06 October 2015

Sweden: Lesbian "Bishop" wants to remove church cross for Islam

This post is just to show you how farked up Sweden is becoming under the Progressive filth running the country. Actually, apply that to any country Progressives occupy. They are mentally ill.

A  Church of Sweden lesbian Bishop, Eva Brunne, is proposing removing all signs of the cross from a church in her diocese, and rather marking the direction of Mecca for the benefit of any Muslim worshipers who may happen to stumble onto the church. 

Because, one wouldn't want to offend Muslims or stop them from visiting a church, because, god forbid, there are Christian symbols in a Christian church....

I wonder if lesbian Bishop Brunne is aware of what Muslims do to homosexuals?

That's what's wrong with the world. A lesbian - made a Bishop of a Christian church. A woman who can't preach about the traditional family, espouse the values, and/or promote true Christianity. Bishop Eva was the first token first openly lesbian priest to be made a Bishop of the Church of Sweden and is 'married' to a fellow lesbian priest Gunilla Linden and the happy wives are raising a young son. There is so much wrong with this entire scenario - where does one even begin?

God help the child, is all I know.

Actually, I'm pretty surprised Sweden has any churches or Christians left. I guess this woman is an example of what the new social justice "Christian" churches, springing up all around the world, promotes. Anything that was once shunned is now considered 'normal' and is to be embraced, encouraged and defended at the expense of the traditional family and Christian values. Just imagine sitting through one of her sermons. You'd leave feeling dirty.

These days the church is no longer a meeting place of worship, but rather a political platform used by the Left to brainwash people and make them feel guilty, because they're not tolerant enough, or not doing enough to help their fellow 3rd world'ers. Go to 'church' and get preached to on how you need to accept non-Christian values, sacrifice your society to be inclusive and diverse, and give your hard-earned money to others who are too lazy to help themselves. 

After all, the West was built into a success by diverse people sitting around all day moaning about what they don't have and envying and coveting what others have achieved.

In the past, missionaries used to go out into the world to preach about goodness, and try and better the lives of the non-believers. Most were murdered, so that had to stop. Nowadays, church leaders would rather just bash their followers over the head in church. It's much easier than actually doing, and makes them feel good at the same time.

In this case, the church targeted by this lesbian woman is the Seamen’s mission church in Stockholm’s eastern dockyards. The church is visited by travelling seamen. 

What is her reasoning behind removing the cross, you ask? From her blog:
"It is important that there are places for praying sisters and brothers and we show hospitality and tolerance, regardless of faith."
I'm going out on a limb here, but I'm pretty sure no mosque would remove traces of Islam for the odd Christian who happened to go inside? Just a wild guess. 

What's next? Muslim prayer-rooms and Buddhist altars in consecrated Christian churches? Err.... yes, most definitely. It's only a matter of time. The West is being Progressed down the toilet after all.

Then she keeps going:
"Priests are called to proclaim Christ. We do that every day and in every meeting with people. But that does not mean that we are stingy toward people of other faiths."
This is what 'tolerance' brings the world. A messed up society trying to please everyone, so as not to offend anyone, or be regarded as stingy. Being all things to everyone never works out very well for the appeaser. 

Sometimes, dear lesbian Bishop, you have to draw a line in the sand and stick up for your principles and protect the heritage you were fortunate enough to inherit from previous generations. But when you don't have principles, then this is the end result. Appeasement.

Her final words of wisdom:
Remember to entertain strangers, for it has happened that those who have done it have had angels without knowing it.  (Hebrews 13: 2)
Thanks, but I would prefer not to entertain strangers. Same as I would prefer not to pick up hitch-hikers. It often doesn't end well.

But, seeing as the good Bishop is big on quoting the Bible, maybe she needs to read this passage:
Exodus 23:24 Thou shalt not bow down to their gods, nor serve them, nor do after their works: but thou shalt utterly overthrow them, and quite break down their images.
Maybe the Bible was translated incorrectly into Swedish? That would sure explain a lot of what's gone wrong with Sweden.

Once you start trashing church traditions, pretty soon you have to make it up as you go along, until suddenly there’s nothing left of what you inherited or stood for. 

