29 April 2011

Raleigh police charge 2 men with looting business destroyed in tornado

This is like, totally unexpected! The recent tornadoes in Raleigh, North Carolina has produced a few looters. No surprises as to who got arrested. Need I say more?

Okeke Ikechukwu
Okeke Ikechukwu

George Orji
George Orji

Raleigh police arrested two people Tuesday with looting at a business that was destroyed in the April 16 tornadoes.

Police say a witness saw two men going into the Dish Network building on Yonkers Road.

Police have charged 54-year-old George Orji and 50-year-old Ikechukwu Augustine Okeke with second-degree trespassing and felony looting. Okeke also faces a breaking an entering charge.


When the bulbous lady croons

A well written article from Praag about the entitlement culture of the American Blacks. The best line of the piece for me is the following: 'As has been true throughout human history, the dependents America has nurtured will eventually destroy her'. How true. Liberal Whites have always treated the USA Blacks as if they were born without an IQ. Now, the lie repeated over the years has become truth and the mastermind of the lie will become the victim of his own folly.

America’s current financial crisis may become the world’s next plague. By any measure, the situation is dangerously close to popping in much the same way a festering boil explodes when lanced.

Virtually every nation with a minority population is heading in the direction that has destroyed the financial sovereignty of America. Of all the mementos passed from one generation to the next, it may be readily stated, with complete accuracy, that the one thing blacks pass on to their children is a lack of personal responsibility: Without personal responsibility society fragments into a miasma of hopeless dependents.

America’s solution to black dependency has led to the creation of the largest entitlement culture in world history. Obama’s arrival heightened the belief that blacks were finally going to get their ‘stuff’. These days it’s fairly common to hear a black talk about “Obama money” – As though Obama, alone, created. “Obama money”, as it is called, represents the mindset that expects and demands “‘more and more and more free stuff” - At tax payer expense. In fact, Obama’s 2012 budget is so huge - stuffed with entitlement programs for wounded, helpless, victims – that by year’s end an additional two trillion dollars will be stacked on top of America’s impossible debt.

With Obama insisting America must serve as the model for ‘human decency’ and ‘compassion’, it seems reasonable to expect other nations, like South Africa, to toss caution to the wind in favor of dumping money on blacks demanding “more and more and more” from responsible citizens.

Other than plants, I can’t think of another living thing in this universe that is so loathsome, so inept, so unintelligent that it cannot be held responsible for its behavior. According to misguided white altruists, however, blacks are nothing less than close descendants of some sort of bipedal plant now extinct or, perhaps, hiding in the jungle somewhere using a false identity. What ever the case, those of us who see into and through the crippling errors of liberal altruism have a much higher opinion of the ability of blacks to manage their lives quite well – When they’re held responsible for their behavior.

This brings us to the notion of accountability. No person is likely to act responsibly in the absence of accountability as President Johnson and many, many others have sorely learned. President Lyndon Johnson’s vision of a grand, great society included the construction of apartments that would house minorities. The cost for those apartments, at the time, was staggering.

As it happened, a family friend, Bob, was directly engaged in the creation and construction of Johnson’s dream houses. Bob was ecstatic that America was finally, FINALLY, doing something for its “poor, victimized, tragic, sad, pathetically inept blacks”.

The day came when Bob drove to Chicago to celebrate the grand opening of Johnson’s dream. Late that evening, Bob returned, filled with rage, confusion, dismay, disappointment and a little sorrow.

It seems black families had already destroyed almost a quarter of the housing units. Refrigerators, washers and driers – anything that wasn’t nailed down - disappeared. Bob was dumbfounded. He had imagined that providing free housing, free benefits – free ‘everything’ - to blacks would somehow cause them to manifest behaviors consistent with someone who believed he is accountable for his actions. As Bob learned, as many Americans have painfully learned, blacks are just as human as the rest of us: Give them an inch they’ll take a mile.

Take for instance Oprah Winfrey. In the early nineties dear Oprah decided to prove that with a little financial incentive, blacks would achieve ‘great things’. Oprah and friends devised a program. They sent out ads requesting volunteers to take part in a program that would provide them a pathway to ‘freedom’. Over two hundred fifty thousand people applied. Oprah and friends hand selected the best one hundred applicants from the lot.

Oprah poured millions of dollars into her ‘miracle program’. Within a year she quietly shut-down the program. Not one of her ‘hand-picked miracles’ evolved into anything remotely resembling a responsible human being. In fact, Oprah’s volunteers scurried off like a pack of well-fed rats – with so much as a “thank you sister Oprah for proving how stupid you are

Let’s face it: If Oprah cant’ do it what makes any government, or any altruist, believe they can do it?

Even with all the evidence that has mounted over the years, one nation after another is struggling to model itself after America’s failed notion that if you give a man a fish - he’ll keep coming back for more.

After all, there is nothing so mysterious or complicated about fishing that a motivated person can’t learn how to do it on his own – But that implies taking personal responsibility for one’s well-being and, as we know, dependent blacks reject that notion with every ounce of pathetic passion they can muster.

The fact is America’s heart is in the right place: Americans want to be helpful to the helpless. This fact is also true: America is being scammed by a population of con artists and their supporters whose guiltless behaviors allow them to believe they owe no allegiance to other human beings – regardless of the destruction their actions produce.

One has to ask how the ‘entitlement culture’ will react when the endless stream of cash being thrown at them suddenly disappears. Does anybody even reasonably believe they will react favorably?

In fact, this summer will begin the process of affirming the rights of all social dependents. The process is most commonly known as ‘revolution’. Blacks, Hispanics, Indians, Progressive whites, unions and many radicalized groups have bonded together to form an odd assortment of victims whose goals are to disassemble the constitution to make it more favorable to dependency. Dependents have come full circle with their demands, even going so far as to believe home ownership, food, medical care, schooling are a ‘right’. The concept of ‘earning these privileges’ is never mentioned, of course.

Fact is, America’s problems are much, much more than financial.

Watching America’s ever-expanding debt crisis is like watching a finely-tuned female opera singer destroy herself. The day will come, and soon, when she will walk onto the stage to sing her final aria. The floor will pulse and rumble as her massive frame slowly, painfully moves across the stage. Applause will rapidly die as the audience consumes her disgusting visage; they remember when she was young, vital, strong, purposeful and well-defined. Today, she is little more than a second-rate wench whose few remaining attributes are hidden beneath layers and layers of rotting adipose tissue.

As has been true throughout human history, the dependents America has nurtured will eventually destroy her. This strange, suicidal relationship has plagued nations for as long as nations have existed: An irresponsible, dependent group demands nurturing from a responsible host. When all the circumstances are measured, dependents don’t really care what will happen to their American host – Like locusts, they’ll find another nation to pillage.

As South Africa moves ever closer to the American ideal, the pains attending the illusions of social and economic justice will eventually raise an economic boil of monumental proportions and, as South Africans will rapidly discover, lancing the boil is not without dire consequences.


28 April 2011

South Africa: To be a farmer more dangerous than to be a police officer

Another article that states the bleeding obvious. It is now more dangerous to be a farmer in South Africa than to be a policeman. The risk to be killed on a farm is about 30 times higher than in any other part of the community and the attacks are furthermore extremely violent. Where are those wonderful liberals who practically salivated and frothed at the mouth anytime South Africa was mentioned during Apartheid? Don't they care about this group of people who have been murdered willy-nilly? Silly me, they've moved on and are now focussing their energies on the big global warming farce. But, in case any of those liberal wankers are reading this, more FARMERS have been murdered than Blacks were by the SA government during Apartheid. How's that for facts? Yet, there's no outcry. These same frothy liberals spouted nonsense about the millions of Blacks killed yet there is no proof and the lie and perception continues today as a smoke screen and justification for what's happening under a Black ANC government in SA today. The Truth and Reconciliation Commission, headed by Rev Tutu, could only account for 7000 Blacks killed from 1948-1989, with ~2000 of these murders (some say as little as 600) linked to the SA armed services. In comparison, over 3000 farmers have been murdered since 1994. Another startling fact is that 174 220 people were murdered for the period 1994 to 2000 (under Nelson Mandela). South Africa currently has a murder rate of over 18 000 per year - that's what the government's fudged numbers admit too, but many put it closer to 30 000 per year, based on death certificate numbers. Thanks Liberals. Yet another success story to tell your grand kids. Now, about global warming....

