19 May 2010

Congressman Says Climate Science Should Be Simplified to ‘Sixth Grade Level’ Because Americans ‘Don’t Get’ It

Hey Americans! According to one of your Congressmen (a Democrat I might add), you're too stupid to understand the complex argument of global warming and we now have to speak slowly to you and dumb down our language so you will "get it". Capiche? That's the Progressive way - you're just a big dumb-dumb; they know better about what's good for you. Don't you get it Stupid??



Americans are growing skeptical about the threat of global warming because “they don’t get” the complex information that scientists deliver, according to Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D-Mo.).

Unless scientists can simplify their arguments to the level of newspapers that “print at the sixth grade level,” Cleaver said, the public is “going to get a headache and bail out.”

Cleaver made his comments to a panel of scientists on Capitol Hill at a hearing last Thursday of the House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming.

The committee was investigating the “foundation” of climate science after the Climategate scandal saw thousands of damaging e-mails leaked from scientists at the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit.

The Missouri Democrat was responding to scientist James McCarthy, who said that science can sometimes be twisted by stakeholders because the conclusions can seem contradictory.

Cleaver responded by suggesting scientists needed to dumb-down their information – and emulate newspapers.

“I think the newspapers are supposed to be printed at the sixth grade level and I think with something as important as (global warming), we’ve got to figure out how to simplify the language for the public, because otherwise they’re going to get a headache and bail out because they -- not because they’re not concerned, but because they don’t get it.”

Nearly half of Americans now believe the threat of climate change is not a great as policymakers have characterized it.

“I think all of the denials and all of the talk of Climategate has had an impact, at least in the United States,” he said.

“In 1997, Gallup began conducting polls on attitudes in the United States on climate change and, tragically, the number of people who believed that climate change had been exaggerated, according to Gallup, the latest poll is 48 percent, and until the latest poll, the number of those who embraced climate change as being impacted by human activity was on the way up.

“So, the folk who have been fighting this have, unfortunately from my vantage point, been winning.”

The findings Cleaver cited come from the Gallup Social Series Environment poll and were reported on March 11.

At that time, Gallup said its annual update on American attitudes toward the environment showed “a public that over the last two years has become less worried about the threat of global warming, less convinced that its effects are already happening, and more likely to believe that scientists themselves are uncertain about its occurrence.”

The pollster said: “In response to one key question, 48 percent of Americans now believe that the seriousness of global warming is generally exaggerated, up from 41 percent in 2009 and 31 percent in 1997, when Gallup first asked the question.”

Source

1 comment:

  1. Anonymous21/5/10 11:32

    GOD'S ANSWER TO MEN
    WORRIED ABOUT GLOBAL
    WARMING:

    "While the earth remaineth, seed-
    time AND harvest, AND cold and
    heat, AND summer and winter.
    AND day and night shall not
    cease!!!" Genesis 8:22

    A PERSONAL "WARMING"
    FOR MAN WITHOUT GOD.

    After man has been
    given the LIMIT of God's Mercy;
    After the christians are raptured
    out of here, the Vials of God's
    WRATH will be poured out on MEN.

    "And the fourth angel poured out
    his vial upon the sun, and power
    was given unto him to scorch men
    with fire."

    "And men were scorched with great
    heat, and blasphemed the name of
    God, which hath power over these
    plagues: and they repented NOT
    to give Him glory !!! " (Rev. 16:8 & 9)

    jdf, 05/20/10

    ReplyDelete