Next thing Bishop Lesbian Brunne knows is that there's a mosque where once a Church of Sweden stood. That should make her real happy.

The appeaser Bishop Eva Brunne

The Bishop of Stockholm has proposed a church in her diocese remove all signs of the cross and put down markings showing the direction to Mecca for the benefit of Muslim worshippers.

Eva Brunne, who was made the world’s first openly lesbian bishop by the church of Sweden in 2009, and has a young son with her wife and fellow lesbian priest Gunilla Linden, made the suggestion to make those of other faiths more welcome.

The church targeted is the Seamen’s mission church in Stockholm’s eastern dockyards. The Bishop held a meeting there this year and challenged the priest to explain what he’d do if a ship’s crew came into port who weren’t Christian but wanted to pray.

Calling Muslim guests to the church “angels“, the Bishop later took to her official blog to explain that removing Christian symbols from the church and preparing the building for Muslim prayer doesn’t make a priest any less a defender of the faith. Rather, to do any less would make one “stingy towards people of other faiths”.

The bishop insisted this wasn’t an issue, after all airports and hospitals already had multi-faith prayer rooms, and converting the dockyard church would only bring it up to speed. Regardless, the announcement has aroused protest.

Father Patrik Pettersson, one of the priests in her diocese and active in the same parish as the Seaman’s mission church has hit back in a blog of his own, complaining there is no way you could equate a consecrated church with a prayer room, remarking “I should have thought a bishop would be able to tell the difference”.

02 October 2015

This is my understanding of the Syrian situation

This is my assessment of the Syrian situation:

Obama's administration and the neo-cons in Congress want President Bashar al-Assad of Syria gone. Dead or alive, he needs to go. The exact reason is unknown, but what is known is that Saudi Arabia and Qatar - both allies of the USA - are enemies of Assad. 

Assad is a Shia Muslim, the Saudi's and Qataris are Sunni Muslim. This is the reason for the centuries-old conflict in the region, and importing this conflict into our Western countries via Muslim "refugees" will not end well for us.

The Saudi's go one step further in that the Sunni's are Salafi and/or Wahhabi Sunni's - ultra conservative orthodox Muslims, who tend to interpret the Koran extremely literally. Hence why people have their heads chopped off in the street if you insult Mo. This is also the reason they use their oil money to litter the world with Wahhabi mosques and Islamic-only schools, i.e. madrasa, in Western countries - to force Islam onto kaffir non-believers. It's why Saudi Arabia very generously offered to build one new mosque in Germany for every 100 Muslims Germany takes in as 'refugees', without offering to take in any refugees themselves. Just like all the other rich gulf states, Qatar included, who have also not offered to take in any Muslim "refugees". 

The stupid West gets that honour. Nothing like enriching a country with imported tribal conflicts. Hi Germany!

Apart from the obvious tribal conflicts between the different Islamic sects in the Middle East, there are also underlying geo-political power-plays driving the conflict in the region. 

Syria stands in the way of any direct gas/oil pipeline into Europe, which Qatar wants to build. If they have their proxy ISIS running Syria, problem solved.

So, on the one side you have the Shia-run countries (supported by Russia):
  • Syria
  • Iran
  • Lebanon (Hezbollah)
  • Iraq
On the other you have the Sunni-run countries (supported by the USA/Britain):
  • Saudi Arabia
  • Qatar
  • Turkey
Iraq is a mix of the two sects, but Shia is the slight majority (~ 51% Shia and ~42% Sunni). The government is mainly Shia. Hence why Iran is their current buddy.

So, back to Syria. 

The USA, for unknown reasons, decided to stick its nose in the region shortly after Barry from Honolulu was elected POTUS. This was all done by encouraging the Arab Spring. This off the back of Barry removing US troops from Iraq without leaving a presence behind to maintain the fragile and hard-won peace. 

How many (White) American troops died fighting that war, all for it to mean nothing in the end??? Same with Afghanistan.

The Arab Spring was no 'spontaneous grass-roots movement' as certain people and the media would have you believe. It was a carefully orchestrated attack on certain strategic Islamic regimes in the ME. 

As part of the Arab Spring, America threw their former friendly-dictators under the bus, one by one. Out with the old, in with the new.