The Equality Court in Johannesburg this afternoon learned it now is more dangerous to be a farmer in South Africa than being a member of the police.

This appears from the evidence of Prof. Christiaan Bezuidenhout, criminologist and expert on the influence of music on young people. Prof. Bezuidenhout was the first witness called by TAU SA in the case against Julius Malema and the ANC on the hate speech issue.

Prof. Bezuidenhout testified that farm murders actually should be a special category of crime. Murders committed on farms in South Africa is 700 times higher than the average in the rest of the world. "It's now more dangerous to be a farmer than to be a policeman,” said prof Bezuidenhout..

In 99% of the cases where a murder takes place on a farm, production stops, and every farm murder costs the state R2 million. The risk to be killed on a farm is about 30 times higher than in any other part of the community. The attacks are furthermore extremely violent.

Referring to the song "Shoot the farmers”, Prof. Bezuidenhout testified that he regards it as an inflammatory song. Young people look up to Julius Malema as a role model, and therefore it affects young people's perceptions and he makes an impression on them.

Especially in violent communities people can easily be encouraged by such inflammatory music. In such communities role models play a bigger role. Songs that condone violence or scold people or groups as dogs can influence the youth so that they do not believe it is wrong even if they are not immediately turned to violence. Prof. Bezuidenhout said it is difficult to change the meaning of a song once it has been used in a certain context over a period of time. This is also applicable to the Malema song. This song is also not in line with reconciliation.

Prof. Bezuidenhout suggest that “the song should be placed somewhere in a museum where people can look or listen to it but it certainly does not belong in the public domain."

The case continues.


Australia: Africans having to fight against 'history of failure on blackness'

Here is the Australian equivalent to the USA race-hustler Al Sharpton. Dr Ahmed - a refugee from Eritrea - blames the FAILURE of Black Africans to assimilate on Australia's inability to accept blackness! Wow! So, let me get this all untangled in my small, racist mind. The reason Black Africans don't work, do crime, don't SPEAK English etc.  is down to the inbred racism of White Australians! Dr Ahmed - here's a little hint for you. How about getting your Black community to pull their finger and actually do something about their own situation? It's called PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY. You see, us Whites - we don't have time to sit in a heap and feel sorry for ourselves. We have responsibilities. You know, like raising kids, working, paying bills. We don't have time to nanny you and your Black folk, begging you to come to the party. It's really not our fault you can't speak English. Last I checked, when in Eritrea, speak Eritrean. Understand? You really don't need an 'African Think Tank' - salaries of which are paid by us racist White tax payers - to figure the bleeding obvious out. How about changing your ATTITUDE and lifting your finger and working - and keeping your job by doing it properly so that people are willing to employ you? How about staying out of trouble so that your community doesn't get a bad reputation as trouble makers? Maybe then us racist Whites will actually start respecting you instead of getting fed up by your 'woe is me' and 'you owe us because we have a Black skin' attitude. It's people like you and other government funded 'human rights' committees that make us want to pull our hair out. Get a life, get a job - a real one and not one where  you moan all day on my dime - and then we can speak again. Until then, this anti-blackness Australian resident still thinks you're a bottom-feeder instead of setting an example for your own people, by, you know, WORKING a real job. Oh, and by the way Dr Ahmed - when I arrived at the Melbourne airport after fleeing Black South Africa, I got no humanitarian assistance either but I'm doing just fine. Last I looked, planes departed Melbourne too, so if you're still not happy here you and your fellow unhappy Black folk are free to leave - you could even go to South Africa, where the ANC government is Black and can sympathise with your plight.

A frustrated Berhan Ahmed is tired of endless meetings and wants action to help African immigrants find their place.
Dr Ahmed
AUSTRALIA'S inability to accept ''blackness'' is working against the settlement of African refugees, according to an eminent community leader.
Dr Berhan Ahmed, head of the African Think Tank and the 2009 Victorian Australian of the Year, also said Australia's humanitarian assistance was ''stopping at the airport'', and failed to provide African migrants with the skills to find jobs and engage in society.

Dr Ahmed was speaking out after two brawls involving the Sudanese community, both of which followed a beauty pageant and ended in violent attacks on police.

He condemned the violence as ''appalling and shameful'', but said it was important to analyse the problems that led to the incidents.

Africans experienced racism daily, said Dr Ahmed, a refugee from Eritrea who arrived in Australia in 1987. ''Australia has a black history with black people, and Africans coming with a black skin, they are just copping that sort of Aboriginal black treatment.

''We should have been ambassadors of change and acceptance for blackness. The system still has a problem accepting that blackness.''

Australia has a history of failure on blackness, he argued, ''and that's what's halting Africans in their settlement''.

Dr Ahmed said African refugees were encountering racism when trying to find work. ''People are changing their names to apply for a job. They are putting a different name to be called for an interview. And when they see their face, they tell them, 'Oh sorry, we'll call you again'.''

The Victorian Equal Opportunity and Human Rights Commission last year reported that young African Australians were suffering entrenched racial discrimination. After consultations in Dandenong, Commissioner Helen Szoke said ''systemic barriers'' restricted job prospects for young African Australians, who also said they felt targeted by police.

Anecdotal reports suggested that some employers tried to avoid hiring refugees by framing job descriptions that effectively excluded them.

Dr Ahmed, who last month gave evidence to the Federal Parliamentary inquiry into multiculturalism, said another problem for migrants was boredom and lack of engagement. This resulted from a lack of adequate training and education to equip Africans for jobs.

He argued that refugee policies had not changed in line with the shift in Australia from a manufacturing to a knowledge and service economy. Previous migrant intakes were absorbed into factories, and it was not unusual to hear of people who had not learned English throughout their working lives.

''Now our economy is a knowledge and service economy,'' he said. ''On the first day you have to be able to speak and write [English]. You have to have the qualifications and skills to fit into the system.''

Dr Ahmed expressed a growing frustration with the inability of politicians to address this issue. ''It's all been meeting and meeting and meeting. For the last four or five years, we've been meeting.''

Refugees were getting up to six months' training, then returning to unemployment, he said. ''Families are not getting anywhere. Their kids are also feeling that frustration.''

The issue is not new. In 2007, the then immigration minister Kevin Andrews created a storm when he admitted the Howard government had squeezed the African component of the refugee program because ''some groups don't seem to be settling and adjusting into the Australian way of life''.


UK will not take in migrants fleeing northern Africa, insists May

Europe's Schengen agreement is under threat. The agreement allows 25 EU nations to travel across borders without having their passports checked. To deal with the Tunisian invasion, Italy handed out temporary permits to more than 25,000 Tunisians in the hope that they will depart their country for greener pastures. Many thought their end destination would be France - and maybe some are hoping to stop there and admire the Eiffel tower, but, their ultimate goal is the UK - which is perceived as having a soft touch government with a generous welfare system. Now the UK government is in damage control and hurriedly assuring their citizens that they won't be sharing the burden. My oh my, just what is Europe going to do about these economic refugees, because, let's face it - that's what they are. These people fought for 'freedom' in their own country, yet barely was their revolution cold and most of the MALES were on boats shouting viva Italia. Notice that there are no women amongst these so called 'refugees'? Wonder why that is? Are only the men being persecuted in Tunisia, or could it be that they're just waiting to settle in their new tax-payer funded council flat (with perks) and then write home to their loved ones and 10 kids to hop on the nearest plane to join them in the land of milk and honey? Europe can expect more of the same, as Gidaffi - for all his faults - kept the masses of Black Africans from Europe's shores. Now it's open refugee season for all and this problem is going to grow worse. Both France and Italy are backing the war kinetic military action in Libya in the hope of benefiting from cheap oil, but, they haven't yet realised the huge can of immigrant worms they've opened. These North African countries are dumps so Europe and her civilised way of life is a huge draw card. Then there's the coming-soon-to-a-cinema-near-you Egyptian crisis as many of the Coptic Christians will be fleeing before they're beheaded by the religion of peace. Roll on the good times...

Italy calls for £85m to assist Tunisian refugee influx

The Home Secretary has told her EU counterparts that Britain is not prepared to join any “burden sharing” as tens of thousands of people cross in to Europe, The Daily Telegraph can disclose.

