The document also implies collusion between Golden Dawn and local police forces in connection with the attacks.

The extremist party denies any connection to the racial attacks sweeping Greece.

Last month Golden Dawn spokesperson Ilias Kasidiaris said that immigration was a government conspiracy to turn Greece into “a wretched protectorate inhabited by subhumans, with no conscience, with no country, with no national culture.”

One of the party’s solutions to immigration is to mine areas along the Greek border where high concentrations of immigrants cross into the country.

Golden Dawn currently has 18 seats out of 300 in the Greek parliament and has seen a rise in popularity in the wake of an increase in unemployment and crime levels.


Hundreds of Activists Protest at the Republican National Convention

For months now the loony Occupy Movement anarchists, Union thugs and Liberal idiots have been threatening to protest at the Republican National Convention, currently being held in Tampa, Florida. They were going to cause all sorts of mayhem and show everyone who was in charge, and how out of touch the Republicans were. Authorities were so worried that they brought in 1800 law enforcement officers to keep the peace. Below is a picture of the thousands of protesters who decided to show up and give it to the Republicans. How embarrassing though that the law enforcement officers outnumber the pathetic number of protesters who bothered to turn up. These protesters sure are fearless, so it could only be the weather that kept them away......spin as only the Liberals can spin.

Hundreds of senior citizens, religious leaders, community organizers, and Occupy Wall Street activists have descended upon St. Petersburg to protest at the Republican National Convention’s welcome event at Tropicana Field.

More than 1,800 law enforcement officers from federal, state, and local agencies worked in tandem over the last 36 hours to secure the stadium by closing surrounding roads, implementing parking restrictions, and monitoring traffic flow to facilitate the peaceful protests.

Some protesters rode down on buses provided by Occupy, including an activist named Susan, 62, who told the Huffington Post she was laid off from her job in a hospital last fall and has since been receiving unemployment benefits.

There has been a ton of speculation in the media about if Tropical Storm Isaac would scare off the majority of protesters, and while it’s clear the inclement weather did impede on some of the activists’ travel plans, other demonstrators insist they will go forward unimpeded.

The thousands protesting....got to love the Liberals and their fantasies 

Read more here