The catalyst for the Arab Spring was in Tunisia, where a man set himself alight to protest the poor economic state in the country. That was the spark used to justify the Arab Spring spreading to other countries.

First Mubarak was thrown under the bus and Egypt fell to the Muslim Brotherhood; however, order was quickly restored - luckily - with the military taking over and ousting the MB. The Brotherhood - backed by Obama - is Sunni. Obama's half-brother is a member of the Muslim Brotherhood...

Libya was then targeted and Ghadaffi removed with the blessing of Hilary Clinton. Just under a year later, US Ambassador Stevens was murdered in Benghazi along with 3 other Americans. Reason for his murder is unknown, but it is widely believed it was because America was funneling Ghadaffi's stockpile of weapons to the Syrian 'rebels' via Libya - overseen by Stevens, and planned by Hilary/Bill Clinton and the Obama administration. Bill Clinton is in bed with the Qataris through his "foundation". He has received millions in donations from them and used his wife to further Qatar's agenda. I would guess it's why Madam Clinton used a private email account while Secretary of State.

Today Libya burns with tribal wars and ISIS infiltrating. The country now acts as the gateway for Africans and other economic migrants to climb on board boats headed for gullible Europe. Ghadaffi warned this exact thing would happen should he be removed. 

In the meantime, the Arab Spring was 'spontaneously' moving from one ME country to another. It spluttered in Yemen, but gained traction in Syria. Syria was the ultimate prize of course. 

The US military armed and trained "good rebels" in Syria to depose Assad. And just as the world was looking incredulously at America for wanting to start another ME conflict, the US government miraculously found evidence that Assad had used chemical weapons against his own people - thereby justifying them bombing Syria. Barry had just by pure accident a few weeks earlier, drawn a red-line outlining at what point he'd bomb Syria to help the rebels and save Syria, and that red-line was if Assad used chemicals weapons. 

And bingo, don't you just know it - Assad was found to have done just that by Obama's 'rebels'. Gee, what are the chances, right? And there are still idiots in the world who think Assad wasn't set up. 

Luckily Russia stepped in before America started bombing and defused the situation by convincing Assad to hand over any chemical weapons he may have. That was a pretty genius move by Russia, as it nullified the US from using that paltry excuse to bomb Syria down the line; and, it made the world see that Assad was willing to do the right thing.

Russia started looking like a world-leader (hence why they had to attack Putin via Ukraine and sanctions).

Back in Iraq, the ousted army generals and soldiers who served under Suddam Hussein, had united to form ISIS in east Syria, on the border with Iraq. Once America removed the troops from Iraq, that was the signal for ISIS to move into Iraq and start their campaign of creating the Islamic caliphate via their war of terror and death. That was the excuse given, but the real reason was to depose the Shia government in Baghdad and return government to the Sunni's. Saudi Arabia and Qatar would be happy again.

Most of the Syrian "rebels" who had been armed and trained by the US to depose Assad, joined ISIS instead, eagerly handing over their band-new American-gifted weapons and other supplies to ISIS, and the rest is pretty much history.

In Syria today you have the US-backed 'rebel' fighters fighting side-by-side with ISIS to get rid of Assad. They are practically one and the same thing.

And that is the reason Russia bombed the hell out of the 'rebels' 2 days ago when they launched their air offensive in Syria. 

Both the rebels and ISIS are enemies of Assad. Assad is Russia's ally.

I find it pretty funny how the American analysts now attack Russia for targeting the US-backed 'rebel' fighters. HELLO! Earth to reality.

Saudi Arabia was also quick to condemn the Russian bombings. Apparently innocent women and children were killed. This all said with a straight face. First, dear Saudi Arabia, you execute women and children in your country every year - usually on the flimsiest excuse - without batting an eyelid. Secondly, have you forgotten that Saudi Arabia has been bombing Yemen for months now, killing thousands of innocent women and children in the process???

The hypocrisy is astounding.

Russia has stepped in because they have 2 military bases in Syria to support their Black Sea naval fleet - plus, Assad is their ally. Unlike America, Russia is loyal to their allies. Having Assad in control of Syria also secures them against Qatar threatening their gas lines into Europe.