Italy, where the refugees are arriving on a daily basis, has urged its EU partners to help ease the pressure by accepting some of the migrants.

But at a meeting of her justice and home affairs counterparts last week Mrs May said Britain will only offer support to Italy to help deal with the issue there.

She will repeat her firm stance when the EU Justice and Home Affairs Council meets again next month.

It came as British MEPs warned migrants could head for Britain because it is seen as a soft option and called for action to stop camps building up at Calais.

A borderless scheme on mainland Europe is already under threat amid growing tensions over the plight of the fleeing refugees and migrants.

More than 25,000 Tunisians have arrived in Italy since unrest there and thousands of Libyans are expected to try to head for Europe. More than 14,000 crossed in to Tunisia in the last two weeks alone.

More migrants from sub-Sahara Africa are also likely to cross because Col Muammar Gaddafi is no longer stopping them in Libya.

A row developed between France and Italy earlier this week when the former stopped a train carrying Tunisians migrants at the border.

Under the so-called Schengen agreement, citizens in 25 EU nations are allowed to travel across borders without having their passports checks.

The UK and Ireland are not part of the agreement and control their own borders.

However, Italy has caused anger among its neighbours by handing temporary permits to more than 25,000 Tunisians after other EU countries declined to help accommodate them.

It effectively gives them unobstructed travel around the union.

Gerard Batten, the Ukip MEP for London, said: "People are going to gravitate to Britain.

“Britain is top of the list because we have one of the most generous welfare benefits systems and we are famous for being a soft touch.

"I don't have any confidence in the authorities doing anything to stop them coming in.

“"There is a human crisis, but the approach of giving people residence permits will make things permanent, rather than encourage people to return home when peace in Libya and the whole of north Africa finally returns.

“The problem here for us is the European borderless state."

Richard Ashworth, the Conservative MEP for South East England, added: "The Calais authorities have recently taken action to remove the immigrants in the town intending to enter the UK.

“Both the French and British authorities need to remain vigilant to ensure this bottleneck does not occur again if large numbers of people from North Africa enter France.

“The sad days of squalid camps in the woods and British hauliers running the Calais gauntlet must not be allowed to happen again."

The growing tensions in Europe has put the Schengen agreement under threat.

Along with France, the Netherlands, Belgium, Austria and Germany are understood to be considering reintroducing some border checks.

A Home Office spokesman said: "A common asylum system or new laws will not resolve the unprecedented influx of migrants at Europe's Mediterranean border.

"Britain has offered Italy practical assistance to help maintain their border controls and asylum processes. Those seeking international protection are expected to claim asylum in the first safe country they enter. Those who have no genuine claim to protection should be returned to their home countries quickly.

"We retain the right to not opt into any agreement which will weaken Britain's borders."


UK University campuses are 'hotbeds of Islamic extremism'

The UK universities - breeding grounds for Islamic fundamentalists - are turning a blind eye to this growing problem because they don't want to 'spy' on students! Apparently, they don't know how to deal with the problem. These same institutes receive millions in bribes aid from Muslim countries so push the Islamic agenda - so my guess is that they don't want to stop the gravy train of free money - money that's not so free when they are selling their morals, souls and their fellow citizens down the river in order to receive it. Well, how DO you get rid of this problem on campuses? They could start by banning radical speakers who go to preach there; or they could stop accepting money from Islamic countries; or they could stop the import and dissemination of extremist written material and speech which promotes hatred. You could also treat these radicals as the UK government currently treats the English Defence League - by labelling and demonising them as 'far-right' racists. The EDL - apparently a huge national threat - whose mission it is to preserve the English way of life, are treated as pariahs and outcasts - but Islamic fundamentalists who would happily blow the whole country up, are just grand. There, you have my top four right-off-the-cuff ideas - without spending any money on a think-tank.  Problem solved...and I'm not even a genius academic!

Hat tip: Rextrut

Islamic fundamentalism is being allowed to flourish at universities, endangering national security, MPs and peers said yesterday.

Academics are turning a blind eye to radicals because they do not want to spy on students, a report claimed.

Despite "damning evidence" of a serious problem, little progress had been made in tackling the unsustainable situation, the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Homeland Security said.

They urged the Government to tackle the issue on campuses with "utmost urgency".

Such extremism "endangers our security at home and has international implications that are serious enough to threaten our alliance relationships", said the group, which includes the former home secretary Lord Reid.

Secret files obtained by The Daily Telegraph and WikiLeaks disclosed this week that at least 35 terrorists held at Guantánamo Bay were indoctrinated by extremists in Britain.

The leaked documents, written by senior US military commanders, illustrated how Britain effectively became a crucible of terrorism over the course of two decades.

The parliamentary group was set up two years ago to carry out research into homeland security issues.

Its inaugural report comes after a separate inquiry by the umbrella organisation for universities earlier this year said animal rights extremists posed a greater problem than Islamist radicals.

Universities UK, which represents vice-chancellors, said it could do very little about extremism on campus. Instead it issued new guidance on the importance of freedom of speech. Their report followed the attempt by Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, a former student at University College London, to blow himself up using a bomb in his underpants as a flight came in to land at Detroit on Christmas Day, 2009.

Abdulmutallab, an engineering student, was the Islamic Society president from 2006 to 2007.

The parliamentarians' report said Britain's homeland security strategy failed to address in sufficient detail how to tackle the threat of extremism at universities, how to strengthen businesses' ability to deal with a terrorist attack and how to ensure security over the internet.

The report said some universities and colleges had become sites where extremist religion and radicalism could flourish "beyond the sight of academics".

They also noted that there was a "reluctance to co-operate with the police on the part of some universities that did not want to be seen to be 'spying' on their students".

The MPs and peers said universities presented a "unique challenge". However, "in some cases [they] evidently struggle to establish the correct balance between academic freedoms and university authorities' responsibilities as part of ensuring homeland security."

In the report, entitled Keeping Britain Safe, the MPs and peers said the problem of universities as places of radicalisation required "urgent and sustained attention by the new Government".

Several witnesses had flagged up "serious problems" evident in universities and the issue was of "grave concern." The problems they cited included examples of extremist preachers being invited on to campuses.

Abdulmutallab was only one in a long line of university students to become involved in terrorism.

A recent survey found that 31 per cent of those convicted of terrorist-related offences had attended university and 10 per cent were still students when they were arrested. Two of the July 7 bombers had been students.

Think tanks have highlighted a succession of extremist speakers invited to deliver lectures unopposed at university Islamic societies, including UCL.

Westminster University recently elected students with links to the extremist group Hizb ut-Tahrir as president and vice-president of the student union.

The report also raised “significant concerns” over unregulated foreign funding of universities. It said that, in many cases, the funding had a political purpose and could have direct effects upon the institutional structure, curriculum, appointments and the schedule of events.

The London School of Economics was among the controversial recipients of foreign aid, accepting a donation of £1.5 million from a trust controlled by Col Muammar Gaddafi’s son, Saif.

The report quoted one witness, Prof Anthony Glees, of Buckingham University, who said Arab and other foreign governments had ploughed £240 million into Islamic studies courses at universities over the past 10 years.

The report said the role of businesses in preparing for emergencies such as terrorist attacks was “highly problematic”.

The Government’s new counter-terrorism strategy will aim to “prevent the import and dissemination of extremist written material and speech which promotes hatred” on campus, the report said.

“These are welcome initiatives which must be implemented forcefully,” the MPs

The report also found that the processes behind the National Security Strategy (NSS) and the Strategic Defence and Security Review (SDSR) were “deeply unsatisfactory”.

“Too much was done in too little time, consultations were not extensive enough and it presents a lost opportunity for a sophisticated debate about internal and external defence,” it said.

Bernard Jenkin, the group’s chairman, said: “The NSS and SDSR are not a satisfactory basis for the UK’s homeland security strategy for the next five years.”