Iran needs Assad to remain where he is, otherwise Hezbollah in Lebanon will be cut off from Iran and Turkey will have more clout in the region. Iran also needs to secure Iraq against Saudi Arabia getting their grubby paws on the country via ISIS.

The only issue I don't quite understand in this entire drama, is why America, under John Kerry, decided to work with Iran regarding the nuclear issue. That part is still a bit hazy to me.The only reason would be to threaten Israel via Iran - but then why go to the trouble of destabilising Syria and Iraq to return them to Sunni control if you then work with Iran and strengthen a Shia nation? Maybe one of my readers can help me out with that one.

And there you have my brief analysis. Let me know if you disagree.

30 September 2015

Guess where in the world.....

Let's play a game of 'guess where in the world'.

Was this video shot in:
  • Africa
  • The Middle East
  • Austria/Hungary


The Invasion of Europe - Pat Condell

Pat Condell has released his latest video titled "The invasion of Europe".

Condell is an Irish/English writer, comedian and YouTube personality.

In the video below he laments how the EU can't be trusted with the security of Europe due to the Muslim invasion. 

Condell is a militant aetheist, and as with all aetheists, he has done his part in trashing the Judeo-Christian heritage of the West. For decades he has lambasted Christianity constantly. I'm guessing Condell is Gay from the way he speaks so no guesses as to why he's an aetheist.

But, now Pat moans about the Islamic invasion.

Pat, dear, there are consequences to actions. Maybe think about that next time.

What I find ironic is that these aetheists sit in nice safe countries, created based on Judeo-Christian principles, then turn around and trash what that heritage has brought them - stable, enlightened, safe and civilised societies (tolerant of homosexuals). Our laws and social norms, after all, have been shaped by the 10 Commandments found in the Bible. 

Well Pat and all you other militant aetheists, you have helped pave the way for the Muslim invasion to happen, when you helped bring down Christianity. Once Christian principles were weakened and removed, it led to the erosion of civil society. The fabric of core beliefs that once held everyone together has slowly been torn apart.

And all you good Progressives clambered for multi-culturalism - now you've got it in spades - so you should be out celebrating what you helped create and not making videos moaning.

So, you ask, just how can I blame aetheists for the destruction of the West? 

Well, what belief system do Progressive aetheists ascribe to?? The answer: Any trendy new shiny thing that comes along that takes their fancy. Their new cause suddenly becomes acceptable and is pushed on everyone else. And they keep going. There's a constant new want or need they have to satisfy. And everyday they move further and further away from common decency, respect, civility and Christian principles, towards debauchery, disrespect and loutish behaviour.

Because when you have no higher power to answer to, you become your own god and conscience. In the world of the aetheist there is no sin, because there is no higher being judging you. Whatever you feel like doing, just do it. 

Sex, drugs and rock-n-roll, baby!

As the saying goes: He who stands for nothing, falls for anything (and everything). 

As Christianity has fallen, so has Progressivism risen, and with it the dark world of what Progressives stand for. The world has flipped upside down under the Progressives. And not for the better.

With atheism has come moral relativity which has paved the way for such frauds as multi-culturalism, because, well, all cultures are really equal and who are we to tell people they can’t kill their wives and mutilate their daughters? After all, we have no belief system at all or we all have different ones so what the heck, everything goes. Right?

We no longer have a shared conscientiousness of what it means to be a Western society. There is no consistent set of values anymore that will allow people to fight back against an enemy. Who is the enemy anyway?? These days we are not allowed to know, or think thoughts - because putting labels on people you neither trust or like is showing you to be a racist bigot xenophobe.

The other laughable argument from aetheists against religion is that they don't go around slaughtering each other over "an imaginary friend in the sky". 

Yeah, except that authoritarian regimes such as the Marxists, Communists, Nazis and your garden variety fascists (including the Islamic cult), all of which are the natural enemy of God, dispatched more people off this mortal coil last century than anything else - combined. They didn’t do so over arguments about flying spaghetti monsters, but this didn’t stop the wholesale brutality and murder of hundreds of millions of people.

It's easy to kill when you don't have to answer to God.

So, chin up old boy. No more sad-sack videos about how you hate Islam. Embrace your new fascists in England. You helped build this - so own it. Proudly.

And I'm guessing that right about now, Pat is thinking Christianity isn't so bad after all.......


A debate was held on 17 SEP 2015 between Danish and Swedish politicians,  media and commentators about refugees in their countries.

I was quite proud of myself - I managed to listen to the entire thing without putting my fist through the computer.

The level of stupidity from EVERY Swedish participant (apart from the last lady Paula Bieler from the Swedish Democrats) amazed me. Now you can see why Sweden is a lost cause. The level of brainwashing and politically-correct group-think from the Swedish Left is pretty scary. And they speak with such conviction. 

How does that saying go? The most dangerous liars are those who think they are telling the truth. 

The female Mayor of Sodertalje in Sweden, Boel Godner was a classic fascist. She couldn't admit on TV that her municipality couldn't take anymore 'refugees'. She has previously said they are not coping with the numbers, but in this debate she outright refused to even entertain the idea. Then she went on to attack Ms Bieler, saying that just because the anti-immigration party, the Swedish Democrats, had nearly 30% support in Sweden, didn't mean they should be heard. She likened them to a party of Nazi's. 

I guess the tolerant Left is only tolerant when you agree with their views. Otherwise, you need to shut up, keep your views to yourself - or better, don't think them - and you are regarded as the unseen, unheard great unwashed. Thank goodness for the morally superior Ms Godner. She must think she's god, or something.

But, the real piece of work was Swedish 'journalist' Henrick Arnstad. See if you can count the number of times he used the words: racist, Nazi, or referred to the second world war. You'll give up after the first few minutes. No matter the point made, he kept going back to racism and WWII. My IQ fell listening to him.

If this is the level of public officials, then kiss Sweden goodbye. 

There is some hope for Denmark, though. A slight glimmer. At least in Denmark you may openly state your views, which is not allowed in Sweden.

29 September 2015


The Gauteng education MEC Panyaza Lesufi is fresh out of ideas.

That's what he gets paid lots of money for - to be out of ideas.

Which ideas is he out of? Well, he's given up on how to stop the high levels of teenage pregnancy in schools in his province. That would be Black teenage girls.

Here is verbatim what he had to say about what he thinks the reason is for the problem:
“It’s a process. You drink alcohol, your knees get weak, then you need ‘tjovitjo’ (sex) and that leads to pregnancy.”
No Mr Lesufi. The reason girls are getting pregnant is because monkeys like you are running government departments, when all you are good enough to do is to smash big rocks into little rocks and keep repeating the process until you are one day no more.

Seriously. How can these imbeciles be running anything? Drink alcohol. Knees get weak. Have sex and then pregnant? He sounds like he's been having some good dreams. I wonder how many babies he's fathered with school girls?

How about doing something about the first point. How about discouraging teenagers from drinking? You think??

How about getting their parents involved? How about bringing in some tough laws, such as if you get pregnant, you have to leave school and you don't qualify for any baby grants - your family has to support you and the baby forever? That would be a start. Maybe it would force parents to care where their daughters are and what they're getting up to.

Then how about charging whoever is having sex with the underage girls - usually grown men? The fathers need to pay for the upkeep of their babies, and if they're at school, they should also be forced to leave together with their baby-mamma.

If there is no consequence, there is no reason to stop unacceptable behaviour.

Those are just a few random ideas, Mr Lesufi. And I don't even get paid your big fat salary.

And how about bringing discipline back into schools? Back in the bad days of Apartheid, you hardly had any girls getting pregnant at school. Know why? Because it was seen as a HUGE embarrassment to the family. The girls had to leave school and were not welcomed back. They just left in the middle of the night. Back then, school girls getting pregnant were regarded as sluts. There was also no abortion available, so you and your family had to live with the consequence for the rest of your lives. The embarrassment, the scandal, the gossip, the shunning - that was enough to make girls think twice.

But not today. No, the old days were just too strict. Maybe - but then which attitude is better? A strict no tolerance approach, or the modern 'anything goes' attitude of today?

Well, one policy produced hardly any teenage pregnancies. The other has left the department of education out of ideas.

The new South Africa normal

PRETORIA - Gauteng education MEC Panyaza Lesufi says his department has run out of ideas of how to stop the high levels of teenage pregnancy in schools across the province.