27 April 2011

Bar on benefits lifted for East European migrants who will be able to claim £250 a week

More good news for UK tax payers. From Sunday, rules that ban Eastern Europeans from claiming unemployment, housing and council tax benefits until they have worked in the UK for 12 months are being lifted! Yes, that's correct - Eastern Europeans may now step into the UK and demand all three of these perks immediately as long as they can prove they meet their own countries’ requirements for unemployment benefit, are seeking to work, and are ‘habitually resident’ here. Seasoned dole bludgers should find these terms easy enough to fleece. When the wall came down in Germany people thought that it was the end of communism. Surprise!! The stupid European/UK governments have allowed communism in by the EU Trojan horse and they can't get enough! The first country to pull out of the EU will earn my respect. Until then, the UK tax payer will have to suffer and pay for their new economic migrants - to the predicted tune of £30million a year. But, as we all know, that figure is just a red herring and the true cost will be far greater. After all, when the UK joined the EU in 2004,  it was estimated that only 13,000 workers would want to move there....and we can all see that figure was spot on!!

Open door policy: From next week, East European migrants could claim benefits within weeks of arriving in the UK

Britain faces a new influx of migrants who could claim benefits of up to £250 a week within weeks of arriving.

From next Sunday, rules that ban Eastern Europeans from claiming unemployment, housing and council tax benefits until they have worked in the UK for 12 months are being lifted.

Critics are concerned about the risk of ‘benefits tourism’ by immigrants from the eight former Communist countries affected.

It is feared that the relaxed rules will attract new immigrants, as well as persuading the one million or so Eastern Europeans already in Britain to stay.

When the countries joined the EU in 2004, their citizens were barred from claiming jobseeker’s allowance or housing and council tax benefits in the UK until they had worked here for 12 months continuously. The stringent rules meant few qualified.

But the restrictions were time-limited – it was always intended they would end when a transition period finished seven years after the countries joined the EU.

From next Sunday they will be treated exactly the same as Britons. They will be able to claim the three benefits immediately, as long as they can prove they meet their own countries’ requirements for unemployment benefit, are seeking to work, and are ‘habitually resident’ here.

The ‘habitually resident’ qualification means they will usually have to have been here for three months.

The countries are: Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Slovenia. They still tend to be poorer than Western European nations and wages and benefits are less generous. Professor Krystyna Iglicka, an expert in migration from the Centre for International Relations in Warsaw, said: ‘These new benefit rules will make Poles feel even more at home in Britain and it is another reason why they will never leave.’

Kamil Lesniak, a 20-year-old barman from the south-west Polish town of Taenobrzeg, said he would be on his way to the UK ‘tomorrow’ if the British benefits system could match his monthly income of £450.

Eva Katona, 22, is considering moving to Britain from the Hungarian capital, Budapest, to work as a nanny or carer.

‘The unemployment benefit in England is higher than a salary here and I have been told I can go on the dole as soon as I get there,’ she said.

‘It is not my intention to do that but it is nice to have the sort of security you would not find here.’

Since the EU expanded in 2004, Britain has experienced its largest wave of migration, despite official predictions that only 13,000 workers would want to move here.

The Home Office said it did not know how many migrants would be attracted to Britain by the benefits rules changes, although it estimates they will cost £30million a year.

Sir Andrew Green, chairman of campaign group MigrationWatch UK, said: ‘The Government has not asked the question because it does not want to hear the answer.

‘This is a space that will need careful watching. There’s no way of knowing what effect this change will be but there is clearly a risk that the British welfare state will be exploited.’

The Department for Work and Pensions insisted that the rule changes will not mean people will be able simply to come to the UK and start claiming benefits – because there will be strict tests.

The rules have to be lifted because they conflict with the EU’s freedom of movement laws.

■ A poll has found that most of the public want an end to the ‘something for nothing’ benefits system.

The survey, by YouGov for the Policy Exchange think-tank, found 80 per cent believe people capable of work but unemployed for 12 months should carry out community work in return for benefits.

Fifty per cent say benefits are too generous, while 66 per cent say there should be no extra child benefit after the third child.


Officials: KTLA Viewer Assists Arrest in Disabled Bus Passenger Beating

Another sickening Black-on-White beating - this time a defenceless autistic man on a bus is beaten up by a Black because he took offence to the man speaking to himself. Is this the cultural depths that the Black community in the USA has been reduced to? Has hundreds of years of living with civilised people not taught them better than this? Of course you won't hear the Black community leaders out there distancing themselves from such behaviour. They usually end up on the MSM defending it because of their history etc. Blacks were obviously absent when the Personal Responsibility gene was being handed out.


SAN BERNARDINO (KTLA) -- Police have arrested a man suspected in the brutal attack of a disabled man on a San Bernardino bus.

Ronald Jackson, 44, was already in a San Bernardino County jail for a carjacking-related arrest on April 11, one day after the beating, according to police.

Authorities said they received a tip from a KTLA viewer earlier this week identifying Jackson.

Jackson, a resident of San Bernardino, was also on parole for a conviction of assault with a deadly weapon.

The attack happened on April 10, shortly after 5 p.m. near 15th Street and Medical Center Drive and was captured on surveillance video.

In the minutes leading up to the attack, police say the suspect was confrontational with passengers on the bus, and then he attacked an innocent disabled bystander because the man was talking to himself.

The victim, who suffers from autism, was hit and kicked repeatedly before taking off on foot.

San Bernardino District Attorney will file charges against Jackson on Friday.


Migrant row threatens EU open-border policy

All of a sudden, the French government fears 'disturbances to public order' if most of the 25 000 Tunisian 'refugees' that landed recently in Italy invade their country. Really? So, the influx of African Blacks and Muslims into the country over the years has been just peachy for the local population then, has it? I say, let them in and look after them France, as you're the first in the congo-line when it comes to pushing miscegenation and the multi-cultural Utopian dream onto your people. Let them feel all the love and diversity because it 'enriches' them - or doesn't it? Luckily for the people of France, it's an election year, otherwise Mr Sarkozy would just be letting these 'refugees' in without regard for his citizens feelings or the public order disturbances that he's now championing. As a result, the French National Front party's ratings have gone through the roof on the back of the anti-immigration sentiment sweeping Europe. Apparently, European people are no longer falling for the 'cultural enriching' lies and are starting to see and live the effects without their PC blinkers on. Hello Governments of Europe - I think your people are SICK and TIRED of constantly being invaded by third-world backward cultures which have NO interest in becoming part of their new law-abiding communities. Centuries ago, Europe was the hotbed of civilisation - yet today, all one thinks of when Europe is mentioned is the immigration problem it faces . I have no interest to visit there. I really don't want to step off the plane and see women covered in bed-sheets with only their eyes showing. I don't want to walk down the street and wonder if I'm in Pakistan or in a First-world European country. This immigration issue just sucks the life out of these countries for no good reason. What have these people contributed to enriching their new countries apart from bringing different food dishes (as the Libs love to espouse as they scrape the barrel in justification)? I can't think of much apart from them mostly sucking off the welfare teat and boosting the local prison numbers - and population figures. Yet, Europe continues to import these people in the hope that they will one day have their ah-ha moment and the intelligence and civility light-bulb will flicker to life. Batten down the hatches people, there will be more of this coming Europe's way when the Egyptian, Libyan and other ME countries start imposing their Muslim Brotherhood inspired Sharia politics on their people. Millions will be fleeing to Europe, you lucky people with the open borders.

FRANCE and Italy have threatened to tear up the open-borders mandate that has been the European Union's signature accomplishment for 16 years.

French President Nicolas Sarkozy is holding emergency talks in Rome on Tuesday with Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi after a row over an influx of Tunisian refugees into Europe threatened to spiral out of control and lead to the reintroduction of French border controls.

Mr Berlusconi's decision to give more than 25,000 Tunisian refugees residence permits - allowing them to travel through Europe - has caused the worst border crisis since EU countries signed the 1995 Schengen Treaty.

Mr Sarkozy sparked a major diplomatic incident last week after closing the rail border with Italy at Ventimiglia.

The French have criticised the ''flawed'' EU rules that let Tunisian migrants into France and bar trains carrying them, saying they fear disturbances to public order.

Mr Sarkozy is facing re-election next year and is under attack from anti-immigrant, far-right politicians.

France has accused Italy of encouraging the Arab migrants - who are mainly French-speaking - to travel on to France with the permits.

Periodic border checks with Italy have been reinstated and several hundred Tunisians, bearing the residence permits, have been sent back to Italy.

Mr Berlusconi has argued that he gave the Tunisians permits after the EU refused to activate a refugee burden-sharing scheme when Italy faced an influx of Arabs fleeing recent regional conflicts.