The MEC has called on those attending the Gauteng Education Summit this weekend to help him address the problem.

Drugs and alcohol abuse in schools are also at the top of the agenda of the summit and Lesufi has called on the Gauteng Department of Social Development for its assistance.

Lesufi says the out of control levels of teenage pregnancy in schools are the result of a value chain: alcohol, drugs, and unprotected sex.

“It’s a process. You drink alcohol, your knees get weak, then you need ‘tjovitjo’ (sex) and that leads to pregnancy.”

He says that means HIV and Aids are entering the schooling space and his department is at a loss of how to deal with it.

But the MEC made it clear that sex education is needed.

“Before you give them condoms, educate them first, and then distribute condoms later.”

Lesufi has also called on the provincial government to shut down taverns selling alcohol and drugs to underage girls.

Germany introduces Apartheid

Yes, you read correctly. Apartheid goes to Germany.

Apartheid basically means separateness. Germany is now separating the Christian and Muslim migrants, hence Apartheid:
In the German state of Thuringia, Prime Minister Bodo Ramelow, one of the multiculturalists driving and celebrating the migrant crisis, has been forced to initiate a policy of separating and segregating different cultures as soon as they arrive in Europe.
So there you have it. A liberal state PM, who is a multi-culturalism worshiper and an avid migrant celebrant, is being forced to implement Apartheid to keep the different cultures and religions apart. 

To keep the Muslims from attacking the Christians.

I bet some of you are thinking that calling that Apartheid is a far reach. Yeah, maybe, but I'm just doing what the Liberal media did for years to South Africa: over-exaggerating. For years White South Africans were the pariah of the world for wanting to live separate from the violent Black tribes. So, why should other countries be treated differently when they impose similar policies?

Apartheid it is then.

And it keeps getting better. Sixty people were hurt when a mass riot broke out over food at a tented refugee camp in Calden near Kassel, Germany. Police used tear gas to break up brawling between ~400 refugees:
The riot at Calden near Kassel came on the the same day Germany's biggest police union called for a new 'apartheid' system to be enforced in refugee homes – the separation of people according to religion – after a number of flare ups in recent weeks.
See, even the German police call it Apartheid. 
Conservative politicians back the calls for separated refugee centres, claiming Christians in the homes are being harassed and persecuted by hardline Muslims. 
How mad must you be to willingly import these barbarians into your country? It's not as if the German government wouldn't have been aware of what the most likely outcome would be when you bring in 800 000+ mainly young male Muslims in a year. Hint: Just look at what their home countries look like.

You can read about the riot HERE. You will note from the article that anyone who is against the migrant invasion and dares to protest is labeled as a far-right extremist...... how utterly predicable and misleading from the media. Sigh.

As expected, Angela Merkel's popularity is on the decline, as Germans wake up from their 'initial elation' of welcoming the economic migrants:
Officials are working to “ward off panic” regarding the 1 million migrants expected to enter the country this year, as the realities of the crisis begin to set in on German residents.
“There have … been signs that the initial elation is fading,” reported German weekly Der Spiegel in a lead article this week, according to NBC News. “Germany is struggling to maintain its composure and to ward off panic.”
Yes Germany, now is the right time to panic.

And, initial elation?? Anyone suffering from elation should be given a few 'refugees' to look after, at their own cost. That would soon cure them of elation or a sense of welcome.

A conservative estimate is that an additional 800 000 migrants this year will cost Germany about 10 billion euros. Germany also plans to set aside 5 billion euros  in windfall income this year to help cover the cost of looking after asylum seekers in 2016. 

Are they kidding? It cost Australia $10 billion to process and support 50,000 illegal boat arrivals under Labor, so please go pull the other leg if they think it's only going to cost 10 billion euros for 800 000 of the buggers. You can easily times that 10 by 8 and you start getting a rough idea of the true cost of Merkels compassion.

That doesn't factor in the additional costs when the 800 000 start bringing in their extended families, or the crime cost to the country....... Germany will soon overtake Sweden as the rape capital of Europe.