He has accused the EU of failing to help Italy and even questioned the value of belonging to the union.

The crisis is to be debated by the European Commission on May 4 and then discussed 11 days later at a meeting of EU interior ministers.

The French are accusing the Italians of deliberately issuing the immigrants with permits, releasing them from detention centres, directing them towards France and even buying their train tickets.

Italian Foreign Minister Franco Frattini has said that Rome will accept a review of Schengen, including temporary French border controls, in return for EU cash to help deal with Arab migrants.

''Schengen needs a check-up. All treaties age, inevitably,'' he said. ''A review is needed to adapt this agreement to a rapidly changing world.''

Italy and France are also expected to demand a $12 billion European aid package for North Africa to stem the influx of migrants by helping with the regional transition to democracy.

European diplomats are concerned that Italian resentment goes deeper than the refugee crisis, however. Italy is angry that France has taken the lead on Libya by launching military action and recognising Libyan rebels.

Mr Berlusconi, a close ally of Muammar Gaddafi, was annoyed not to have been consulted over decisions affecting Italy's region and has refused to allow Italian fighters to take part in NATO bombing raids over Libya.

In France, anger over immigration has boosted the National Front party's ratings before next year's elections.

Paris wants Schengen reformed to make it easier to reinstate controls if any more external crises trigger another flood of migrants.

The treaty allows the 25 member states to temporarily suspend border-free travel for security reasons.


26 April 2011

Woman charged for brutal McDonald's beating was arrested for assault last year at the SAME restaurant

A few days ago I posted a video to two Black teenagers attacking a White female. Now it turns out that one of the female thugs is a repeat offender, having attacked and beaten two White females at the same McDonald's last year. The 38 year mother and her daughter (of an undisclosed age) were beaten relentlessly. Brown should have been charged with racial hate crimes and locked away, but instead, Maryland Judge Norman R. Stone issued a “do not prosecute” order on her two assault charges. Brown was released back into society to continue with her terrorising.The 'female' victim that these two thugs attacked on 18 April is transgendered and probably the only reason it's come to light. The attack was ignored until the transgender community became aware that one of their own had been attacked and all of a sudden it's just fine and dandy and justified to proceed with prosecuting this as a hate crime. If it were a lowly straight White woman beaten then it would have been ignored. This is how low we have stooped in this world.

Charged: Teonna Brown is accused of brutally attacking a transgender woman at a Baltimore County McDonald's
Teonna Brown

The teenager accused of brutally beating a transgender woman at a McDonald's in Baltimore County was arrested for assault last year - at the same restaurant.

Police today announced they had charged Teonna Monae Brown, 18, after a video emerged of her and another girl allegedly kicking, punching and stamping on Chrissy Lee Polis.

The attack was so violent the 22-year-old had a seizure.

Brown's own sister turned her in on Friday, telling police she and her alleged accomplice, a 14-year-old girl, had admitted to the attack.

News of her arrest came as transgender activists announced they would be holding a protest outside the Rosedale restaurant at 7pm today.

Yesterday Miss Polis revealed how she was 'afraid to go outside' after the April 18 assault, which she hinted could be racially motivated as the two attackers were both black.

And, in what could be a major blow for McDonald's family-friendly image, she claimed staff stood by and allowed the attack to continue.

One worker, Vernon Hackett, filmed the beating and later posted it online, where it attacked hundreds of thousands of viewers.

According to police Brown was arrested last July for allegedly attacking a mother after a dispute inside the same McDonald's.

In a handwritten police statement seen by the Smoking Gun, mother-of-two Danielle Dower, 38, described how Brown allegedly followed her out of the restaurant yelling : 'Did you call me ugly?'

She said Brown 'kept trying to badger us' after she said no and tried to move away with her two daughters.

Mrs Dower claims Brown pushed her, but when she pushed back she 'took her fist and threw a punch to my face.'

In an attempt to get her children to safety, Mrs Dower went into a nearby shopping centre, but claims Brown and two friends followed them inside.

As she called 911, the two friends allegedly seized her daughter by the hair and dragged her across the floor.

She wrote: 'I had to stop talking to the operator, get on top of my daughter and protect her while trying to fight off those girls.'

The fight left her with cuts to her face, and her eldest daughter suffered cuts to her knee and face as well as bruising to her forehead.

Brown was charged with two counts of misdemeanour assault, but according to the state attorney the victim later asked for all charges to be dropped, and the case never went to court.

Now she faces three first and second-degree assault charges in connection with the April 18 assault of Miss Polis.

The 14-year-old, who was also reported by Brown's sister, has been charged as a juvenile.

She has not been named, but police claim she admitted in an interview that she and Brown 'both got into a fight with a woman over using the bathroom.'

Yesterday state's attorney Scott D. Shellenberger said hate crime charges were being considered.

He said: 'If there is evidence that the crime was racially motivated, we will take a look at those charges and see if we meet those elements. We have the ability, if the facts are there, to upgrade the charges at a later date.'

Yesterday their alleged victim, Miss Polis, spoke out for the first time about the beating she received.

She said she was afraid to go outside after the attack. She said: 'They just hurt me really bad, and I'm afraid to go outside now because of stuff like this.'

In an interview with the Baltimore Sun, she said the violence kicked off after she had used the ladies' restrooms in the McDonald's outlet, but denied reports that this was the reason why the violence erupted.
She said of her attackers: 'They just seemed like they wanted to pick a fight that night.'

She said she was approached by one of the girls, who accused her of 'looking at my man'.

When Miss Polis insisted that she was not even aware of the girl's partner, the physical abuse began with the girl spitting in her face.

She said: 'She started ripping my hair, throwing me on the floor, kicking me in my face.

'I got up and tried to hit the girl. I had her in a corner, to try to get her off me, and the other girl came up and started kicking me in my face, punching me in my nose, ripping my earring out of my earlobes.'

Miss Polis said there was no way to escape the attack, adding: ' Every time I tried to walk away they followed me.'

Fired: Vernon Hackett, the employee who shot the footage, has been sacked from his job at the McDonald's outlet

Miss Polis said: 'Everybody in that McDonald's sat there and watched me get hurt. Nobody did nothing at all.

'And then they tried to tell [the girls] to leave because the cops were coming, so they could protect them and not me.

'I remember the guy working at McDonald's was taping me on his cell phone, and I told him to get it out of my f***ing face. And he sat there, and he must have taped me even further.'

Read more here

USA: Importing Disaster - Demographic Changes Mean Democrat Future

Sometimes it gets pretty depressing researching posts for my blog. Here is one that really hits home. I'm so tired of stupid Western governments using mass immigration as their way to combat slow birth rates. Just what do they think will happen with these same immigrants get to a pensionable age? Ship them back to where they came from? By allowing mass immigration now, they'll need to import more and more people yearly to keep the pension/welfare pyramid going. How about encouraging their own youth to start families by giving them tax incentives and child-care assistance? But, not only do Whites have to contend with paying high taxes to their spendthrift, entitlement-loving governments, they also have to battle against all the PC crap they're exposed to as well as the anti-social policies like gay marriage, abortions and divorce which all destroy the family bonds. Then there's also the diversity/multi-culturalism indoctrination and inter-racial propaganda, not to mention the Global Warming scam, which just wants to suck more money from the White world. What hope do we have? This article points out how dangerous mass immigration has become for the USA. The US White population has sharply declined from 69% in 2000 to 63.7% in 2010 and this should be sounding warning bells all around the White world. We've seen this also happening in Europe, UK and Canada. Australia and New Zealand are also under attack. NZ friends I speak to are worried about the number of Asians (including Indians) and other non-Whites coming into that country, so Australia isn't alone on this self-destructive drive. Thanks lousy lefty governments for giving us this to look forward to. We, the White race, are our own worst enemy and only have ourselves to blame. We may be a clever race, but we sure are dumb and easily hood-winked by anyone with a bridge to sell us.

At a gathering some years ago, I had a political conversation with a man who had recently arrived here from Denmark. He was advocating his home country's socialist system, which, of course, led to profound disagreement. He was good natured and cordial, however, so the debate ended on a polite note. Yet it also ended on an ironic one: When asked if he wanted to return home, his answer was no.

This is a common phenomenon. We see it, for instance, in liberal northerners who move to the South for the lower taxes and cost of living and greater freedom, but then continue to vote for the kind of politicians who made the Northeast a nice place to leave. And while this befuddles many, it's simply man's nature. Of course people want that which is good, such as a better lifestyle, but wanting and attaining are two different things. Everyone wants good health, for example, but many nevertheless are too attached to unhealthful foods and practices to relinquish them. Oh, they might move into your healthy body if they could, but they would likely do to it what a government-subsidized project does to a good neighborhood.

Now, there is a reason why I'm talking about how a change in location doesn't equate to a change in ideology. In the Financial Times recently, Richard McGregor reported on the latest population data, writing:

The electorate has become less white and more Hispanic more rapidly than predicted, according to the national census, two trends that will influence elections for decades.
... Mr Obama and the Democrats have long had a significant lead among minority voters, [and these demographic changes are] lifting their chances of taking states such as Nevada, Georgia and Arizona [which were] lost in 2008.
As to the rate of this change, McGregor writes:
The non-Hispanic white population dropped from 69.1 per cent in 2000 to 63.7 per cent in 2010. By contrast, the minority population, which includes African Americans and African Asians [sic], jumped from 30.9 per cent to 36.3 during the same period.
Ironically, while McGregor cites whites' lower fertility rate, he doesn't even once mention the 800-lb statist in the middle of the room: immigration. I guess being flooded with unassimilable foreigners is now taken so for granted that it no longer even warrants mention.

What McGregor does do is discuss immigration's effects, as he, quoting the National Journal, asks "whether Republicans can increase their advantage among whites enough to overcome what is likely to be a growing share of the overall vote cast by minorities [in 2012]."

The answer?

It doesn't matter.

As long as we continue our suicidal immigration policies -- where 85 percent of newcomers hail from the Third World and Asia (thanks, Ted Kennedy) -- the only thing that will be in question about our descent into socialism, and perhaps beyond, is the rate.

Despite this, like McGregor, all most conservatives talk about is 2012 this and 2012 that. Yet, what good is fighting for momentary political success if you don't secure the cultural foundation of which it's born? And how can you enjoy the latter when the rate of cultural invasion greatly exceeds the rate of assimilation?

Remember that people create the government; government doesn't create the people. If you replace Westerners with Muslims, you no longer have Christendom (or even the shell of it we now inhabit) but Iran West. And if you replace apple-pie Americans with I-want-your-piece-of-the-pie socialists, you no longer have the US but the USSR redux. Oh, of course, our immigration scheme isn't replacing us in one fell swoop; instead, it's happening incrementally, which all the frogs in the frying pan of water don't really seem to notice much. But as the aforementioned census data demonstrates, those increments are becoming bigger -- and more rapid. And a death by a thousand cuts is still a death.

So we may talk about how Tea Parties are "waking people up," but conservatives are asleep; the reality they're ignoring is that there are fewer who can be woken up all the time. While you're attempting the daunting task of re-education, the statists are importing ready-made voters. You're fertilizing the tree in the hope it will bear more fruit.

The statists are chopping it down and are planting a new tree.

And it never seems to occur to conservatives that we should try to take the axe away. Virtually every time someone complains about illegal migration, it's accompanied by the disclaimer, "Now, I have no problem with legal immigration..." In fact, this blind devotion to our colonization (I call this devotion "immigrationism") is so great that warnings about it are usually met with crickets chirping. So I will spell it out.

According to my calculations, on average, groups descended from the new immigrants in question vote for leftists approximately 79 percent of the time. This means that 79 percent of 36.3 percent of the population now supports statists (on top of the whites who do), and the latter figure is up almost 6 points in just 10 years. Soon it will be 79 percent of 40.

Then 79 percent of 50.

Then 60.

And 70, and, well, does anyone get it?

Or do I still hear crickets?

So what does this mean for the future? Well, in the 1990s, we had Bill Clinton and many people thought it couldn't get any worse than the Wizard of Is. Eight years after he left office, however, we got Barack Obama, and now, once again, some think it can't get any worse.

But they are wrong.

Just wait until Malia Obama is running.

On the right.

And who might be running to her left? Well, since our imported socialists come not from Denmark but south of the border, that is where I'll look for possibilities.

Perhaps he will be like the new president of Brazil, Dilma Rousseff, who was a Marxist guerrilla.

Maybe like Bolivia's Evo Morales, whose Movement towards Socialism Party has given the nation the "Law of Mother Earth" legislation, which grants human rights to nature (animals, trees, insects, etc.). This resurrection of Bolivia's pagan past will be enforced by a bureaucracy called the "Ministry of Mother Earth."

Or that future candidate could reflect Ecuador's Rafael Correa, who has called for a socialist Latin America and has nationalized the assets of "uncooperative" oil companies.

He could also look like the man against whose socialist government we fought a proxy war in the 1980s, Nicaraguan president Daniel Ortega.

And then there is Mr. Ego and Mouth himself, Hugo Chavez. 'Nuff said.

Of course, we could get lucky and just end up like Mexico, a kleptocratic, drug-cartel-plagued state with socialist tendencies.

And we're well on the road to such Third Worldism. Many conservatives are waiting for the next Ronald Reagan, but they miss the point. The question is not "Where are all the leaders?" but something else:

Where are all the followers?

Answer: dying off and being replaced.

In 1984, Reagan enjoyed a 49-state landslide victory, losing only Walter Mondale's home state, Minnesota, by a narrow margin. Today, however, he not only would likely lose states such as Massachusetts, Hawaii, Vermont and New York, to name a handful, he wouldn't even carry his home state of California. And consider who Americans elected a mere 20 years after Reagan left office: a man who spent those 20 years sitting in a bigoted, anti-American church; a man with a 2007 voting record to the left of that of the Senate's only avowed socialist (Bernie Sanders). "And imagine," some will say, "that man, Barack Obama, was elected by the same nation!"

But he wasn't.

Just by people residing within the same borders.

And these are the consequences of not controlling the cultural elements that come into your land and, through the process the Soviets called "demoralization," are raised up out of it.

Of course, my predictions are based on certain assumptions, not the least of which is that there will be an intact American republic to elect a leader in the future. But with how balkanized we are -- the left-right and secular-religious divides, groups such as La Raza (the Race) and MEChA and the desire to "reconquer" Ca. and the Southwest in Mexico's name -- this is not a given.

If traditionalists have to compete against a national tide like that, the crickets will soon be chirping over Western civilization in North America.


Australia: Men wounded with machete, chain during wild brawl

This is what diversity brings Australia. Australia has taken in Sudanese Blacks from Africa as refugees (no comment) and year-in-year-out they hold 'beauty' pageants and year-in-year-out, they end up in people being sent to hospital. Click here for a link to the Andrew Bolt blog, where he outlines all the attacks perpetrated by this community in just ONE MONTH. I can guarantee you that there are many more attacks than is admitted to because the Victorian police censors the race of perpetrators. I don't know how a police service expects members of the community to assist them with sighting criminals when they describe them as male and of average build. Yup, that's how we live here - we have to smell the race to give us a clue as to who we're supposed to be looking out for. What I have noticed is that if the suspect is Caucasian then the race is usually stated - so, if race is omitted then chances are good the perpetrators are non-White. In any case, enough of that PC crap. I lived with African Blacks for over 37years so I think I qualify to comment on the culture and mentality of the tribe. Tip number one: Blacks and alcohol do not mix well. Tip number two: Blacks and civilised behaviour are poles apart and never the two shall meet. Australia isn't content to have a peaceful country and felt the need to import these troubled, uncivilised people to spice up their lives. Granted, there may be a few Sudanese who are actually grateful to be here, but the majority have shown - especially the young Black males - that they would rather be back in their own country where they can live like true Africans. According to the police, the public should see this incident as just another random event - just like all the other random acts which happen in Melbourne daily. These Blacks didn't mean anyone any harm - honest - as apparently they only take machetes, knives and bike chains with them when they're going to have a good old party with their mates. Prior to the old Labor government mucking up the Victorian police service by employing a PC female top-cop, Melbourne had one of the safest cities in the world. Our PC female top-cop feminised the force and we now sit with the repercussions - people who treat the police force as a joke. As a result, police who responded to this incident were pelted with glass bottles and last night, another flare up occurred which left two police officers injured - one pelted with a glass bottle, and the other punched in the back of the head. Let's hope this PC police culture will change under our new, no-nonsense Minister!