Imagine bringing in nearly 1 million low-intelligent, low-skilled people in a year and trying to sort them out with jobs, housing, education and medical care? How many jobs has Germany got ready for these migrants?? People who can't understand the language, or the culture, or have the skills to work as anything more than a labourer? 

Who the heck is paying for all this compassion? The German citizens.  I'm not sure if Merkel asked her citizens if they were happy for her to spend nearly 100 bn euros of their taxes to support 1 million invaders. 

As a result of this compassion, some Germans are getting kicked out of their rental properties as landlords get paid more to take in refugees. Pensioners are still waiting on a pension raise, but oops, there's no more money as migrants now come first ahead of German citizens, who have paid taxes their entire lives.

This is what redistribution of wealth and national suicide looks like. 

Yup, makes perfect sense. If you're a commie liberal progressive narcissist.

New German citizens


While Obama fawns over Pope, Russia and China arrive in Syria

Last Friday the Chinese aircraft carrier Liaoning-CV-16 docked at the Syrian port of Tartus, accompanied by a guided missile cruiser:
...... sources find evidence that the Chinese forces are digging in for a prolonged stay in Syria. The carrier put into Tartus minus its aircraft contingent. The warplanes and helicopters should be in place on its decks by mid-November - flying in directly from China via Iran or transported by giant Russian transports from China through Iranian and Iraqi airspace.
The USA now looks pretty foolish, seeing as both Russia and China are now in Syria, there to support and protect their ally Assad. They are also working with Iran. A move the USA didn't seem to see coming, or chose to ignore until too late.

Once the Chinese aircraft carrier arrived, leading-from-behind John Kerry quickly tried to engage Iran to bypass the Russia/Chinese initiative, but alas, poor Ketchup Kerry was too late, as Iran has been moving forward fast to augment its military presence in the war-torn country, buttressed by the ground, air and sea support of two world powers, Russia and China.

I guess Kerry thought he had built up street-cred with Iran, seeing as he'd bowed down to Iran only a month earlier and opened up the possibility of them acquiring nuclear weapons. Thanks John!

Just a tip dear Mr Kerry - when you operate from a position of weakness, then your enemies are laughing at you and not waiting on you with bated breath.  You are now regarded as a gullible fool in Iran, you twit. 

If you snooze you lose, and it looks like the US government and Obama was more interested in fawning over the Marxist Pope and worrying about 'global warming' than keeping their eyes on Syria, China, Russia and Iran. 

Russia has two bases in Syria - the logistics base in Tartus and the military airfield in Latakia. They are now constructing a military base in Latakia, which is roughly 5km away from the Bassel al Assad airport that also serves as a military airfield.

So, why are Russia and China so interested in defeating ISIS? Apart from ISIS threatening Assad, they also have personal interest in some of the ISIS fighters:
DEBKAfile’s counterterrorism sources point out that just as Russian marines will be instructed to single out rebel militias with recruits from Chechnya and the Caucasus, the Chinese marines will seek out and destroy Uighur fighters from the northern predominantly Muslim Chinese province of Xinjiang.
In the same way that Putin has no wish to see the Chechen fighters back in Russia, so too Chinese President Xi wants to prevent the Uighurs from returning home from the Syrian battlefields.
So, there you have it. Some leaders with testosterone and national interest at heart.

The US military under Obama has been decimated of its top leaders, and has instead morphed into a social experiment, where Christianity is discouraged, feminism is encouraged, and social justice and inclusivity of every sexual deviant is celebrated. 

This is the natural psyche of the Progressive pacifist, which explains Obama. 

Obama also doesn't have the heart to destroy what he lovingly helped create - ISIS. He has limply gone through the motion of bombing them on the odd occasion, with hardly any impact made over the last few years. His military response against ISIS mirrors his effeminate character - he is an empty suit on an empty chair - and so is his bombing campaign in Iraq and Syria.

Let's see how Russia, China and Iran go against ISIS. We can only hope that they manage to wipe the scum off the world map. 

And Obama should be worried, because defeating ISIS would not only be a coup for this new tri-military partnership, but it will also show Obama up for the do-nothing, incompetent, floozy of a community organiser that he is. 

What is very clear now, is that Assad will remain in Syria. Russia, Iran and China have spoken and the USA has no choice but to listen - unless they want to start World War 3.