Miss South Sudan brawl
A Sudanese beatuy pagent after-party ended in a massive brawl in Melbourne's Clayton
 AN UGLY brawl that interrupted a beauty pageant after-party has left one man requiring plastic surgery to his slashed face and stab wounds on his hands.

The party, which took place after the Miss South Sudan Australia beauty pageant, attracted more than 1000 people to a Monash City Council hall in Clayton last night.

Detective Senior Constable Dean Trigger said the 28-year-old stabbing victim had intervened when he saw a friend involved in a brawl with approximately 15 Sudanese men, believed to be in their mid 20s, at 2.20am.

He was then attacked with a machete, hit in the mouth with the blade and stabbed in the hand three times.

The victim, from Hampton Park, also suffered welts after he was struck on the back with what police believe was a bike chain.

He was taken to hospital for surgery on his hand and lip. His friend, aged 32, was also taken to hospital with cuts to his ear.

"The victim was at the after-party for the Sudanese beauty pageant," Det Sen Constable Trigger said.

"He has left the hall and gone out for a cigarette, seen his friend in the brawl and he has gone across to assist his friend."

Twelve police and three dog squad units were needed to shut down the fight, during which bottles were thrown at a police van.

Yesterday's party had been advertised on the Facebook page for the Miss South Sudan Beauty Pageant Australia.

Today, the administrator of the Miss South Sudan Beauty Pageant Australia site posted on the Facebook wall telling people to watch the television news for "a review of our show is on tonight p.s. positive outcomes!''.

A pageant organiser said he did not know what sparked the fight.

"I didnt even know who was fighting or what they were fighting about," the organiser, Phillip, told radio station 3AW.

"I think the fights always start when two or three get into it, then it just gets out of proportion.

"I was really upset that there was a fight because at the end of the day it is damaging to the reputation of our community."

He said there were 10 security guards at the hall and no alcohol was being served.

A number of neighbours called 000 when the party got out of control, complaining about fighting and bottles being smashed.

The first officers who arrived at the scene were forced to wait for backup as they were pelted with glass bottles.

No officers were injured, but it took police two hours to bring the party under control.

No arrests have been made.

A spokesman for the Sudanese Community Association of Australia declined to comment.


WikiLeaks: Guantánamo Bay terrorists radicalised in London to attack Western targets

Our Western governments are gutless. That's what you can conclude when you read that the UK government knew that mosques in London were being used to indoctrinate and radicalise extremists for their little Jihad against anyone who doesn't sticking their bums into the air. Two of the worst offenders were both living off state benefits after claiming asylum. So, the question is: if they knew about it, why didn't they act? Probably because they were scared of being labelled racist/Islamophobic or maybe they were scared their heads would be chopped off? Yup, that's how tough our governments are. We, the tax payer, pay these idiots to protect us and they are more concerned about what your kids eats at school, or where you park your car. The worst part is that these recruiter clowns detained in Gitmo, were compensated by Western governments for being “unfairly detained”. What a joke. Let's ask the Muslim countries about how they treat anyone who breaks the law in their country. I bet they don't get compensated with money...

Hat tip: Rextrut

At least 35 terrorists incarcerated at Guantánamo Bay were sent to fight against the West after being indoctrinated by extremist preachers in Britain, secret files obtained by The Daily Telegraph disclose.

Abu Qatada and Abu Hamza, two preachers who lived off state benefits after claiming asylum, are identified by the American authorities as the key recruiters responsible for sending dozens of extremists from throughout the world to Pakistan and Afghanistan via London mosques.
The leaked documents, written by senior US military commanders at Guantánamo Bay, illustrate how, for two decades, Britain effectively became a crucible of terrorism, with dozens of extremists, home-grown and from abroad, radicalised here.
Finsbury Park mosque, in north London, is described as a “haven” for extremists. United States intelligence officials concluded the mosque served as “an attack planning and propaganda production base”.
The files will raise questions over why the Government and security services failed to take action sooner to tackle the capital’s reputation as a staging post for terrorism, which became so established that the city was termed “Londonistan”.
The documents show that at least 35 detainees at Guantánamo had passed through Britain before being sent to fight against Allied forces in Afghanistan. This is thought to be more than from any other Western nation.
Of those, 18 were originally from abroad. The other 17 were British nationals or citizens granted residency here after claiming asylum, who were indoctrinated before being sent to terrorist training camps in Afghanistan.
The Government has paid millions of pounds in compensation and benefits to people regarded as highly dangerous by the US authorities.
Qatada, who was paid compensation under human rights laws for being “unfairly detained”, is described as “the most successful recruiter in Europe” and a “focal point for extremist fundraising [and] recruitment”. Hamza is accused of encouraging “his followers to murder non-Muslims”.
Four mosques in London and an Islamic centre are highlighted as places where young Muslim men were radicalised and turned into potential terrorists. Finsbury Park mosque “served to facilitate and training of recruits,” note the files, adding that it was “a haven for Islamic extremists from Morocco and Algeria.”

Read more here

25 April 2011

Ex KGB agent explains why Liberals are useful idiots

Former KGB agent Yuri Bezmenov would have known exactly what Barack Hussein Obama meant by "fundamentally transforming the United States of America". In this interview - filmed 25 YEARS AGO - he outlines all the stages of implementing Communism and explains why liberals are only useful idiots during the de-stabilisation phase - and are usually killed once Communism is fully implemented (I suppose the saying. the wheel turns - is apt here). Do yourself a favor and watch the video as there are interesting parallels to modern day USA shown throughout. We need to educate ourselves and look at the broader picture to understand why things happen as they do. We are all small players in a bigger circus and to watch it all we need to sit far away, observe and learn...

UK: Dad who split up fight in McDonald's shot dead

Another feel-good story about what innocent customers can expect when they visit McDonald's - this time in Brixton, South London. The race of the victim and the perpetrator has been scrubbed but it's believed that both are Black. Moral of the story: don't go to McDonald's as it seems only only low-life, bottom-feeders eat there and you may become a murder/assault victim for looking at one the wrong way.

McDonald's (pic: PA)

A DAD-of-four who split up a fight in a McDonald’s was shot dead moments after being told he wouldn’t see the morning.

Raymond Mitchell, 34, had only popped into the restaurant to buy a hot chocolate.

But he apparently caused offence after splitting up two men fighting in the queue.

One of them, who had several gold teeth, shouted at Raymond: “You are gonna die tonight, you are not gonna see the morning.”

The thug is then said to have phoned an accomplice to fetch a gun, yelling into his mobile: “Bring me that thing.”

Raymond left the 24-hour McDonald’s but was chased into a cul-de-sac. The gun was then delivered and Mr Mitchell was beaten and pistol-whipped before being shot three times in an alley in Brixton, South London, at 6.50am on Sunday. Raymond, nicknamed Brown, was taken to hospital but died hours later.

One neighbour, who saw the shooting but was too terrified to be named, said: “He was begging, literally begging for his life. I didn’t dare look out my window in case they saw me. I heard them laughing and swearing at him, calling him a ‘b***h’. I heard them laughing afterwards as well.”

Raymond’s partner, who asked not to be named, said: “I’m terrified. They’re still out there and they’ve not been caught. I’ve been told how they were laughing, actually laughing after they beat him and shot him. How could anybody do something like that?”

She had been out drinking with Raymond on Saturday night before he went into the West End to meet some friends for drinks.

She said: “Everybody loved him. He was well known around Brixton. Just a friendly guy.”

His family left tributes and flowers at the murder scene. One of his sons, Raquan Mitchell-Perry, 11, described as a “brilliant dad” in a poem. The Met’s Trident unit is investigating the murder.


The Globalists’ Takeover of Argentina is a Blueprint for America

Every now and then I come across a post that is thought provoking. Here is a very good article on how Argentina fell into socialism and compares it to what is currently happening in the USA. There are too many very good points to dismiss the parallels. If the USA doesn't wake up soon then they will be in deep trouble. Actually, I'd go so far as to say that they are in deep trouble with no way out. I sit outside the USA and I can see what their debt is doing to them, but their own 'intelligent' politicians can't?? I watch Fox News - and even I couldn't believe the naivety of the Democrats when the GOP tried to cut a few billion off the deficit. That cut eventually amounted to a few million and Obama was seen high-fiving for winning the issue over the Tea Party. Now you have the likes of Trump coming out to run for the Presidency. My first thought was that maybe he would be good for the USA as he has a successful business and he'll know what  to do about the economy - and he is also saying the right things. But, the more I hear about his past history of funding many devious Demonrat politicians and liberal causes then I can only surmise that he's a wolf in sheep's clothing and he ain't no Ronald Reagan! America needs a strong, upright conservative who has some cojones as they're going to need it with all the RINO's in the GOP. My vote is either on Allen West or Michelle Bachman for the job, but I somehow think that the GOP will ensure that they don't succeed. After all, the RINO's in the GOP don't want America to succeed.

Yes, George Soros was involved in the global elites’ takeover of Argentina which de-industrialized their country, eliminated their middle class and plunged their citizens into massive starvation and unspeakable poverty.

Yes, Argentina’s President and politicians were “in” with the global elites, and their Unions were “in” with the corrupt government officials… just as America’s President Obama, Congress and Unions are “in” with each other, with George Soros and with the other global elites.

That said, what happened in Argentina is what’s happening in America right now.

Argentina was a socialist country whereby the government controlled the means of production and doled out to the people via the “rights” their government granted. Because their government controlled everything, government had the ability to take everything away and sell off the revenue producing sources/resources to the global elites. And that’s just what they did… at bargain-basement prices.

They stripped Argentina of its assets, sold them off to the fat-cat global elites, and they increased Argentina’s national debt through massive out-of-control government spending that could never be repaid. This took money directly out of the pockets of the people in order to put it in their own pockets, to destroy their middle class and plunge the people into poverty – and of course to set the conditions to justify placing Argentina under International Monetary Fund (IMF)/United Nations‘ (UN) control.

In America, Obama has nationalized our banks, our car industry, student loans, healthcare, food, etc. These industries are now ripe and ready for sell-off to the fat-cat global elites.

Obama has added over $4.3 Trillion to our national debt in just 2 ½ years – with a complicit and corrupt Congress. To put that into perspective, it took 233 years to accumulate a national debt of $10 Trillion. In just 2 ½ years, Obama added 30% ($4.3 Trillion) to it through massive, massive spending that has to come directly out of the pockets of American citizens and businesses who already give approximately $2.1 Trillion to the Federal government every year.

Union leaders who brag about their daily interaction with the White House could care less that union employees will lose their jobs; they clearly state their primary objective is to suck as much money out of the government as possible, thus causing our national debt to go even higher in hopes of collapsing States under the weight of such massive government costs.

Now we’re hearing George Soros say that our government needs to spend more (increase our debt further), institute a ‘managed decline’ of our dollar (already in progress), and we hear that Treasury Secretary Timothy Geitner and the head of the largest private bank in America – the Federal Reserve’s Chairman Ben Bernanke are considering IMF/UN control of America’s economy and transition to a global currency which will abolish the dollar. How many pennies on the dollar do you think the exchange rate will be?

Obama is purposely causing energy prices to skyrocket (just as he promised during the 2008 Presidential campaign) because he will not let oil company’s drill; oil company’s and refineries are closing down operations in America and moving to globalist-favored countries like Brazil. Obama is also putting our coal industry out of business just as he said he would.

Can you see the parallels? Argentina was set up by their government in much the same way that George Soros, Obama and their comrades are setting America up.

A few more parallels on the destruction of Argentina…

Small businesses in Argentina where choked to death because they were being charged 50% interest on small business loans. Clearly the globalists were ensuring complete de-industrialization of Argentina. How easy is it for small businesses in America to get loans right now?

Argentina’s people never got justice and weren’t able to hold their corrupt politicians accountable because the politicians and courts/judges were all in on it and they had all the power. Sound familiar?

While Argentina’s people cried out for their “rights” and expected govt to give them what they were promised (jobs, food, etc.), the government, unions, globalists and public-private globalist corporations got wealthier and more powerful.

Obama, George Soros, Cass Sunstein, Hillary Clinton and their comrades in Congress are writing a new Constitution for America which gives government the power, not the people, to grant “rights” such as jobs, healthcare and food. Once they abolish our current Constitution (which purposely limits government control and places the power in the hands of the people) and institute their New Constitution giving government the power to give and take away our rights, the set-up is complete.

In election after election in Argentina, although the people voted, the candidates they chose from were all part of the global elites so it didn’t matter who won. As potential candidates here in America are being vetted, we see that Progressives pretending to be Republicans are plentiful… Donald Trump and Mike Huckabee included.

This is why potential candidates who know what’s going on, who want to restore our Constitution, and are against the globalists’ takeover of America… like Michelle Bachmann, Allen West and Sarah Palin… must be smeared and destroyed by our government-controlled media and globalist politicians on both sides of the aisle.

What’s happened in Argentina is important for us to know because we have a President whose actions are following the blueprint of destruction that befell Argentina.

America is now a heartbeat away from being sold out to the global elites just as Argentina’s government did to their citizens.

The following 12 part video series tells the tale (See link below for series - LL). Pay particular attention to the American players and global corporations we’re all familiar with. Also notice that the people of Argentina kept waiting for their government to give what they promised and many died as they waited. It wasn’t until they joined with their neighbors and began to occupy land and work together to feed and take care of themselves and each other that they were able to survive.


Australia: Asylum seekers luxury rewards

Here you have it fine people. This is how badly asylum seekers are being treated on Australian soil. If they play sport or learn to speak English they receive credits to buy cigarettes, nose-hair trimmers, chocolate and other treats! You can see in the picture below just how badly we treat these so-called refugees. They look unhealthy and emancipated - just how they'd look if they were fleeing dire circumstances. Then they have the audacity to burn down these types of centres in protest about how long it's taking to be processed - or if they've been denied refugee status. The Australian Labor government sure has their priorities right. Forget about the old-age pensioner who actually built this country up with their taxes and hard work. They get forgotten. Even the people in Queensland - the old folks - have been left to their own devices and ignored. But, not for our new economic migrants - who are looking to Australia to complete their free-loading way of life - nothing is forgotten. Food, clothes, housing, computers, phone calls, sports facilities, treats - you name it and they're given it for free (oh, sorry, treats need to be earned by playing sport and learning English). Yes, this is the wacky world of the liberal Utopian dream-catchers. If the Labor government isn't voted out next election then I will gladly admit that the Australian people are the 'dumbest in the world'.

asylum perks
Asylum seekers who play sport or take part in art classes are being rewarded with 'perk's points'

ASYLUM seekers who sign up for art classes and play sport while in detention in Western Australia are earning "reward points", which they can cash in for luxuries such as automated nose-hair trimmers, cigarettes and chocolate.

The luxuries are costing taxpayers tens of thousands of dollars a year.

Detainees in Australia, including those in WA, are entitled to claim battery-operated grooming gadgets, cigarettes, phone cards, snacks and confectionery by using reward points earned while playing soccer, volleyball and table tennis, and attending English and art lessons.

It comes as another two boats carrying suspected asylum seekers were intercepted by Australian authorities on Friday, one northwest of Christmas Island, believed to have 50 passengers, and another, which arrived on Cocos Island with 81 passengers.

The Department of Immigration and Citizenship this week confirmed that the Christmas Island centre had recently received a bulk delivery of taxpayer-funded nose-hair trimmers.

The department refused to say how much they cost, but sources told The Sunday Times the figure was about $7000.

Insiders at Curtin Immigration Detention Centre, 40km southeast of Derby, said a recent shipment of cigarettes intended for detainees was worth about $10,000. A spokesman for Immigration and Citizenship Minister Chris Bowen refused to say how much the Federal Government spent on detainees' cigarettes, but did not rule out that the Curtin shipment cost as much as $10,000.

A department spokeswoman said detention services contractor SERCO supplied a range of personal items for clients to buy using the points system, which applied in canteens in all Australian immigration detention facilities.

The spokeswoman could not say how many points were needed to buy the clippers.

Meanwhile, Deputy Opposition Leader Julie Bishop yesterday said she was "deeply concerned" by reports there would be continued outbreaks of violence and protests at Australia's detention centres, with authorities and police short of resources to deal with further unrest.